Free Republic

That elevated platform has been used on her campaign trail to give her an excuse to have help moving as soon as she stops talking. She seems to “freeze” in place and can’t turn and walk away without help. By making a point of getting on and off a platform with gallant help from nearby men, she conceals her problems with mobility. Instead of being frozen in place and having someone walk up and tow her away from her mic, she has someone walk up and “help the lady down” from that big bad platform.
Notice she wasn’t 5’ 4” inches until now? No height issues during previous elections.

Well, the government made it illegal for “unauthorized” doctors to report on the health of/treat individuals from Fukushima so we won’t know until much later. In Chernoble, it was illegal for physicians to rule that cause of death was related to radiation - so people dropped like flies, including physicians exposed to radiation victims, and it was always attributed to other causes.
There are victims of Fukushima who initially went on phone camera video talking about the families’ bleeding noses, teeth falling out, exhaustion immediately after Fukushima had 3 containment failures (3 full melt-downs) and radioactive fuel was blown sky high and then rained down often as radioactive cesium encased in microspheres of glass, but Japan made it illegal for citizens to blog about such things -they called it “fear mongering” and so the stories abruptly ended - which is what Japan wanted. Yes- their freakish official who went around telling pregnant women that if they smiled they and their babies would not be affected by radiation was among those who bragged that “Japan has learned the lessons of Chernobyl.” So - complete and complicit media silence. We won’t know the toll until latter. For those who doubt that people are suffering tragically from this latest incompetence on the part of the nuke industry, and the government(s) who guard it, ask yourself why nuclear medicine in the US always treats nuclear scientific evidence as “real” and therefore asks patients to sign a medical release acknowledging that exposure to radiation increases chances of cancer and other illnesses.
Or read about Chernobyl yourself - there are international reports that said “All instances of disease increased immediately after the Chernobyl event” because radiation works to suppress immunity - so suddenly people were dying of diseases that they would otherwise recover from - exposure suppresses immunity and then people sicken and die from cancer, leukemia, infections and many otherwise treatable diseases.

Leg braces or Michael Jackson’s patented “Gravity Boots”?

Gravity boot link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7TzMbRGm5M

I don’t believe she wants a stepstool to make her look closer in height to Trump. WHen she and Biden spoke at a campaign location, the microphone was adjusted for the VP candidate’s height, not hers. That’s suspicious right there.
So after Biden spoke, they brought up a platform and place it next to the mic and “petite” little Hillary stepped up and spoke a few minutes. When she turned to leave, naturally people rushed forward to help her down. Only problem is, microphone stands have been adjustable for many many years. If Biden spoke first, when he concluded, someone would walk up and slide the microphone down on the stand to match her height without using a booster platform.

THe platform or booster she wants is only needed because she freezes up when standing and has problems beginning to move. Without a booster to stand on, she can’t turn and walk away without looking awkward. Nope, she needs people to rush to her side and “help her” and the booster stand was only a cover for that. WHAT will she do without it????

I appreciate your research. :)

I misread it - my mistake. Thanks, Freeper.

Thanks for the education - I hadn’t seen that before. My mistake...don’t draw on me... :)

I really didn’t expect that.
But, she usually raises money through pay-to-play scams and her fake charity and other under the table means which means she doesn’t have to get her hands dirty with normal fund raising. The Saudi’s are her #1 fans.......

“Deplorable chumps.”

_____________________________

GOOD CATCH!

Yes - there’s a smirking little comment by her that says when she watches Trump, she’ll be thinking of a chimp named Eddie. Not Matilda or Wanda - Eddie.
Thanks for searching it up. Huffpo is really taking out all they stops to prop up the mule Huma is using to carry her into the Sec of State position captured in WIkileaks!

LOL!

Didn’t know we could link HUFFPO. Thanks!

Not really an apples to apples comparison because “dangerous candidate” doesn’t list either contender - results are anti trump.
But you searched a specific candidate and a specific name of a corrupt ruler and got those results.

Typing a neutral search like “Trump” shouldn’t result in bad photos and top stories that are anti. The wild article falsely accusing him of child rape was an old article in which the author bitter complained that the MSM would even followed up on (wow - even they didn’t pretend to believe the accusation)- yet it’s in the top results? Google must be searching for most repulsive articles regardless of their algorithm. There’s TONS of articles about Hillary’s corruption (e.g., all the WIkileaks) and that’s not on the top of her search results page?

Get a load of the "Editor's Note" at the bottom of the article: "Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S."

Unbelievable that the editor's note was written by the Associate Editor, HuffPost Hawaii. Liberal "journolists"(sic) really believe they are a royal priesthood.

I saw one true exception that Google is sure to scrub soon in which Clinton is "chosen" as the most dangerous candidate:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/08/no_author/dangerous-candidate/

The other link that seems to indicate Hillary is the more dangerous candidate is just a Bernie Sanders letter to the editor.

Yes - they are proud of their betrayal of our country and their “professional ethics.” Tonight all this trash is making me more somber than usual about how far our country’s leadership, morals, and media have fallen and that is saying something.
I remember reading an article about a well-positioned Repub who was to meet with an MSM outlet and instead of meeting with top-level staff as initially arranged, he was met by a bored lackey. “Lackey” sat there ignoring him for the most part until the repub commented on it. Then “Lackey” stood up and snarled that the media was the moral conscience of the public! They are so foul and proud of it AND they think they are a priesthood. This is not my father’s media! I was too young to understand Walter Cronkite but I didn’t detect the stench of proud prostitution that our modern day media puts out.

Correction to my post:
“Then I searched “Donald Trump” and the top 5 links were generally scary and some may consider the pictures LESS flattering.”

Looking again - Hillary’s google page makes her look healthy and the photos are airbrushed, retouched photo-shopped campaign material of smiling and Trump’s are un-posed, untouched, unflattering photos of half-expressions that could be seen as smirking or smug.

Huma must be freaked out that her political mule is near collapse short of the finish line.

And the post by Sheila dated September 17, 2016 at 5:10 pm wherein the lady asserts that Trump’s base is Angry White Males and that they will be emboldened to commit violent crimes against people of color, Muslims, and Jews and she goes on to cite a study from UC San Bernadino stating hate crimes against Muslims are up 78% from 2015 and that “many researchers” attribute this increase to Trump?????

Did you see this post at the link:

Posted by Ted vaill says

September 17, 2016 at 5:45 pm

Trump will get assassinated. He will reap what he is sowing…

______I’m sure the SS will be right on the trail! /s

Reading the comments to the twitter link, the lib tweets are strangely childlike (almost “I know you are, but what am I?”) - probably because they can’t think of how to legitimately defend her and they are used to drawing psychological ego support by presenting liberals as better in all respects. She’s making their team look bad.

OKAY so there’s a celebrity height comparison website that says this about Hill’s dimensions:
“Hillary Clinton height is around 5ft 6 in 167 cm. Hillary Clinton weighs nearly 132 lbs or 60 kg. As of 2016, she is 68 years old.”

THen the Washinton Times (May 2016) has an article snickering that Hill’s campaign is now claiming she’s 5’ 7” despite her campaign’s earlier claims that she’s 5’4” or 5’5 in order to better compete with the public image of Trump who is 6’ 2”. The suggestion is that historically taller people win the presidency so they exaggerate her height - was this the preparation for height disparity issues in photographs and public appearances or Hill is really lying about one more thing?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/23/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-matchup-set-to-test-s/

Since Churchhill had doubles, then her campaign will say she had to use doubles because the “crazy” “bitter clingers” were recently driven over the edge by her “deplorables” comment. Maybe that’s the real reason for her making that statement at all - pose an elevated risk and haul out a double. The picture of the woman show shaking Hillary’s hand helps this ruse - they can prove she wasn’t in the right place at the right time and therefore dismiss ALL double talk as crazy. And that picture (shaking hands) may have been Hill’s first response to learning that she had MS years ago - she knew she’d have tremors etc. and maybe they started this game long ago before anyone would consider a double possible.
But that photo in front of Chelsea’s is too slender to be her and is probably either taller or shorter and they couldn’t hide it well with Hill in flats so they made sure to keep people away. If anyone knows the standard width of those sidewalk tiles - they could be used to estimate this person’s height and measure her profile in hard numbers to compare with Hill.

The possible double is petite compared with Hillary. Even f she wore high heels, the possible double is on a smaller scale in face and form. I am thinking that part of the reason “Hillary” was seen walking alone and conversing with a child is that, if it’s a double, they didn’t want her to stand next to an SS agent or ANYONE else routinely in her entourage because the disparity in size would stand out at a glance. For example, they couldn’t put that double next to Huma very well - easy to note the smaller height and witdh, length of face if you stand her next to “known” people.
Having “Hillary” greet a child helps conceal the change in scale - it would need to be someone not likely to stand next to Hill again.
It should be easy to estimate the height of that woman for those trained to analyze photos - like measuring known objects in the picture and comparing the height of the known object to that of the woman.
THis potential double could wear heels but that would shorten the length of her “footprint” alot and it would slow her walk to shorter strides. Real Hill would not be wearing high heels - she was wearing ballerina flats when she collapsed and that’s largely because of her age and her physical struggle not to fall down.
And I do think the SS might not guard a double because they are not obligated to do so, but if it was posed as a security risk to have real Hill display her “health” by walking alone to playfully greet a child, they might support a limited tolerance for a double. But there’d have to be a limit - can’t have SS in on the fraud, it’d have to be posed as necessary security (e.g., false accusations made up by her campaign alleging known Republican “bitter clingers” or “deplorables” posing a threat to her survival.

Even though I’m suffering from Hillary-theory fatigue (to which I have been a contributor), my eyes turn back in horror to the pics of the possible body double. Are we really that Soviet now? I found a gallery of pictures and I pause on the possible double, and one front on photo really doesn’t look like the real ‘Beest
( http://heavy.com/news/2016/09/hillary-clinton-body-double-conspiracy-theory-compare-before-after-911-photos-evidence-dead-impersonator/2/ )

That photo is from an article ridiculing such theories - and then the pictures don’t look right to me....*sigh* Perhaps the last of my credulity will die before she does.

(http://heavy.com/news/2016/09/hillary-clinton-body-double-conspiracy-theory-compare-before-after-911-photos-evidence-dead-impersonator/2/)

I’d like to think some Libs might just get a little bit tired of being defrauded. Look at the scale of the conspiracy going on to prop her up - all aids, handlers, politicians, movie people, and of course her electronic in-kind-campaign contribution - the MSM. This is like the Potemkin villages of the Soviet era and our MSM is now state controlled!

The problem being there are alot of people not in their “right mind.” Reading some raving lib sites, some commenters said they didn’t believe she was ill, and even if she was they’d still vote for her. And even if she died they’d vote for her because anything else is a vote for Trump.”

I recall that in the Soviet Union, ordinary classical music on the radio would abruptly be replaced with dirge-like music and everyone would start asking each other who fell backward into the path of a bullet at rest.

*clap on the back*
*grin*

And they are going to have a central website named something catchy...you know...like....PRAVDA

I gotta hope there’s enough decency among the Bernie-ites that they would reject DNC’s replacement after they were lied to and the entire party disgraced itself by propping her up like this. Her VP mate is in on this complete fraud - the Bernie-ites should hate him as much as we do because he is betraying our country with this farce. Leave it to DNC to claim that the constitutional requirements are now an obsolete “living document” that needs to be rewritten in order for the media and the DNC to select our next “ruler.”
Remember that? Obama’s staff said he was “ready to rule.”

I rode on horseback on a deceptively hot summer morning for 1.5 hours. When I got off the horse, my legs did not support my weight for even a moment and I wilted all the way to the ground as if boneless. Once there, I had no ability to sit up or move away from the shifting hooves of a bored horse. At no time did I have any body rigidity that she shows in this video.

With her medical history - how wise is it for her staff to assume that no treatment is needed to address pre-existing conditions (blood clots) or the new claim that she had pneumonia? She keels over at a public even when she has no record of ever having done so in years of public appearances in warm/hot days and her handlers rule out any possible complication and just slap her face a little in the van until she revives and then they drive her on to her daughters house to go on with her social schedule????

Let me guess that they already equipped CHelsea’s house with full medical suite so she can go “visit” whenever she has a “chance”?

Someone up-thread commented that she wore a “table cloth” to prior events to hide a cooling vest worn by MS patients and helpfully provided a link. The link was inoperable so I hunted up the brand name suggested and it looks like it could have been what was under her clothing at those events where she wore baggy clothing unfavorably compared to furniture slipcovers and vacumn cleaner bags. Here’s a link that works. http://www.activemsers.org/firstlinetechstndvest.html

Right away I can see that the need for a cooling vest to hug the body in order to cool it, would be a problem for Hillary. In this picture - it’s designed for a man so she’d have to wear more “vest” than otherwise needed just to cover her bust. And she’s gained weight. Best explanation for that bizarrely baggy housecoat outfits she wore earlier.

How will they explain it if she has a spell at the debate and starts twerking on stage?!
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Sadly, that response (and image) has resulted in particles of watermelon adhering to my computer keyboard! I THINK I was laughing when it happened.

That is NOT a $5000.00 shoe! Is it REALLY??
___________________________________________

Actually it’s a glass slipper left by a fairy princess...uh...an enchanted creature...um...a hobgoblin fleeing the stroke of...well...just a stroke.

Someone at DUmmicraticUnderground suggested that she may have fainted because she spent too much time on the Stairmaster or other gym equipment at the last hotel she stayed in. I kid you not, that is what was sincerely put forth as a likely explanation for her collapse today.

Just watched a video by a (brave) doctor analyzing public information about Hillary’s health issue (video clips, etc.) He said that her coughing is compatible with a swallowing difficulty common to late stage Parkinson’s. Chronic difficulty swallowing from Parkinsons directs saliva incorrectly and over time, can result in pneumonia.

Alot of flop sweat in this article from Forbes. I went to the garbage dump (DemocraticUnderground) to see what the looney left was saying about Hillary's collapse at the 9/11 service today. The Dummies are offering comments about how groomsmen are known to faint at weddings etc. and they linked to this article at Forbes as "solid proof" as in "the science is settled." In particular, the Dummies were adamant that a "hard right" publication like Forbes offers true proof that Hillary's collapse was nothing to see - move along.

So - if anyone has a moment, can you enlighten me re Forbes? Doesn't seem hard right to me - is it just this looney journalist at Forbes or is all of Forbes lefty now?

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HEhehehehehehehehehe!!!
mmmheh.....mmmmmheh...
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA...heheheh heh

Yuppers. The judge did make the point that we deplorables are just "desparate for change" (per Hillary's condescending description of the other half of the Republicans not encompassed by "deplorable") Relevant part of the transcript of the Judge's video response to Hillary's "deplorables." By the way, Hill's voice sounds sick in the excerpted video. "I am a friend and supporter of Donald Trump. And Donald Trump is now neck and neck with Hillary Clinton. So Hillary is basically calling a huge portion of America "deplorable" and "irredeemable." Now, I don't consider myself "deplorable", but since you started it, Hillary , let's have at it. Hillary, You bow to and take money from countries who throw gays off buildings, you take money for your "so-called" charity from countries that don't allow women to drive, a "so-called" feminist who support countries that force women to cover every part of their bodies but their eyeballs, and You want to call us Islamophobes? On the eve of the 15th anniversary of 9/11, if I'm from Lower Manhattan, San Bernadino, or Orlando, and I'm afraid of Muslim jihadist, I'm an Islamophobe? Hilary, it sounds pretty reasonable to be fearful of them to me. And You, You, Hillary, the Queen of Black Lives Matter, You want to cal Me a racist? And you continue to trash-talk the Trump supporters Hey Hillary, You got that one right. We are desperate for change, and You sure ain't it. You are as establishment as it gets, and yes, were fed up with Your kind of government. Where the Attorney General secretly meets with Your husband while You're the target of an active, criminal investigation, with no less than 100 FBI agents, and You come out days later promising that You'll keep her on as Attorney General if you become president. You're right, we're fed up with kind type of government, where the destruction of subpoenaed evidence with hammers, and BleachBit and delete buttons are tolerated, where you simply ignore subpoenas and you destroy federal documents, where the head of the FBI, when called upon to explain before congress, why you are not being charged with a myriad of federal felonies is so out-classed and so out-lawyered that a five-year-old could write an indictment based upon federal crimes, You're, Hillary, so right. We are fed up. And Hillary, since You started the name-calling, Hillary You are a liar, and a pathological one at that. You're a cheat, You're dishonest, You're condescending, You are arrogant, contemptuous, and if you think that Your half-assed apology will wipe the slate clean, You are wrong! It takes you 17 hours to figure out you have to apologize? The ordinary people, Hillary, the people who have to follow the law, who have no choice but to pay their taxes, who have to work 2 and 3 jobs, who fight for all of us - many of whom come back with fewer limbs - don't want a president who hates us. We don't want a president who thinks that we're deplorable. And on this, the eve of worst terror attack on this great nation's soil, by Islamic terrorists! I can't trust a president who doesn't think that I'm worthy of being an American. _____________________________________________________________ PS: I have no idea why my formatting is not displayed in the preview. Maybe if some kind soul has time, they can put in relevant paragraph breaks. Thanks!

Wow! Preach it sister!
“We don’t want a president who hates us!”
And other appropriate sentiments. Wow!

I waded into the feverswamp on this one (went to Dummieunderground). Synthesizing the first 40 comments I read:
There’s the theory that everything is calculated by her campaign and her comment was intended to (choose one or more) a) push the topic of her email server scandal off front page b) a “set up” to show that she can apologize (i.e., the poster implies Trump can’t apologize and that Hillary intentionally faulted and then apologized graciously) or c) pull media limelight off Trump and put it on her.
Personally I think she did it to energize her base; her base likes winning and right now they feel like they are being shamed with her poor performance so she fed them raw meat.
Naturally there are the Dummicrats who put the actual number of deplorables at anywhere from 40 percent on up to 100%

A poster there said they wanted to embrace the meme “deplorables” and dutifully created a hashtag to start the process.

One tender snowflake visited our thread and said they could only “stand a few posts” and that we were “having a field day with it. So calling repubs bigots, racists, phobes etc. seems fair to them but holding Hillary accountable for insulting 25% of voters is “no fairsies” as far as I can tell.

Regarding her apology some feel she issued a “smoothe non-apology”

I’m baffled why the strategy that Dems used - changing different political positions on centralized government etc. to mean that those who don’t agree with them are evil. It provides evidence for my theory that their Narcissistic Personality disorder dominates their perception of the world to THAT extent (i.e., they think they are gods and all who disagree with them are “haters).
But that “people who vote against Dems are inherently evil” meme has worked bizarrely well for them for so long they trotted it out on her campaign - fully expecting to “shame” people into voting for her. So glad I lived to see a day in which the empty Dem rhetoric was at least partially refuted in such a public personalized way.

...raining catfish and dogsharks............

Just like they really believed Obama was a great orator, great uniter, ...fill in the hyperbole. They believe what makes them feel good about themselves. If Hillary is astoundingly brilliant and is a Dem, why then Dems are brilliant and additionally brilliant for recognizing her brilliance when troglydyte republicans can’t even begin to grasp her appeal.
The Dems wanted to feel good about themselves (hello, Narcissism) and if they could only elect a black president, they believed it would “prove” that Repubs are racist and they are morally superior. But voting for an unqualified unvetted unknown would not accomplish this whereas voting for aa savior, being the one to recognize the savior and being “above” all others in voting for him, works for them. Dems decide on what would make them look best in their own eyes and their social circle, then they set about the fantasy of creating the false reality that would support it. Therefore, Hillary ‘has” to be brilliant.

Bmk

http://www.people.com/article/jared-fogle-to-plead-guilty-child-porn-sex-1.4-million-14-victims

“Commercial sex” with two girls (underage) and 12 additional pornography victims (Jared abused them by viewing photos taken of kids when they were changing their clothes etc. at a co-conspirator’s home)

Seems calculated.
My favorite foil chapeau theory: he is beginning to realize that his reputation is trash if he continues to support the deception of the voters. For example, what if he wants to run for pres and people think he’s hiding stuff about himself JUST LIKE he hid obvious stuff about his former master....uh...running mate. He’s also got to worry about how he will be viewed running with someone like Hilary who has not shaken free of her many legal problems. If Hilary and Dill go down in legal flames, it’s not gonna burnish Kaine’s reputation to have been by her side, unable to see her for who she is. Picture his future in politics - THIS is the guy who propped up Hil, was at her side when they put her on a dolly (like Silence of the Lambs) and wheeled her from venue to venue, collecting donations and hiding out from voters............

Dream Child by Trans Siberian Orchestra
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DB7TZCmT0Ao

Lyrics: https://play.google.com/music/preview/Tbty55qlgnbinmzprusce5tvgee?lyrics=1&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=lyrics&pcampaignid=kp-lyrics