So, what is the truth here? Are migrants eating pets or not?
**********
Democrats are getting away with turning this into an issue of what the Haitians really eat rather the burdens they impose on legitimate residents.
...It’s a cultural thing not a hunger thing. That alone doesn’t make them bad people.
*******
Exactly. The real problem is that their illegal migration into the USA was a disaster for the people who were already here. The direct welfare expense. The environmental cost (crowded parks, crowded roads, overuse of utilities, etc.). The increased housing prices. Any more??
Trump is probably working-off his negatives by staying on message and letting articulate supporters like Vance and Tulsi deal with side issues. Hope he doesn’t blow it by renewed name calling and personal attacks.
09/19/2024 6:28:42 AM PDT
· 14 of 37 Socon-Econ
to Presbyterian Reporter
According to the Bible, the “Shining City on the Hill” is the New Jerusalem. It does not occur until the Lord returns. Before then, contrary to what the religious Marxists claim, the nation state continues.
Trump needs to make himself less out in the open and vulnerable, at least until the election is over. And Vance needs to do likewise — and armor-up and be ready to shoot.
The Democrats want voters focused on the race of the illegals and whether they are actually eating pets. But the real problem is their huge welfare cost and environmental degredation. The migration is great for the migrants but a rotten deal for the people who are already here.
The Supreme Court will need to step in. Institutionalized vote cheating is a civil rights violation and a denial of equal protection of the law. The Constituion does not give the states an unrestricted right to cheat.