Free Republic

a place of danger, where travelers must always be on their guard, where savage tribes held sway, a land often as not immersed in a low level of war, either between the tribes or between a tribe and western civilization, and where a man depended on his wits and weapons, and was not able to depend upon the force of law.

Yep.

Malcolm Ten Blvd is only about two miles from here, as the crow flies...

I don't go over that way.

Ever.

.

Why John McCain Hates Republicans Again

Because it is not six months or less to a re-election?

.

That sounds like an SNL skit, "Seniors Breaking Bad"

Python... Hell's Grannies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygy7UDADXDg

But suffice it to say, I didn’t use enough “verys” in describing them. …

How do you know?

Weren't you counting on your fingers "hunny?"

.

Good grief.

You REALLY can’t make this stuff up...

.

Cutting out the fluff...



SCYTL’s electronic pollbook solution will be utilized in small and large election jurisdictions throughout the nation, including in Washington, D.C.; Galveston County, Texas, along with 50 other Texas counties; Kane County, Ill.; and Peoria, Ill.

“We are very excited that our superior platform and unique solution have earned the trust of more than 100 election jurisdictions who have successfully utilized our electronic pollbook in major elections,” said Marc Fratello, CEO of SOE Software.

* * * * * * * * * * *

WND recently reported SCYTL acquired the software division of a non-profit election organization tied to George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

SCYTL said it is purchasing the software division of Gov2U, described as a non-profit organization dedicated to developing and promoting the use of technology in the fields of governance and democracy.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Gov4U is currently partnered with Soros’ Open Society to support and develop a group called the Declaration on Parliamentary Openness.

* * * * * * * * * * *

The group runs a website, OpeningParliament.org,

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Gov4U, meanwhile, has eight partners of its own listed on its website, including the Soros-funded and partnered National Democratic Institute, or NDI.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Aside from receiving financial support for Soros, NDI has co-hosted scores of events along with Soros’ Open Society. The two groups work closely together.

NDI and the Open Society, for example, worked together to push for electoral and legislative reform in Romania.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

NDI previously stated it was founded to draw on the traditions of the U.S. Democratic Party.

WND found that NDI is also listed as the only U.S.-associated organization of Socialists International, the world’s largest socialist umbrella group.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

NDI was originally created by the federally funded National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, which itself founded joint NDI projects with the Open Society. Another NDI financial backer is the United States Agency for International Development, USAID.

.

Winstead served up a speedy apology...

Oh, no need Lizz.

We understood you the first time.



Perfectly.

.

snake fajitas, mmmmmmm...

.

approximate location of your trailer park.”

Two miles north of your jail cell Bill...

.

insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase

Oh, OK.

How about "NO."

I believe that meets the stated criteria...

.

The gallery was probably standing and cheering.

Not probably, they did.

BIG TIME.

.

It’s. The. Law."

We. Don't. Care.

.

I ran this entire scenario back in October. Stevens had a bit of a history with Libya that could have encouraged the actions of Sept 11 but I don’t think it was the real impetus behind the attack.

I don’t know what sources Admiral James Lyons had to draw his “October Surprise” / Blind Sheik conclusion but mine were all linked in the original post.

Post 17

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2951831/posts

Condensed / repaired (at that time)links here...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2951831/posts?page=20#20

Post 20.

Interesting that two totally separate examinations using (I assume) very different sources would come to near identical conclusions.

.

A second appeals court has joined the D.C. Circuit in ruling that President Barack Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were unconstitutional, concluding that some board actions taken in the wake of those appointments were also invalid.

Little bammy will not get it.

Better to tell him he did a "no-no."

.

.

Abuse?
neoooooooo, that’ll never happen.
Just ask `em, they are as pure as the driven slush.

HAHAHAHAHA!

Never heard that one before...

.

entitlement reform

reforming our tax code

Our immigration system

the path toward educational excellence

the energy revolution of the 21st century

.

OK. That is all nice well and good.

It will not work. At least not yet.

Any gains in any of these areas will simply be dog-robbed by the communists claims of credit for that success.

The Republican Party’s Road Back to Victory will occur ONLY when the Republican Party institutes azz-kicking reform.

Not “really good reform” agendas and topics but actual in their face statements of their acts of anti-American agenda.

As in standing up, on the record, staring them in the eyes if they are present or name a specific name or names if they are not and clearly, calmly, and without embellishments accurately state exactly what yet another slimy communist agenda “democrat” has done to besmirch their American heritage and deprive Americans of their Rights and freedoms.

You know, good old fashioned verbal open hand full speed slap that rings their ears and makes them see stars.

The next day, do it again with the next communist agenda “democrat” act.

Continue this process in a loud and deliberate manor is situations where the media can not pretend it did not happen until the communist agenda “democrats” are screaming at the cameras spitting foam and obscenities.

Bring out the underlying seething hatred of the left for America for all to see.

Continue this process with the politicians, then the media stooges, then the catch-phrase, low-info voters themselves.

The leftist agenda can not, nor has it ever been able to stand up to the scrutiny of the bright light of day.

So, that is EXACTLY what the Republican Party should do.

.

All they want to do is have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.”

“That's the line they've developed.”

They've?

Interesting as I am unaware of ANY organized current effort by conservatives to pass legislation to "have their little guns."

That was done at the federal level, Passed by Congress September 25, 1789 and Ratified December 15, 1791.

But of course the slimy communist agenda Stygian Witches can only see what they believe to be reality. Their efforts to deprive American Citizens of their unalienable rights is transformed into the gun owners have "developed a line."

That is the delusional non-reality they exist in.

Senator Loretta Weinberg (D37)

Senator Sandra Cunningham (D31)

Senator Linda Greenstein

.All they want to do is have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.”

I first heard that today as I hardly ever listen to rush on the radio. How long has it been playing? Is it played elsewhere?

Been hearing them here in Dallas for about two weeks.

They are brimming with lies.

.

Coincidences rarely occur in politics, and one cannot ignore the fact that Obama’s trip to Texas comes just on the heels of Governor Perry’s high-profile biotech prospecting mission to the President’s once-home state of Illinois, as well as the Texas Governor’s trip to the Silicon Valley, both of which were considered to be successful in further advancing the migration of technology companies from struggling blue states into Texas. Wielding the bully pulpit, the President may seek to utilize his trip to Texas as a political gambit of sorts

And it is one that everyone here sees right through. little bammy hopes to rub a little Texas success on his scrawny pathetic azz but all this will do is sharpen the contrast between his communism and the Free Market economics that is Texas.

Some words you won’t hear: Battleground Texas, an effort by several Obama campaign veterans to relocate in the state and begin a project aimed at turning reliably Republican Texas blue. Said Carney: “People sometimes in Washington see everything through an electoral lens are true, but I can guarantee you that is not what this is about.”

Right, sure thing Carney. He would lie about a fork left on a table and call it a spoon if he thought it would help The Master, King Hussein.

They are all worse-than-worthless s**t stains with crumblies on America.

./i

Would be gun grabbers are still throwing that 90 percent number around?

Yep and we are going to be seeing it for a long time until some talking head gets burned big-time on a large national TV show by somebody with the following info...

L - I - E.

Actually, TWO lies.

There was only ONE poll (lie #1) and it never asked that question (lie#2).

It contained a vague question regarding only background checks.

38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

"Universal background checks" are NOT background checks.

What the neo-communists want with "Universal background checks" is a cross-linked database that includes medical records, prescription drug records, Military service records, credit scores, grade school and college records, school "resource officers" records, civil judgments, employee drug testing, etc, etc.

Essentially, any scrap of data that can be tied to you. At that point the benevolent shepards in our "most transparent" administration will set the sell / no sell bar as they see fit.

That is not the straightforward "do you have a felony conviction" check.

And the 90% figure?

They are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll from Feb, 2013.

It is a twisting of what was actually asked.

Yeah, I know, SHOCKING, right?

February 7, 2013 - Americans Back Women In Combat 3-1, But Less For Draft, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For Universal Gun Background Checks Is 92%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1847

Demographics...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013_demos.doc

The questions...

Word format
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.doc

PDF format
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.pdf

What is glaringly obvious by it’s absence is the exact description of what comprises a “universal background check” because it never did ask that question.

It also does not differentiate between a private sale and a FFL sale when referring to “gun buyers.”

Here is the actual question...

38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

So of course the question is vague in that it only says “background checks.”

NOT universal background checks.

But when it comes out of the neo-communists’ mouth it has transformed into...

SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSAL GUN BACKGROUND CHECKS IS 92%

Umm, no, that is NOT the question that was asked.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute... Anti-American Citizens rights groups, Washington Examiner, you LIE.

One more thing...

Quinnipiac University
275 Mount Carmel Avenue
Hamden, Connecticut 06518.

.

I would give twenty bucks to see the resulting meltdown from that...

.

Requires those who want to use black or smokeless powder to obtain a “limited” explosives license.

Been there, done that, got the flag...

.

HB872 now in the House in Texas awaiting committee approval before it goes to the full House for a vote.

I think it was replaced by H.B. 1076. HB 1076 has passed the House (with no amendments!) and has been passed to the Senate.

This is where it may need some help from us.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=83R&Bill=HB1076

.

But what about expelling it instead? There is promise in that.”

But here is his error: “Texans have that Lone Star flag all set,” he says. “I think they’re ready to fly solo and lonely once again. Let them go.”

From your lips to The Lord's Golden Ears Tommy boy...

.

AND the range!

The left, immediately, pokes fun of Governor Perry, right in the first sentence.

Yep.

And Texas thinks it is so funny we are laughing all the way to the bank.

:-)

.

Are they edible by humans?

Apparently...

No need, your post made be go back and figure it out.

And then there is the Senate vote...

.

This bill (HB1076) was made completely toothless by Amendment #2 which passed with a 82-31 vote in the House. "

http://www.journals.house.state.tx.us/hjrnl/83r/pdf/83RDAY65FINAL.PDF#page=93

It was tabled, not accepted, not denied. As best as I can tell, "tabled" means no-go here in Texas.

From the remarks on the amendment...

C. TURNER: I see them. So, representative, this bill is political posturing. We have a Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution––

TOTH: In 2008, the case of McDonald v. Chicago , Antonin Scalia, representing the majority of opinion, looked back on a very difficult time in Americans’ history. When slaves, who are now free, were fighting for their freedom again after the Civil War, white––prior white slave owners took guns away from them.

And Antonin Scalia said preservation of the 2nd Amendment was imperative so that they could be free. There are 27 Amendments in the Constitution. And there’s only one that says "shall not be infringed." In this amendment to my bill seeks to keep the attorney general from preserving this right that keeps all people free, and I’d ask that we table it.

"HB 1076 - (consideration continued)

Representative Toth moved to table Amendment No. 2.

The motion to table prevailed by (Record 550): 82 Yeas, 33 Nays, 2 Present, not voting."

The third reading has been done and there has been a vote.

The results of the vote are not yet available.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/Actions.aspx?LegSess=83R&Bill=HB1076#vote121

The non-record vote document appears to be identical to the second reading recorded vote.

The Amendment 2 is from Chris Turner out of Grand Prairie, the same guy that wants to dog-rob the rainy day fund and give it to the Unionists over in the Texas Teachers unions.

Typical jackass. From the other side of his mouth he argues that litigation on HP 1076 would cost too much taxpayer money.

Really Mikey, stick with the guey basketball players, mmm-k?

Governor Palin is way above your league.

.

I would, but she cannot win,imo. The attacks on her would be incredible.

And the communist left all stated Romney was a good candidate for the GOP.

That's why Romney won, right?

.

They're not "donks" they're Jackasses!

Forgive me, I am but a mere undereducated, intellectually challenged, unsophisticated, dirt chewing peasant in the backward State of Texas.

At best, I could manage "asses."

However, they seem to react "strongly" to that one... donk goes right by them unnoticed.

:-)

.

The Hill reports that Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback just signed into law a statute that "bars the federal government from regulating guns and ammunition manufactured and stored within Kansas state lines."

Moreover, the new law makes it a felony for federal authorities to attempt to enforce federal gun control laws, treaties, or rules related to firearms within Kansas state lines. Federal agents would not be arrested but will be prosecuted on "a complaint-and-summons basis."

Time to help Texas get in the game.

Time to make some noise and let the reps know we are watching.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx

http://www.house.state.tx.us/

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/

********** GENERAL STATE CALENDAR **********
HOUSE BILLS
SECOND READING

HB 1076 Toth / Klick / Springer / Phillips / Bonnen, Dennis / et
al.

Relating to certain firearms, firearm accessories and firearm ammunition
within the State of Texas; providing an exemption from federal regulation
and providing penalties.

HB 1314 Creighton / Price / et al.
Relating to the unlawful seizure of a firearm by a governmental officer or
employee; providing penalties.

HB 1304 Sheets / Fletcher / Fallon / Paddie / Isaac / et al.
Relating to the intentional display of a handgun

HB 972 Fletcher / Flynn / Lavender / Burkett / Bell / et al.
Relating to the carrying of concealed handguns on the premises of and
certain other locations associated with institutions of higher education.

The second reading was today. It was pretty rough going for the main bill.

HB 1076 ON SECOND READING

(by Toth, Klick, Springer, Phillips, D. Bonnen, et al.)

HB 1076, A bill to be entitled An Act relating to certain firearms, firearm accessories and firearm ammunition within the State of Texas; providing an exemption from federal regulation and providing penalties.

You can read the actual back and forth word for word here...

http://www.journals.house.state.tx.us/hjrnl/83r/pdf/83RDAY65FINAL.PDF#page=90

Scroll down to page 2448 (no it is not really that big, its just the page numbering)

The donks are trying to zero out the funding for AG Greg Abbot to enforce it, as well as putting in DEA and other fed exemptions in the bill to make it meaningless.

Representative Neva´ rez offered the following amendment to HB i 1076 :
Amend HB 1076 (house committee report) on page 2 of the bill, between lines 7 and 8, by adding the following:
2448 83rd LEGISLATURE — REGULAR SESSION
(f)ii It is an exception to the application of this section that the person ’s seizure of a firearm was:
(1) iiinitiated by the Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force overseen by the United States Department of Justice;
(2) iiinitiated by the Safe Streets Violent Crimes Initiative overseen by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ; or
(3) iipart of a joint initiative between a federal law enforcement agency and any law enforcement agency of:
(A) ii this state; or
(B)iia political subdivision of this state.

This one was tabled. It must have been obvious what was going on.

The other "amendment" (nullification) via defunding was shot down. Representative Toth moved to table Amendment No. 2. The motion to table prevailed by (Record 550): 82 Yeas, 33 Nays, 2 Present, (0) not voting.

It came from yet another donk...

Full Name: Chris Turner
Birthdate: 10-10-1972
Hometown: Grand Prairie
Race: White
Occupation: Public Relations Consultant
Education: B.A., The University of Texas at Austin
Representative Toth moved to table Amendment No. 2.

Folks, this thing might not get through without some real support.

Do we want to join Kansas in standing up to the communist in the White House?

Or will we fail to uphold the proud history of Texas?

It is now out of committee and needs to be scheduled for a vote in the House.

one more time...

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx

http://www.house.state.tx.us/

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/

.

” Magpul employs about 200 people and has been courted by Texas, Wyoming, South Carolina and Utah, to name just a few states eager for its business. Texas Gov. Rick Perry even made a personal appeal to the company. “

Perhaps if Gov. Perry would throw a little hustle into getting this passed the decisions by gun related manufacturers would be a LOT easer.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx

http://www.house.state.tx.us/

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/

********** GENERAL STATE CALENDAR **********
HOUSE BILLS
SECOND READING

HB 1076 Toth / Klick / Springer / Phillips / Bonnen, Dennis / et
al.
Relating to certain firearms, firearm accessories and firearm ammunition
within the State of Texas; providing an exemption from federal regulation
and providing penalties.

HB 1314 Creighton / Price / et al.
Relating to the unlawful seizure of a firearm by a governmental officer or
employee; providing penalties.

HB 1304 Sheets / Fletcher / Fallon / Paddie / Isaac / et al.
Relating to the intentional display of a handgun

HB 972 Fletcher / Flynn / Lavender / Burkett / Bell / et al.
Relating to the carrying of concealed handguns on the premises of and
certain other locations associated with institutions of higher education.

.

Okay, this is satire, right?

No, it is seeing a ghost. It is rumor-bait.

Little bammy hussein obama said a lot of crap but he never said bring guns to America.

Here is what he said...

And we also recognize that most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States. (Applause.) I think many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms, and as President I swore an oath to uphold that right and I always will. But at the same time, as I’ve said in the United States, I will continue to do everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people. That can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It’s the right thing to do. (Applause.) So we’ll keep increasing the pressure on gun traffickers who bring illegal guns into Mexico. We’ll keep putting these criminals where they belong — behind bars.

That is not at all "Obama took a bold first step as he guaranteed a large Mexican audience full of future American citizens that they would be allowed to keep all the guns they could carry across the border."

We do not need such rumor-bait here on FR.

.

” Perry was introduced with a comically over-the-top video of himself showing great manliness while shooting at targets and wearing safety equipment. “

Looks like Yahootie “News” has wet their panties over Governor Perry’s day at the range

Good. Maybe they will get diaper rash.

In the meantime the politrickcions need to get off their butts and get this stuff passed.

Right now they seem to be totally absorbed in spending the rainy day fund on water legislation.

That is important, yes, but so is safeguarding the Second Amendment Rights of American Citizens in the State of Texas.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx

http://www.house.state.tx.us/

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/

********** GENERAL STATE CALENDAR **********
HOUSE BILLS
SECOND READING

HB 1076 Toth / Klick / Springer / Phillips / Bonnen, Dennis / et
al.
Relating to certain firearms, firearm accessories and firearm ammunition
within the State of Texas; providing an exemption from federal regulation
and providing penalties.

HB 1314 Creighton / Price / et al.
Relating to the unlawful seizure of a firearm by a governmental officer or
employee; providing penalties.

HB 1304 Sheets / Fletcher / Fallon / Paddie / Isaac / et al.
Relating to the intentional display of a handgun

HB 972 Fletcher / Flynn / Lavender / Burkett / Bell / et al.
Relating to the carrying of concealed handguns on the premises of and
certain other locations associated with institutions of higher education.

.

Well, that is great and all that.

Maybe they will get off their butts and get this stuff passed.

Right now they seem to be totally absorbed in spending the rainy day fund on water legislation.

That is important, yes, but so is safeguarding the Second Amendment Rights of American Citizens in the State of Texas.

Who is my my legislator?
http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Home.aspx

http://www.house.state.tx.us/

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/

********** GENERAL STATE CALENDAR **********
HOUSE BILLS
SECOND READING

HB 1076 Toth / Klick / Springer / Phillips / Bonnen, Dennis / et
al.
Relating to certain firearms, firearm accessories and firearm ammunition
within the State of Texas; providing an exemption from federal regulation
and providing penalties.

HB 1314 Creighton / Price / et al.
Relating to the unlawful seizure of a firearm by a governmental officer or
employee; providing penalties.

HB 1304 Sheets / Fletcher / Fallon / Paddie / Isaac / et al.
Relating to the intentional display of a handgun

HB 972 Fletcher / Flynn / Lavender / Burkett / Bell / et al.
Relating to the carrying of concealed handguns on the premises of and
certain other locations associated with institutions of higher education.

The second reading is tomorrow.

We need to see to it that they are brought to a vote and that we are watching HOW they vote.

.

The Salon has spoken!

The earth will bend to the will of The Salon!

.

By contrast, the South leads in all the negative trends. The South has the highest infant mortality rate (because we don't abort them all). It has the most traffic deaths (we still drive cars). It leads the country in gun deaths (we still own guns). It has the greatest number of obese people (we still can afford food). It has the highest rate of diabetes (we can still afford too much food!). It has the largest number of people dying from stroke—a broad swath of the southeastern United States is known as the “stroke belt” (we like food that has actual flavor). The South has the highest rates of cognitive decline (according to their "adjusted" numbers).

From the next paragraph...

Risk of cognitive impairment was 18 percent higher in residents of the Stroke Belt than in those living in non-Belt states after adjusting for the influences of age, sex, race, and education level.

Education? Race?

Whoo boy, that is some thin ice Mr. Lee!

I thought we are all identical under the no-longer-noticed skin color, Mr. Lee.

And did you bother to offer the methodology for the study? No?

There is a good reason for that...

Research presented at medical meetings should be considered preliminary until it is published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Quoting un-reviewed material Mr. Lee? Tisk, tisk.

But this part is my absolute favorite from the entire shtick.

Interestingly, though the South is home to the major tobacco companies and to carcinogenic Coca-Cola, the highest incidence of many types of cancer happens to be in the North. Which just proves that the stress of living alongside the Confederacy is now seriously affecting our health.

So YOUR high cancer rates are OUR fault?

Those EEE-VILE Johnny Rebs...

Yeah... gotcha.

But putting that aside, by all means Mr. Lee, we would welcome you and others like you to put as much distance between yourselves and our home as you can possibly achieve.

You may begin packing anytime, Mr. Lee.

.

The last part was best...

(T.C. to go-pees...)

“Well there is an alternative (for you), you could just NOT BE a bunch of squishes.”

HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH !

.

An enraged Barack Obama lashed out at Congress and "willing liars" who defeated efforts to expand federal gun control laws.

"Willing liars."

Yeah, THAT's Presidential, huh?

Throwing a tantrum on TV because he can't get rid of a Constitutional right for all American Citizens because HE doesn't like it ranks right up there with a third grade playground bully.

What a screeching bitch...

.

The way we treat our friends (nope) and neighbors (no illegals, I checked) who are undocumentedmove out of the shadows (start voting democrat) – transcends (amnesties) the issue of immigration status (which is the COLLECTION of various laws the criminal illegal aliens have violated).

If Eric the Ho had a scintilla of residue that at some point in it's existence could have been laughingly referred to as “honesty” he could possibly utter the above statement with the proper corrections.

Squadrons of pigs will simultaneously become airborne too.

BTW, here is the damn “mechanism for them to earn citizenship.”

Yeah, it is harder than hopping a fence or swimming a river in the middle of the night, then sticking your hand out for welfare, food stamps and medical care paid for by REAL American Citizens.

There is a GOOD reason it is hard.

. The way we treat our

"There are no legal guns in Papua New Guinea. Only police and Army are allowed guns. that is why the guns are homemade and they carry machetes, axes, spears, bows and arrows. The criminals however usually hunt in packs of no less than four so a single person is seriously outmanned".

In other words, decent people don't have a chance.

Yes they do. They are just not pissed off yet because nothing has happened to them, personally.

When the "Common Sense Gun Universal Test for Sanity (GUTS) background check system is giving the neo-comunists "justification" for confiscation of all firearms from "92%" of the owners after passage in the 2022 Congress the remaining real American Citizens will have nothing left to lose.

Debt will be over 40 Trillion, health care will be a veterinarian level, "immigration" forms will be one page, same day, 20 dollar fee, 67% income tax on "the rich" (over 50k) and all of this will exist because the go-pees haven't got a ounce of nuts between them.

They will be busy conducting war with "disruptive conservatives." And faggots like little bammy hussein will be screeching to "news" cameras during the breaks from their mutual hump sessions that wanting gunz iz mentally unstable.

Sound far fetched?

That is only nine years from now.

.

Three point six minutes of work a week.

Yeah, sounds about right...

.

overwhelming public support for universal background checks, which many national polls put at near 90 percent approval — to pressure lawmakers.

L - I - E.

Actually, TWO lies.

There was ONE poll (lie #1) and it never asked that question (lie#2).

It contained a vague question regarding only background checks.

38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

"Universal background checks" are NOT background checks.

What the neo-communists want with "Universal background checks" is a cross-linked database that includes medical records, prescription drug records, Military service records, credit scores, grade school and college records, school "resource officers" records, civil judgments, employee drug testing, etc, etc.

Essentially, any scrap of data that can be tied to you. At that point the benevolent shepards in our "most transparent" administration will set the sell / no sell bar as they see fit.

That is not the straightforward "do you have a felony conviction" check.

And the 90% figure?

They are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll from Feb, 2013.

It is a twisting of what was actually asked.

Yeah, I know, SHOCKING, right?

February 7, 2013 - Americans Back Women In Combat 3-1, But Less For Draft, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For Universal Gun Background Checks Is 92%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1847

Demographics...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013_demos.doc

The questions...

Word format
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.doc

PDF format
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.pdf

What is glaringly obvious by it’s absence is the exact description of what comprises a “universal background check” because it never did ask that question.

It also does not differentiate between a private sale and a FFL sale when referring to “gun buyers.”

Here is the actual question...38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

So of course the question is vague in that it only says “background checks.”

NOT universal background checks.

But when it comes out of the neo-communists’ mouth it has transformed into...

SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSAL GUN BACKGROUND CHECKS IS 92%

Umm, no, that is NOT the question that was asked.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute... Anti-American Citizens rights groups, New York Times, you LIE.

One more thing...

Quinnipiac University
275 Mount Carmel Avenue
Hamden, Connecticut 06518.

.

No, really, that’s ok. No bad on your part.

I take every opportunity I find to inform folks of the twisted crap the neo-communists spew.

It appears that the 90% BS will be spewed for quite some time so the more folks see the explanation of what they did, the better the odds that some mouthy communist sympathizer talking head will sound off in front of someone that is ready for them.

And then the spanking will commence...

.

It would simply have expanded criminal background checks to include guns sold at gun shows and via the Internet, a step supported by 90 percent of Americans, according to polls.

W R O N G.

The very wording is a contradiction.

"Universal background checks" are NOT background checks.

What the neo-communists want with "Universal background checks" is a cross-linked database that includes medical records, prescription drug records, Military service records, credit scores, grade school and college records, school "resource officers" records, civil judgments, employee drug testing, etc, etc.

Essentially, any scrap of data that can be tied to you. At that point the benevolent shepherds in our "most transparent" administration will set the sell / no sell bar as they see fit.

That is not "do you have a felony conviction" check.

Current law already does that.

And the 90% figure?

They are referring to the Quinnipiac University poll from Feb, 2013.

It is a twisting of what was actually asked.

Yeah, I know, SHOCKING, right?

February 7, 2013 - Americans Back Women In Combat 3-1, But Less For Draft, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For Universal Gun Background Checks Is 92%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling- institute/nat ional/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1847

Demographics...

http: //www.quinn ipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013_demos.doc

The questions...

Word format
http://www. quinnipiac. edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.doc

PDF format
http://www. quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/us/us02072013.pdf

What is glaringly obvious by its absence is the exact description of what comprises a universal background check because it never did ask that question.

It also does not differentiate between a private sale and a FFL sale when referring to "gun buyers."

Here is the actual question...

38. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?

So of course the question is vague in that it only says "background checks."

NOT universal background checks.

But when it comes out of the neo-communists' mouth it has transformed into...

SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSAL GUN BACKGROUND CHECKS IS 92%

Umm, no, that is NOT the question that was asked.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute... little bammy, assorted neo-communists, you lie.

.

One more thing...

Quinnipiac University
275 Mount Carmel Avenue
Hamden, Connecticut 06518

.