10/25/2016 7:45:49 AM PDT
· 61 of 62 kimtom
to Bull Snipe
The WWII soviet assignments was partly due to shortages.
They took, as you know huge losses in 1st two years.
I read that by 44’, they were beginning to feeling the strain. But they were winning by mid 44, and soviet troop quality (leaders, mostly) had improved dramatically.
The soviet trooper, was a hardy fighter, poorly led (early).
In WWII Russian women fought alongside men, but they were generally segregated. (the Reds knew the difference, huh?) It wasn't all by choice, either. Standards (what ever branch) should not be lowered. I am sure a lot of women can perform many duties. I am old now, but even "fit" I had trouble maintaining my composure lugging (running) 30-50 pounds of ammo and weapons very far.
10/24/2016 6:37:51 AM PDT
· 44 of 48 kimtom
to ThunderSleeps
“...It might cause suspicion. Might ignite a few investigations...raise too many inconvenient questions. Therefore they need everyone to hear how Clinton is ahead, to forestall those suspicions. ...”
You are dead on, Great Point!!!
I think all the posturing is to make a fake election seem creditable. In the past Republican wins are “allowed” if the goals are the same......which it appears it was!! (Bush)
Trump does better than Clinton among men (48% to 34%), lower-income voters (48% to 35%), rural voters (60% to 22%), and those who express a religion.
Clinton beats Trump with women (46% to 38%), voters ages 18-44 (41% to 34%), the wealthy (47% to 38%), and investors (48% to 38%). (who has the banker-wall street support??)
interesting break down;
who makes up the women..... the brainless, single, feminazi??