05/08/2024 12:29:13 PM PDT
· 51 of 54 sipow
to Blue Highway
There was - but it was over a decade ago. It was around 2012 when they started allowing trans. Well - at least it was around then when they started promoting the fact that they were doing it.
There was a fight for a few years but it died off. My guess is that most people who cared pulled their daughters out. I can’t imagine any Christian family exposing their daughters to that today.
05/01/2024 3:52:53 AM PDT
· 12 of 20 sipow
to Morgana
The one thing that makes this not believable is that she would have been 47 at the time. That would have been about 35 years too late to catch the attention of Pedo Joe.
04/30/2024 10:53:21 AM PDT
· 17 of 17 sipow
to piasa
No, look again.
From one paragraph:
According to the law, the process will be carried out by the state's Department of Correction, but it cannot be conducted more than a week before a person's prison sentence ends.
From the next paragraph:
Cascio said, "It has to be done no later than one week prior to his release date, so they could do it immediately or they could wait."
The first says "cannot be conducted more than a week before" and the second says "no later than one week prior" and "they could do it immediately".
04/29/2024 7:49:38 PM PDT
· 8 of 17 sipow
to mmichaels1970
The article is poorly written.
One paragraph says that it can not be done earlier than one week before his release. The next paragraph says it must be done not later than one week before his release and could be done immediately.
Trump has greatly reduced his chances of winning with this.
It can and will get spun every which way there is. But in the end it is going to come across to a large group as capitulation to the Democrats. And that is going to hurt.
Setting up a vote where the Dems are 100% united and the Republicans are split almost 50/50 does not feel like what it takes to maintain the majority in 2024.
04/22/2024 8:17:21 AM PDT
· 36 of 40 sipow
to Mariner
Everyone of them needs to be voted out.
I know it is too late to primary them in a couple states, but it is still possible in the vast majority of states. A strong lesson needs to be laid down.
04/22/2024 5:20:04 AM PDT
· 27 of 45 sipow
to Morgana
It is a good article overall. The 14th amendment argument falls a bit short due to the wording (born) in that amendment.
The best point made is in the third argument. The absolute lack of logic of allowing abortion exceptions in the case of a crime (rape/incest) or potential birth defects is ridiculous.
The unborn child is the ultimate innocent life. How can we condemn an innocent to death because of a crime committed by a parent? Killing a baby does not erase the rape or change the trauma the mother went through.
Likewise with the predicted birth defects. If someone suggested euthanizing all mentally or physically disabled people, everyone would be up in arms about that. Abortion for the reasons is no different.
There is no logical or moral reason to allow abortion in either of these cases.