Free Republic

Ah, so you are going to speak for conservatives everywhere. Problem is, you’re not a conservative. You’re a lying hypocrite. And you probably couldn’t spot a liberal if one kicked you in the ass. Considering how you love big government, you should probably go find some liberals to hang out with. You have a lot in common with them with your belief that the Constitution is a living, breathing document that means whatever you want it to mean, your intellectual bankruptcy and willingness to lie when backed into a corner by someone who calls you on your bullsh*t.

Just so I’m clear, that last post was me calling you a lying sack of sh*t.

You know, at some point the military is going to have to pick a side.

... along with what the Seattle P-I.com reported was “a six-figure pledge from an anonymous donor,” and that is troubling to gun rights activists...

Looks like Bloomberg finally figured out he's toxic to whatever anti gun rights campaign he openly funds.

Just wait until all those people he recruited to move to Texas from CA, NY, NJ, and New England register to vote. But hey, good on him for inviting them to move there...that’s just that many less migrating to my state.

No, it explains it. It just doesn’t back up the narrative you prefer.

You guess wrong. I used to work in the divorce industry in a previous life until I got into an honest line of work.

Maybe you need to specify what you mean by “against traditional marriage” since you seem to splitting a lot of hairs and assigning false positions to people when challenged on your statements.

If this is true, then why bother voting for candidates who are right on fiscal policies or job creation matters? Why bother with getting someone in Fedgov who is 100 percent dead on on immigration?

Nice straw man, but that has nothing to do with your position that fedgov has power regarding the institution of marriage. You seem to be of the belief that fedov has the power to define, regulate and otherwise sanction marriage even though nothing in the Constitution grants it that power.

Point is... Traditional marriages are our ONLY option. Along with other such similar social issues. Hell, if you ain’t right on favoring traditional marriages, then to hell with you.

Oh, please...you don't care about the institution of marriage beyond the talking point value of it. Fedgov buggers everything it touches. Everything. You care about marriage as much as a parent cares about his kids but knowingly lets a convicted pedophile babysit them. But instead of taking your kids away from the predator, you just want to make sure he gets a new boss that will make him behave.

I’d take the suspension as opposed to being the public defender that got pimp slapped by a guy in a long black dress.

Oh I’m sure he might get a nice early retirement or disability payout after a long payed vacation, err, I mean suspension.

But then we have the old adage of the pot calling the kettle black.

I’m here for the same reason I was 13 years ago...to kill some time.

But for you to take a hostile attitude against conservatives is even more nutz.

Yeah, because libertarians weren't told to get out and not let the door hit us on the ass on the way out. We are a former wing of your party until proven otherwise. Truth is, you guys need us more than we need you. Your demographics are horrible. The mexicans know you don't want them, the blacks will probably never trust you, women for the most part think you hate their kids. But the only group you have any common cause with that will still take your phone calls...you spit at.

The liberals treat us just as badly as you guys do, so we have nothing to lose if we sit back and watch. You see, we're used to being minorities in the political field. But we're not falling for the Lucy and Charlie Brown with the football thing again.

I never said you were conservatives were "wrong." Just that they do a lot of talk about how great that Constitution is. Except for Article 1, Section 8, the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 10th Amendments. And then there is the smaller, less intrusive government advocacy...except for all of the big intrusive fedgov stuff they want that the above mentioned constitution prohibits.

What is most bizarre is that they don't even try to hide it. It's an us vs. them mindset.

This coming from someone with a tag line of "NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing." Yeah, nothing "us vs them" in that. Here is a word for you to look up: Projection.

Calling LBJ a son of a bitch is defending him? Okay...he was a baby eating son of a bitch. I suppose that’s bestowing sainthood on him by your standards.

...be assured the War on Drug is a joke. It benefits almost no one except those who make money on said war.

But it sure makes some sick bastards all giddy when they get to see some thick necked goons dressed like armored ninjas beatin' down some potheads or little kids getting burned in their cribs. Because, you know...there's a law, and all that.

No arrests were made, no charges were filed...

And none will be. The guy in the black dress can do as he pleases.

Until LBJ came along. So. Would you argue that our Constitution and our laws for over 200 years were wrong in the first place? That LBJ proved it doesn’t work?

So LBJ signed the first no-fault divorce bill into law? And I imagine he nationalized child support enforcement, subsidizing the divorce industry when his party took over congress...right? I knew LBJ was a son of a bitch, but I didn't know he did all that.