“How Islam progressively takes over countries...”
What Pete Hammond is doing is illustrating the tools that are used to proliferate the sect. I agree with him that Islam is not a religion, but it is a sect.
A sect is defined as a group of people with somewhat different religious beliefs (typically regarded as heretical) from those of a larger group to which they belong....I.E. anti-Jewish and anti-Christian.
He further states that Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components. But I think he cart/horses this as all the listed things hidden by the beard of religion had to be in existence for the “plan” to work. Without them, the muslims would be forced back into their respective areas just like what was done to Israel with the Jews. And there is no country that is the recognized “home” of Islam.
Starting in the third century, they just rode in and captured their empire. They can’t do that today and have learned to use the other tactics to accomplish their gains. And they are using politics better than the socialists are. They have learned from history like the Russian Tzars, Hitler, Japan, the modern day British empire, and others who have hidden the takeover agenda behind politics using it to protect themselves with what they call religion. And unlike Hammond’s thoughts, the execution of the plan has switched roles. It used to be religion protected them. Now it’s the failures of governments to protect their religious agenda which is now out in the open.
Don’t be fooled, they have an agenda, and it is the same as it has been for thousands of years, world domination, just like the others mentioned above.
Hammond’s book was published in 2006 and he passed in 2011. Perhaps if he was alive today, he would have seen the transition. Everything that lasts, evolves.
rwood