Free Republic

Thank you for the input. The bad news is, in a reply to youI copied and pasted the original content that included html of a couple of sentences and the same sentences after the post was published to send as examples.

When I previewed it, the original content looked the same as the published content, that is, censored. I've never experienced this before, hell, I am the fringe. I don't do ads and don't trust the monthly tally's when I check them, either.

So I figure we may be a lot further down the road than even I thought if they're screwing with the likes of me.

What I'm going to do is type out the pre-published content and then the published content and hope it turns out ok.

This is the pre-published material:

That 'to hell with everyone else' attitude of the harm reduction leaders is shared by their https://www.scattergoodfoundation.org/about/our-positioning-statement/ supporting foundation Scattergood as stated in the opening sentence of their positioning pronouncement...

At the Scattergood Foundation, we believe major disruption is needed to build a stronger, more effective,compassionate, and inclusive society wher behavioral health is central...

That evidently struck a chord with Philadelphia's own Mr.Big who provided Philadelphia addicts with a get out of a Philadelphia jail free card. (What they were doing isn't legal in the rest of Pennsylvania.)

The message that shows up to the reader at the website goes like this:

That 'to hell with everyone else' attitude of the harm reduction leaders is shared by their Mr.Big who provided Philadelphia addicts with a get out of a Philadelphia jail free card. (What they were doing isn't legal in the rest of Pennsylvania.

And it turned out as expected.

Instead... anything with a hint of being organized or effective is targeted, isolated, jailed on the flimsiest of charges, infiltrated, and pushed off the to fringe to die

I have reason to believe things are a bit further along than that.

That's my website below and I posted the May 8 story early this morning. I use a lot of links to flesh out the post. When I was putting it together the links started to break up before I was done pasting them in place. Go, see if they work for you. I've been posting items for more than ten years and rarely had problems.

https://www.bucksafa11.org/2024/05/08/leading-up-to-may-8-in-philadelphia/

It means they are not trying to harm coal (outside the US)

https://climatesmartventures.com/asia-et-imperative/

Coal is a major driver of global warming that must be addressed, particularly in Asia. In 2022, worldwide coal demand reached a record high amidst a global energy crisis, and the International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted that 2023 will yet again beat the prior year’s record.[3] While coal demand has fallen in the US, EU, and other advanced economies, demand continues to rise in Asia, which accounts for 80% of worldwide coal use.[4] China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines alone account for over 70% of global coal demand, offsetting decreases at the global level.[5] Coal has been the primary fuel for electricity generation in Asia, and electricity demand in the region continues to grow due to rapid industrialization and urbanization, population growth, and rising standards of living. See Figure 1. Eighty-four percent of the global electricity demand increase from 2015 to 2022 is attributed to Asia, according to data from Ember.[6] Moreover, a number of coal plants are still “young” or are being newly built in the region, and could have operational lifespans lasting as late as 2060.

If I ever heard about the International Development Finance Corporation I didn't give it much mind but their active projects page is telling.

After seeing their projects page I did wonder where IDF sprang from and from their search engine and what to my wondering eyes did appear?...

https://www.dfc.gov/search?keywords=Rockefeller !

Not really a surprise; I was already aware of this connection:

https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/profile/rajiv-shah/ from which you will read:

In 2009, he was appointed USAID Administrator by President Obama and unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

Dr. Shah reshaped the $20 billion agency’s operations in more than 70 countries around the world by elevating the role of innovation, creating high-impact public-private partnerships, and focusing U.S. investments to deliver stronger results.

Shah secured bipartisan support that included the passage of two significant laws – the Global Food Security Act and the Electrify Africa Act. He led the U.S. response to the Haiti earthquake and the West African Ebola pandemic, served on the National Security Council, and elevated the role of development as part of our nation’s foreign policy. Prior to his appointment at USAID, Shah served as Chief Scientist and Undersecretary for Research, Education, and Economics at the United States Department of Agriculture where he created the National Institute for Food and Agriculture.

Nothing like prepping your future success with American taxpayer money. I call it the democrat/globalist coalition's under the radar path to enslavement. You might call it Deep State politics.

Even with no covid isolate available...

COVID-19 to Add as Many as 150 Million Extreme Poor by 2021

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/10/07/covid-19-to-add-as-many-as-150-million-extreme-poor-by-2021

...They got ways of convincing people they know stuff.

Your welcome to it and the link to the National Security Study Memorandum 200 is found at https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pcaab500.pdf

I wish Nixon’s EPA would die.

Nixon's? Seriously?

https://www.rbf.org/about/about-us/conservation-and-environment

Concern for the environment has shaped the Rockefeller Brothers Fund's grantmaking throughout its 75-year history, and it offers a good example of how a foundation must not only be clear about its own values and institutional strengths, but must also respond to major intellectual and social changes. The Fund’s approaches have evolved as new aspects of environmental degradation have become evident, as scientific understanding has increased, and as the international environmental movement has gained momentum...

That most Americans connect front man Nixon with the EPA is evidence of the Rockefeller ability to manipulate any project they see fit to use for their advantage without ever being on point.

How about when they share their warm and fuzzies about their intent to https://familybusiness.org/content/investing-for-a-better-world-a-conversation-with ? Those who stop at the headline won't find out...

So in September of 2014 we announced that we had begun the divesting of fossil fuels from the endowment. The whole Rockefeller family wasn’t pulling out of fossil fuels -- just this particular foundation with eight family members on its board.

I do not envy anyone their wealth but when anyone is actively working to turn US into a third world serfdom using phony platforms like global warming and their commitment to the cause is factually based on keeping "the same requirements for returns and risk, but with an added layer of an impact focus for a certain percentage of the endowment. Working with our outsourced chief investment office, Perella Weinberg Partners, our investment committee confirmed that we could do this in a way that does not compromise returns or increase risk. Then there wasn’t much resistance."

That does not resonate well with me and I cannot ignore that kind of characterless leadership; and leading US they've been since the early part of the 20th century, them and their globe trotting friends. They are destroying US.

A broader understanding of how modern crimes against humanity are hatched is needed and why the results of such crimes, having a lasting deleterious effect on our civilization must be recognized and acknowledged.

UNfortunately for the world there is no lack of examples; the one highlighted here started in the Seventies. It is an excellent model of the energy of evil; its incessant drive to power, the hidden, manipulative skill used to hold our freedom in check while at the same time arrest our moral progress with what they call progressivism.

Keep in mind; this is about a modern, particularly devastating crime against the People of the United States. The start of the evil that branched from the coven that spawned it goes back to the early 19th century and shares responsibility for much of the world wide devastation we are being guilted into accepting the bill for that ends up in their coffers and finances the whores who are the faces of the changes designed by higher echelon evil who you shall soon recognize as the one’s calling the shots in your life.

https://www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm

March 27, 1972

To the President and Congress of the United States:

I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.

After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.

The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.

To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.

Respectfully submitted for the Commission,

John D. Rockefeller 3rd Chairman

President Nixon’s response

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-about-the-report-the-commission-population-growth-and-the-american-future

Statement About the Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future

May 05, 1972

THE Commission on Population Growth and the American Future has formally presented its report to me today, thus completing its 2 years of work.

The men and women on this panel have performed a valuable public service in identifying and examining a wide range of problems related to population, and have contributed to an emerging debate of great significance to the future of our Nation.

I wish to thank the able and energetic Chairman of the Commission, Mr. John D. Rockefeller 3d, for his tireless efforts, not only on this Commission but in other capacities, to focus the Nation’s attention on these important issues.

The extensive public discussion already generated by this report clearly indicates the need to continue research in areas touching on population growth and distribution.

While I do not plan to comment extensively on the contents and recommendations of the report, I do feel that it is important that the public know my views on some of the issues raised.

In particular, I want to reaffirm and reemphasize that I do not support unrestricted abortion policies. As I stated on April 3, 1971, when I revised abortion policies in military hospitals, I consider abortion an unacceptable form of population control. In my judgment, unrestricted abortion policies would demean human life. I also want to make it clear that I do not support the unrestricted distribution of family planning services and devices to minors. Such measures would do nothing to preserve and strengthen close family relationships.

I have a basic faith that the American people themselves will make sound judgments regarding family size and frequency of births, judgments that are conducive both to the public interest and to personal family goals–and I believe in the right of married couples to make these judgments for themselves.

While disagreeing with the general thrust of some of the Commission’s recommendations, I wish to extend my thanks to the members of the Commission for their work and for having assembled much valuable information.

The findings and conclusions of the Commission should be of great value in assisting governments at all levels to formulate policy. At the Federal level, through our recent reorganization of the Executive Office of the President, we have the means through the Domestic Council and the Office of Management and Budget to follow up on the Commission’s report. The recommendations of the Commission will be taken into account as we formulate our national growth and population research policies, and our agency budgets through these processes for the years ahead.

Many of the questions raised by the report cannot be answered purely on the basis of fact, but rather involve moral judgments about which reasonable men will disagree. I hope that the discussions ahead will be informed ones, so that we all will be better able to face these questions relating to population in full knowledge of the consequences of our decisions.

Twenty seven months after Nixon’s response he was encouraged out of office and succeeded by Gerald Ford. One hundred twenty three days later the National Security Study Memorandum 200 otherwise recognized as the Kissinger Report was released, though not for public consumption; it was classified and shared only with those who had a need to know.

Seven days later Nelson Rockefeller assumed the role of Vice President.

If you are going to read that USAID pdf, and you should if you want to get an idea of what awaits was laid out between the lines, I suggest you start on the last page and work back.

Forty years later the Rockefellers were still celebrating.

From https://www.passblue.com/2012/04/12/a-rockefeller-got-it-right-on-us-population-growth/?

...The report’s summary was unequivocal. John D. Rockefeller III, the commission’s chairman, wrote in a submission letter on March 27, 1972, that “after two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the nation’s ability to solve its problems.”

But shortly after receiving the report, Nixon rejected it. Nixon, concerned about his re-election, according to Rockefeller, bowed to political pressures, in particular vocal religious and conservative groups, and disavowed the report’s key recommendations.

Rockefeller’s letter also noted that the commission had looked for but did not find any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. It called for an early end to further population increases, appealing to Americans to abandon their “ideological addiction to growth” and the outdated pro-natalist biases rooted in their social institutions. Even businesspeople on the commission supported the central, near heretical finding: “The health of our country does not depend on population growth, nor does the vitality of business, nor the welfare of the average person.”

The commission also said that population growth is a major factor affecting domestic demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment. Slower population growth would reduce pressures on the environment and the depletion of resources as well as gain time to find solutions to the nation’s problems.

The commission confronted other explosive issues. It recommended decriminalizing abortion, removing legal barriers to obtaining contraceptives, providing sex education in schools, freezing legal immigration to no more than 400,000 a year, stopping illegal immigration, approving the Equal Rights Amendment and ensuring freedom from discrimination based on sex.

The group dismissed charges that it would have the government tell citizens how many children they could have. Its aim was freedom of choice, under which “it would be equally honorable to marry or not, to be childless or not, to have one child or two, or more. Our goal is less regimentation of reproductive behavior, not more.” Although the report and its recommendations were rejected, some of the suggestions came to fruition later. In 1973, Roe v. Wade decriminalized abortion. Most states dismantled laws restricting contraceptives and expanded sex education in schools. And much progress has been made on banning sex discrimination.

Notable demographic changes, of course, have occurred in the country since the 1972 report. America’s population has expanded by more than 100 million, to 313 million. Average fertility has declined close to the replacement level of about two children for each family, and teenage pregnancy is at its lowest level in 40 years. Legal immigration has increased nearly threefold, to about 1.1 million a year, and the number of people living illegally in the US is more than 11 million.

Yet the US still has no population policy. Given the November presidential election and the political climate in Washington, it seems doubtful that Congress will address population issues, especially immigration reform, soon.

When the government does begin to debate population policy again, it will be useful to consider demographic realities, future population projections and likely environmental costs. Even with replacement fertility, the US population is projected to exceed 400 million by midcentury. Most of the growth is a result of immigration by migrants and their descendants.

Embracing the traditional pro-growth ethic that “more is better” is as unacceptable now as it was decades ago.

Congress, the president and the public should give serious consideration to the Rockefeller Commission’s recommendation that no major benefits will result from more population growth and that gradual stabilizing of the US population through voluntary means would help significantly to solving American problems.

PASSBLUE IS A PARTNER WITH THE NEW SCHOOL – JULIEN J. STUDLEY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS © 2022 – PassBlue

https://www.wikitree.com/genealogy/ROCKEFELLER

https://www.ontheissues.org/social/John_Rockefeller_Abortion.htm

So the National Security Bill does nothing for our national security.

We have to remember not to take it personal, it's only business, albeit Joe's business

https://aldianews.com/en/politics/policy/temporary-protected-status

But the UN asks...

How would a day without migrants look like?

https://www.un.org/en/fight-racism/vulnerable-groups/migrants

'Deep State' term doesn't bring any substance to most people's understanding of who is screwing US and how. This is a peek into the supply/support side of those participating in the organized shadows and how they signal virtuous from those shadows.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/funding-the-development-and-manufacturing-of-covid-19-vaccines-the-need-for-global-collective-action/

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a person can interpret that as this 'beacon of liberty' has been transformed into Molech's bagman.

Some might think of that situation as a basic misunderstanding of what many others call living the dream.

Thanks for the direction.

But it is absolutely there for anyone who has time to dig for corporate connections several levels deep...

“But your suspicion is unfounded.”

Nope... Trust me, those connections are absolutely there.

That five levels deep concept sounded interesting. I tried it at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

They link to https://www.rbf.org/grantees/fund-constitutional-government where I clicked on peacebuilding

Then I clicked on Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees that delivered me to gcir.org and Who Gets To Be American

I had to be at least five deep by then. and, to me, it sounded more like what a version of America would sound like in a philanthropically dark HOA than a fund for Constitutional Governance.

Unless they have plans they're not sharing with US.

One more click on http://www.fcgonline.org and you can read:

FCG is a hub for dynamic projects promoting democracy, government and corporate transparency, fair economies, and the fights against corruption and climate change.

I'm pretty sure that thinking fits in well with the globalist minded uniparty sychophants procedural outline they appear to be adhering to instead of the U.S. Constitution.

This is an excerpt from a May 2022 post I did (not FR) addressing that question:

...I questioned neuroscience’s intrusive applications of their alleged science when they came up with that covid scam; now they’re developing non-invasive stimulation and talking hallucinogen’s as sedatives at the same time? Just what are their motives behind those applications. Many people don’t know how they took the right to such power from the electorate. Some bureaucrats don’t yet know how to use it efficiently. If they aren’t quick learners they’ll be replaced soon enough.

Watch this video for a few minutes; do you think they’ll be around long?

https://www.ssrc.org/programs/the-mercury-project/

I don’t think those puppets know what to do next except announce another ten million dollars was donated to fight mis/dis information.

They appear to be the scientist version of Biden.

Where did these people come from?

https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2022/nsf22080/nsf22080.jsp?org=NSF

SSRC is a private foundation based in Brooklyn, NY, that collaborates with the Rockefeller Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies and other private foundations to fund research focused on advancing scientific knowledge about public health guidance. It “fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines, and mobilizes necessary knowledge on important public issues.”

As far as I’m concerned, the role played by the Rockefellers while reshaping our future has not been widely recognized by the American public; and except for the handful of NGO initiates well versed in the art of double edged benevolence, fewer still understand the role chosen by them.

I don’t remember any request to fight mis/dis information; prior to the explosion of public access to government business via the internet most people believed the gummint.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Lederberg

In 1978, he became the president of Rockefeller University, until he stepped down in 1990…

During a 1986 fact finding mission of the 1979 Soviet Union epidemic of anthrax bacteria… Lederberg sided with Soviets that the anthrax outbreak was from animal to human transmission stating, “Wild rumors do spread around every epidemic.” After the fall of the Soviet Union… subsequent US investigations in the early 1990’s a team of scientists confirmed the outbreak was caused by a release of an aerosol of anthrax pathogen from a nearby military facility.

Well, that is Wikipedia. Anything gets published there. Whoa…wait a minute… what’s this? Bsides me having a little fun?

https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101584906X18717-doc

Dang. For your reading convenience, here’s the story told in big letters

https://web.archive.org/web/20220712184750/https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/ext/document/101584906X18717/PDF/101584906X18717.pdf

I like to have three sources when the story stretches reality so far.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plague/sverdlovsk/

but this one is so singularly a stretch, yet has what appears to be a legitimacy ranking of the first order, I’ll serve it up unencumbered without any support other than what’s in the story itself.

https://parasitesinsideme.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CIA-classified-documents-in-Rockefellers-barn.pdf

Anybody know how Biden's 2021 infrastructure program is working out? It was supposed to upgrade roads, bridges, railroads and so much more but the best part was it wouldn't raise taxes!

The pitiful UNstated concern for our National character is it's Spring, the class is in their mid-teens and instead of a classroom erupting in chants of illegal alien in the hope of getting three days off a BS woke argument ensues.

Sux to be young is being embraced by the young. Dam shame.

I'm more concerned with NATO's humanistic based attitudes and expressed beliefs than I am with Russian attitudes and expressed beliefs.

NATO = WHO, WTO and UN domination agenda

Russia = WHO, WTO and UN domination alternative with a more reality based normal and acceptable belief systems.

Judging by the number of could's, if's and other indeterminate scientific vagaries used, he was just using science rhetoric to baffle his audience.

It works wonders on applying for government grants. Look at Fauci's success.

No global warming? No covid? No problem when you get good at baffling everybody.

Climate change hoaxers...

Don't care how long it takes.

https://www.geoengineeringmonitor.org/2018/04/marine-cloud-brightening-project-geoengineering-experiment-briefing/

Something like his son...

https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/senate-bill/226

Looks to me like the politicization of religions is where the 'progressives' are pre-positioning themselves for the next attack on Middle America and the First Amendment.

They appear to be misinterpreting the first ten words of the amendment and planning to ignore the next six.

Don't have to read more than the first three pages of this https://lawrightsreligion.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Images/Section%20II%20Whose%20Faith%20Matters%2012.12.19.pdf

to recognize that.