Don’t disagree — at least that the NYT would play fast and loose with any language that could be interpreted as undermining conservative principles — but whether the NYT puts their spin on what PF said or mainstream Catholic outlets strain to spin it as nothing new here (which I flatly reject — PF is the equivalent of having Obama in the Vatican), PF, unless he is patently naive or stupid, knew that his comments would be jumped on and presented in precisely this way. Just as the narratives that “Republicans are for the rich” and “Democrats are for the poor” remain unshakable despite the clear, abundant and easily accessible facts to the contrary, so has PF ensured that “the Church must change” will be the tagline for the Church in the public mind. The cover of Newsday today features a large photo of PF’s face over the triumphant cry, “the Church must change”. Try to explain what he “really meant”, try to parse it, try nuance, try to show people why it’s no different from what previous popes have said, etc. Does not matter. PF said what he said, he knew what he was saying, he knew how it would be spun, he intended it. What is most striking to me, as a devout Catholic, is his observation that the Church will collapse if it doesn’t change. Where has he been? The Catholic Church has been collapsing for decades now. And the liberals who have been wielding the sledgehammers causing this collapse believe, like all good liberals (see e.g., the Democrat party, Obama, Pelosi, Bill deBlasio, anyone in government in the state of NY, NJ, MA), that the answer is even bigger doses of the same degeneracy. So, yes, the NYT was twisting his words, but PF knew that they would say exactly what they’ve been saying and everyone would remember precisely what has been drilled into their minds in the last 24 hours: “the Church must change” If PF didn’t know this, the RC Church has bigger problems than the NYT.,