Free Republic

Felt it pretty good all the way down in Murrieta!

Oh right, and Biden the Sniffer (an accused sexual assaulter) is spiritually perfect.

Those New Yorkers, so well-mannered and polite!

I've been in meetings with high-level NYPD staff and was astounded by the swear words that are tossed about during business meetings with outsiders, even by the women.

God bless Vin Scully.

Is this what you're looking for? Out of Shadows

Saw the video before it went private.

It immediately brought to mind Revelation 13:15.
And it was given to him to give breath to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast would even speak and cause as many as do not worship the image of the beast to be killed.

Vox completely misinterprets Gorsuch's opinion.

First they describe what he said:

In that opinion, Gorsuch suggested that current law risks giving agencies “unbounded policy choices.” His explanation of what new limits he would impose on federal agencies is vague and it’s hard to find a clear legal rule in the opinion. Nevertheless, Gorsuch writes that a federal law permitting agencies to regulate must be “‘sufficiently definite and precise to enable Congress, the courts, and the public to ascertain’ whether Congress’s guidance has been followed.”

Then Vox purposely mischaracterizes the effect in order to rile up their readers:

Gorsuch, in other words, would give the Republican-controlled Supreme Court a veto power over all federal regulations. That prospect should chill each of the Democratic presidential candidates to the bone. If any of them prevail, their administration would have to seek a permission slip from the Court if it wants to regulate, if Gorsuch’s view holds sway.

WRONG! Gorsuch would require Congress to write laws that are more specific as to how they are to be implemented, especially where major policies with huge cost impacts are concerned. If that was done properly, there would be no "permission slip seeking" necessary. It would be Congress' fault if the laws are written poorly, and the law would be, I surmise, struck down for being too vague. Congress could then revisit the issue to fix it if they are so inclined. But the idea that all regulation would henceforth be subject to approval by the Supreme Court is ludicrous and wrong.

This is why a rich person should never leave behind money for an endowment. It will eventually be subverted from its intended purpose.

Instead spend your money, leave it to relatives, donate it to worthy charities, heck, give it away to random strangers, but for God's sake DON'T PUT IT IN A FOUNDATION!

neither one has anything to do with your life

An omniscient, omnipresent God that created the universe (the "christian theory" you mentioned), yet loves humanity and sent his son to tell the world about him and suffer a brutal death so that we could live with Him in eternity doesn't have "anything to do with your life"?

Kamala Harris is why.

No offense, but do you have any idea how ridiculous this sounds? Syria is a sovereign nation, and the U.S. had no more right to "retain main influence" anywhere in its borders than China has to "retain main influence" anywhere in the U.S.

+1

I noticed that too. What a clown show.

Remember how Nobel prize winner Krugman told us the stock market was going to crash and burn for a long time if Trump was elected?

Yeah, this prognostication has about as much a chance of success as that one did. In other words, zero.

“After all, Trump’s reelection arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy, to the Fed’s independence and its ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives,” he wrote.

Let's see, currently:
- Unemployment rate is very low
- Inflation is very low

So how exactly is Trump's reelection a threat to the economy?

Did you miss this paragraph from the article?

The most infamous wood-burning power station in the world is DRAX in Britain. It burns more wood than the U.K. produces and more than any other station in the world. It gets huge subsidies for felling forests as far away as America, then chipping and drying the wood and transporting pellets across the Atlantic. Every step on the way causes large emissions of CO2, but these are conveniently ignored in the mindless war on coal.

Nunes questioned why such a report would come out when only one person has described Mifsud as an asset of Russia, and it was not even Mueller.

Because the Washington Post is an asset of the CIA. Everyone knows this.

You’ll probably want to fix the link attached to the article to match the one I provided.

Here is the correct link to the video.

Did you intentionally provide the wrong link?

The Guardian's fear-mongering has about as much cred as this prediction by Nobel Prize recipient Paul Krugman of what would happen if Trump became President:

So we are very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight.

Bahahahahahaha!