Free Republic

"During an immigration subcommittee hearing in March, Mr. Cannon had the gumption to question the executive director of CIS, Mark Krikorian, as well as to challenge Roy Beck, who heads NumbersUSA and serves as 'spokesman' for CFAW."

Mr. Cannon? HIM? Oh yeah, good old Cannonball Addlehead, the guy who is long-since bought and paid for by Wall Street, MECHA, La Raza, and the Vicente Fox administration (probably with a few tips thrown in by the neocons...).

"After first denying it, Mr. Krikorian was forced to admit that CIS is a spin-off of FAIR."

A spin-off of FAIR? Ohhhhh -- you mean the same way some supporters of forced race-replacement like The Southern Carpetbagger Poverty-Pimp Lawless Way-Left-of-Center get-rich-quick scheme of Morris Dees are spin-offs of "The Communist Manifesto" and "Das Kapital," and other advocates of forced race-replacement, like The Off-the-Wall Street-Walker Urinal and the entire Bush administration are spin-offs of the worst sort of mafioso-type Bush-family Tex-Mex mutually-bribing, scratch-my-back-I'll scratch-yours Crony-Capitalism? Ohhhhh, now I get it -- in that case, yeah, I guess you could say CIS is a spin-off of FAIR...but what's the point?

"In fact, CIS, FAIR, NumbersUSA, Project-USA -- and more than a half-dozen similar groups that Republicans have become disturbingly comfy with -- [...]"

Disturbingly comfy with? COME AGAIN??? We should be so lucky... The GOP has things exactly on track for bringing about a non-white majority in this country in thirty more years, with the last remnants of the white race here to be finally extinguished not too much longer after that -- ten years, maybe? fifteen? fifteen, tops. So, who are the GOP getting disturbingly comfy with? Bush is so comfy with the immigration-reformers he's going to lose his shirt in November as those immigration reformers all vote for Nader, Peroutka, or someone else out of desperation, someone with a triple-digit IQ who actually does things like read newspapers... Yeah, Bush is really comfy with the immigration reformers... moron is gonna take a nosedive in Novermber and drag the whole Republican majority in Congress down with him. But hey, maybe this Alfred E. Newman clone will still have a future after November -- with MAD Magazine (also known as The Wall Street Journal...)

Bayourod writes,

"Sometimes it's difficult to tell which ones are simply racists [...]"

It's not difficult at all, Bayourod: the racists are the race-replacers. You, for example, are a racist -- big time.

It's clear tonight, with the latest primary poll results in and the scattered voter commentary being reported, that 1) Kerry will be the nominee, and 2) he'll take Bush in a walk, beating him easily by at least ten points without even breaking a sweat -- a landslide. Were Bush not so utterly pathetic he'd be tragic -- but someone who is a complete joke, an absolutely incompetent, clueless buffoon, is never the stuff of tragedy. I hope all Bush's and Rove's enablers, the ones who forbade criticism when there was still perhaps time to bring this now-doomed Administration to its senses, are happy with what they've wrought on the nation: a GOP presidency stopped dead in its tracks and replaced with the Dems. No, the enablers simply couldn't understand why the "lesser of two evils" strategy doesn't apply once a certain point has been reached, the point beyond which *both* sides are become intolerable. Intolerable is a word the enablers can't quite grasp the meaning of. Rather than go to the GOP and try to get the word back to Bush that he'd really and truly better cut this crap, they squelched all criticism of the jackass. The enablers just couldn't grasp what we were so unhappy about; why we simply would not be able to vote for Bush no matter who opposed him unless things changed -- hey, when someone has the equivalent of a choice between Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung he runs right out and enthusiastically supports one over the other, right? Of COURSE! He never grumps about a choice like that! The lesser of two evils -- don't you get it? YEAH -- what more could we want than the equivalent of a choice between Lavrenti Beria and Joseph Mengele to get us all excited about picking one over the other on Election Day? Or let's say, a choice between Fidel Castro and Ché Guévara. Wouldn't that make you proud of democracy and get your juices flowing? Wouldn't that particular choice get you in a hot-to-trot voting mood, everyone, raring to take part instead of staying home and just sitting on your hands? I mean, why were we so hard to please, always complaining about the choice we were going to be given, when the choice was the equivalent of one between Adolf Hitler and Adolph Eichmann? Couldn't we wax enthusiastic about "the lesser of two evils" strategy and go happily to the polls on Election Day knowing we were about to keep the greater of two evils -- Hitler or Eichmann -- out of office by putting the other one -- Hitler or Eichmann -- IN office? I mean, SURELY I ought to be able to scrounge up enthusiasm for my favorite if given the equivalent of a choice between Pol Pot and Khieu Sampan! Gee, I can't BELIEVE we actually had the equivalent of a choice between Joseph Goebbels and Alfred Rosenberg AND STILL DIDN'T APPRECIATE IT, SAYING WE COULDN'T VOTE FOR EITHER ONE! What MORE could we want in the way of a choice than that? What was WRONG with us?

Mr. Bush, we have a country. You're not going to destroy it. Our Fathers did not shed blood, did not bequeath us a nation bought and paid for with life, limb, and sacrifice for the foul likes of you to harm but for us to love, keep, and carefully pass down to our grandchildren and theirs, and theirs, and theirs, as our forbears cherished, saved, and handed it down to us more precious than ever inheritance was or could be. It's our legacy, our dearer-than-gold-and-silver, ours to hold not yours to squander, stupid excuse for a man. Now take your soiled Tranzi hands off that which was clean and pure. Pollute it no longer by touching it. Because of you and Karl Rove a line has now been drawn. We are on one side and you, and your brother, and your nephew, and your backstabbing, lying disgrace of a father are on the other forever. Go. Go away. Go to Mexico. Leave. We don't want you here, sad incompetent failure, outrageous destroyer of what was your own country. You are as bad, and as much a traitor, as Bill Clinton. (That's why you never prosecuted him -- you could see absolutely nothing wrong with a single thing he did.)

Every achievement began as a dream, including the ones thought least likely to succeed. The other side keeps winning and ours losing precisely because they dare to translate their dreams into results while we sit here and tell each other we're dreaming. The other side went from almost a standing start some thirty-five years ago to where they are now, more or less in control of society, NOT by telling each other to stop dreaming but by dint of hard work. If this extreme radical left-winger named Bush can't be impeached then let's so hound him that he won't be able to run for a second term, which is exactly the tactic that succeeded with Lyndon Johnson (oh, but excuse me -- those were leftists who did that to Lyndon Johnson, i.e., the side that actually gets things done -- not like us, who sit around hopeless telling ourselves how impossible it is). NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE, certainly not getting rid of a pathetic piece of slime like the excuse for a man currently occupying the White House. Nay-sayers always lose. Only do-ers have any chance of winning anything.

Savage Beast writes,

"No [to the impeachment of George Bush]. All of the alternatives are waaaaaaaaaaaaay off the chart."

Alternatives? But there's only one alternative in case of impeachment: sitting Vice President Cheney. He has his blemishes, to be sure. But I'd take him over Mr. Low-Life Contemptible in a nanosecond.

Wildbill writes, in post #38,

"I have yet to find anyone advocating immediate and total expusion of illegal immigrants who has any workable plan to implement it."

Here's one workable plan, Wildbill, published in last evening's edition of www.Vdare.com :

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/supply_side.htm .

There are about a dozen others out there, all eminently workable and in fact damned easy to implement. The beauty of the best ones is that they get the illegals to "expel" themselves, making 'em just decide to leave and go back home on their own, without being rounded up and kicked out. They'll just melt away. One such was proposed in detail not long about (maybe ten days ago or so) on this site by a Freeper named Sabertooth. It listed "Eighteen Steps Better Than Amnesty for Dealing with Illegals."

There are tons of plans out there for doing it, Wildbill. But you miss the essential point: Pres. Bush is a Tranzi. He doesn't WANT there to be a solution. He WANTS the melding of Mexico, his dearly beloved country, and the U.S., and the wishes of the majority of the American people be damned.

American Man, this post, number twenty-six, is excellent and moving. I agree with what you say in it. As you know, I consider Bush to be contemptible. I strongly favor his removal from office by means of impeachment. Thank you for this very important thread, American Man! Just as you always do at the Poe Forum, you've expressed yourself extremely well here.

Savage Beast, that's his typical modus operandi -- he goes out of his way to stick it to conservatives. The reason is, he's a liberal. Worse, he's a radical left-wing wacko. Get rid of the turd. Impeach him.

President Bush is an extreme left-wing tranzi totalitarian America-hating ex-drunk cocaine addicted illiterate moronic backstabber and traitor to his country who should be impeached without delay for high treason then either imprisoned or banished for life to his beloved Mexico. President Bush is every bit as bad as impeached former "President" Bill Clinton. (American Man, you've done a great job with this post and thread!)

Everyone PLEASE see the following article, a MUST read for those who are still perplexed by Bush's absolutely incredible, unfathomable behavior:

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/bush_thinking.htm

What we've got in the White House is a cross between a Tranzi traitor and a Mexican mafioso, no better or less criminal in his own way than Bill Clinton was in his. This Bush person is NOT a patriotic American and does NOT stand for Americans AT ALL, but for the interests of his family and ONLY the interests of his family. He must be gotten rid of -- must be driven out of office, and pray God he WILL BE driven out!

A draft Tom Tancredo movement has begun in the great state of Tennessee:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002082.html

Why not in the forty-nine other states? I've decided that if they don't get one going in my state I'll just write Tancredo in.

That G.W. Bush is a backstabbing Tranzi who plans on merging Mexico and the United States into a single country is now beyond dispute. There's no reasoning with the man -- he's deaf to all contrary opinions. He'll NEVER stop, or listen to anyone else's opinion about what he plans on forcing down the American people's unwilling throats. Don't anyone even waste their breath trying to get through to him or his stooges and yes-men -- or, for that matter, to his starry-eyed groupies among the general public: they won't listen, and will only blame YOU for "splitting the Republican Party in an election year." This man (make that, this poorest imaginable excuse for a man, this pathetic decades-long drunk and former cocaine user) has to be kicked out of the White House.

Herewith a couple of comments chosen almost at random from among hundreds which anyone here could post, culled from all over the internet (these two happen to be from VFR, www.amnation.com/vfr ):

"Bubba writes that he does not follow Patterico’s argument. I think what Patterico is saying is that once illegals become amnestied, they will in many cases turn to welfare before taking any job at minimum wage or less [one-hundred percent damned right! -- Unadorned note]. The jobs they do not take will be taken by a new crop of illegals [all brought in by Bush, whom Bush would then insist on amnestying all over again, in their tens of millions. -- Unadorned note]. I don’t know if this is true, I just passed it along as an interesting comment. Surely many illegals have flocked to cities like New York where welfare benefits of all types far exceed in value the pay for entry level jobs. I believe this is intentional [of COURSE it is! -- Unadorned note], to create a client class for the Democrat bureaucrat/social service provider patronage machine [Bush works hand-in-glove with the Dems -- always has, always will. -- Unadorned note]. Posted by: thucydides on January 10, 2004 05:43 PM"

" [...] Which brings me back to [Sen.] Feinstein. She has always been decent on immigration, as have a number of other liberals [indeed: Joe Guzzardi; Brenda Walker; many others. -- Unadorned note] and even leftists. Meanwhile some establishment conservatives have been awful — think of Orin Hatch or Sam Brownback. As I mentioned in an earlier post, in LA it is the politically eclectic ‘John and Ken’ that are leading the talk radio charge against this idiocy, whereas the Rushes and Hannitys of the dial ignore it or make idiotic ‘Clinton was worse’ non-arguments. This is an issue where right will have to unite with left against the plutocrats and the ethnic activists. Posted by: Mitchell Young on January 10, 2004 04:01 PM"

[Both comments were in the thread accompanying this Lawrence Auster log entry:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002076.html ]

Sabertooth, I just scoped out your post of the 7th, listing eighteen ways to take care of the illegals problem. If you run for president, friend, you've got my vote, my hefty cash contribution as big as I can possibly make it, and my many months of volunteer footwork in the precincts.

Everyone here -- and every American patriot -- needs to read Sabertooth's post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1053318/posts

Karl Rove and W need to have a copy of it glued to their faces, print side against their eyeballs.

This letter to "View From the Right" ( www.amnation.com/vfr ) explains lots of things:

"Shrewsbury brings up spiritual pride, and this strikes a cord with me regarding GWB. Bush was, from what I can see, something of a drunk and frequent cocaine user who at 40 had a come-to-Jesus moment. Like his worthless brother Neil, he was something of a joke to his Dad and the star of the family, younger brother Jeb. The GWB we see now is the strutting, cocksure, fallen-but-now-saved, inflexible gentleman who is going to save the rest of us from his fate. Posted by: j.hagan on January 10, 2004 03:09 PM"

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002076.html#12253

Sabertooth makes an excellent point, one which gets made way too seldom:

"Since conservative judges are better than liberal judges, why does it make sense to risk more liberal judges by having President Bush sow division in the party over his desire to Amnesty millions of Illegals?"

How come no one blames Bush-the-Backstabber for risking splitting the anti-Dem forces with his psychotic/compulsive need to worship and deify all things Mexican, always placing them over and above the interests of his own country and people? Can't someone get this second-generation Tranzi-in-good-standing traitor to a good shrink or something, instead of sitting by while the nutcase puts the country straight on the path to the election of a Dem president? I mean, why is this guy so sacrosanct in the eyes of so many -- are they mere groupies or something? Why no reprimands by his supporters? Why is on one on his side trying to knock some sense into him?

From Steve Sailer's blog today ( www.iSteve.com ; scroll down):

"A much admired Republican leader emails me: 'Here are about four issues that I am concerned about as a citizen: 1) government is too big and too intrusive: I would like to see it reduced; 2) race preferences need to be totally eliminated; 3) immigration needs to be brought under control; and 4) the education establishment needs to be reduced and contained. [To this, I would add the crying need for fundamental tax reform at the federal level. -- Unadorned] With regard to these four issues, I would ask anyone to tell me whether any of them have been improved as a result of the Bush presidency. I think not. Although I could never bring myself to vote for any of the candidates currently running against Bush [I could -- I'm voting for Howard Phillips, though I could never, it's true, vote for a Dem. -- Unadorned], I am not convinced that with respect to the issues that are of concern to me, things would be demonstrably worse with any of them serving as president with a Republican-controlled Congress."

I say AMEN to that excellent statement!

Voting for someone else in November isn't enough -- I want the insect out now. Thrasymachus has an excellent idea:

http://thrasymachus.typepad.com/thras/2004/01/impeach_bush.html

And here's more Joe Guzzardi, just one among many of his I could post:

http://www.vdare.com/guzzardi/texas_rangers.htm

And be sure to check this out -- here's an example of the way terrorists are identified at U.S. air terminals according to the very strict procedural directives handed down from D.C. by the Bush Administration:

http://thrasymachus.typepad.com/thras/2004/01/orange_alert_at.html#comments

Yeah, this guy Bush is a great terrorism fighter -- ordering guards to randomly frisk old white grandmas and the little white children traveling with them to show how unracist the government is, while letting swarthy twenty-and-thirty-something Arab-looking men traveling alone or in small groups get through unsearched. Yeah, the oh-so-Christian Bush has got a guaranteed spot in heaven for himself, for being so unracist! What a brilliant idea! He and Rove are frickin GENIUSES! Hey, why don't the Israelis adopt that tactic? Yeah -- just let all the guys who are dead-ringers for Mohammad Atta with that psychotic scowl on their face get through unsearched while the security guards are busy proving how unracist they are by detaining and frisking all the white ten-year-olds and strip-searching the young Jewish mothers or the aged Jewish grandmothers the ten-year-olds are traveling with! Yeah, that tactic'll REALLY GET ISRAEL THROUGH THIS IN ONE PIECE!

(... meantime, has anybody had just about enough of this contemptible Tranzi traitor to his country and back-stabber of his supporters, this pathetic unintelligent creep running what amounts to a third Clinton administration?...)

You've got it exactly right, Mark -- they're afraid the people will rise up against THEM next time they try to ram a new piece of crap down people's throats.

... or sexual orientation, for that matter -- I certainly would've voted for Pim Fortuyn.