Free Republic 1st Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $43,530
49%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 49% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by kabar

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 5:31:21 AM PST · 33 of 34
    kabar to Moorings

    In 2008 Obama won by 10 million votes and received the highest vote total in US history. Bring on the Kool-aid.

  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 5:26:51 AM PST · 32 of 34
    kabar to jwalsh07

    It wasn’t a two man race in Iowa. Cruz got 28% to 24% for Trump and received one more delegate than Trump and Rubio. In NH trump got three times more votes than Cruz who finished third barely ahead of Bush. Trump won every demographic.

    If it devolves into a two man race, it will be Trump and someone other than Cruz.

  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 5:11:52 AM PST · 27 of 34
    kabar to Cincinatus' Wife

    Little boys playing with dolls and doll houses? Someone who never served in the military shooting guns to cook bacon?

    What’s next? Cruz riding around in a tank wearing a helmet?

  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 5:04:15 AM PST · 25 of 34
    kabar to Cincinatus' Wife

    And the point is?

  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 5:00:49 AM PST · 23 of 34
    kabar to SmokingJoe

    What happened in NH? The “big buffoon” demolished the field. SC, like NH, is not a caucus state. We just go to the polls and vote. I am waiting for the excuses after SC. Cruz reached his high water mark in Iowa.

    I see Rubio or Bush beating Cruz for second place in SC. Rubio has been flooding the airways with ads featuring Tim Scott and Trey Gowdy endorsing him. Jeb has Dubya and Graham stumping for him. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Gov Haley endorse Rubio or Bush. SC is going to be bloody.

  • Trump, Cruz Pound Each Other in South Carolina Attack Ads

    02/11/2016 4:41:45 AM PST · 19 of 34
    kabar to Cincinatus' Wife

    Cruz is going to lose here in SC—by a lot. He is making a major mistake going after Trump. He is hurting himself and helping Rubio and Bush. The GOPe wants to take out the “outsiders”. Trump has a much higher ceiling than Cruz. Eventually, it will come down to Trump versus the GOPe candidate. Cruz could prove critical at a brokered convention.

    Getting into a cage death match with Trump will only lessen Cruz’s influence and strength. Trump is stronger than Cruz in the South.

  • Trump Thumps Merkel On Migrant Madness: ‘It’s The End Of Europe’

    02/11/2016 3:58:55 AM PST · 19 of 41
    kabar to Mr Apple

    They won’t stay in Canada. They will come to the US to join the millions of Muslims already here. They will have no problem entering once they get Canadian papers.

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 11:09:37 PM PST · 37 of 162
    kabar to John Valentine

    He’ll hire the right people to do that.

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 11:06:17 PM PST · 33 of 162
    kabar to GodGunsGuts

    About nothing except making Larry David and Seinfeld hundreds of millions of dollars.

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 11:04:22 PM PST · 31 of 162
    kabar to TontoKowalski

    Ted is going to get beat like a rented mule here in SC.

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 11:02:53 PM PST · 28 of 162
    kabar to GodGunsGuts
    Exit poll data revealed that Trump pretty much dominated his rivals across many demographics and sub-groups, beating them across all age groups. Here are some of Trump’s notable wins in New Hampshire:

    At least 29% of the vote in each of the 10 counties

    37% of male voters

    32% of female voters

    46% of people who have a high-school degree or less

    41% of white voters without a college degree

    39% of voters making less than $50,000 a year

    35% of Republicans who voted in the GOP primary

    35% of independents who voted in the GOP primary

    36% of conservative primary voters

    32% of moderate primary voters

    31% of voters who said the most important issue is the economy

    52% of voters who said the most important issue is illegal immigration

    32% of voters who said electability was the top quality for a candidate to have

    65% of voters who said a candidate telling it “like it is” is their top quality

    44% of the Republican primary voters who said there should be a ban o Muslims coming to the U.S. (In all, 64% of Republican voters believe that.)

    So, if you’re a Republican fighting Trump in this election, you’d better think of ways of putting up a better fight with the help of all this data. Exit polls also showed that seven in 10 Trump supporters said their vote was a “strong endorsement,” while less than 30% had reservations.

    The GOP frontrunner earned 46% of the vote among those with a high school education or less; second place was Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)with 13%. Trump earned the support of 38% of those with some college; second place was John Kasich with 14%. Trump earned the support of 32% of college graduates; second place was John Kasich with 18%. Trump won 23% of those with post-graduate study; Kasich came in second with 22%.

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 10:56:11 PM PST · 16 of 162
    kabar to GodGunsGuts
    Ted Cruz’s 10 Biggest Flip Flops

    So what has Cruz accomplished in the Senate? How many of his fellow GOP senators have endorsed him?

  • Cruz campaign aide: Trump running 'the Seinfeld candidacy'

    02/10/2016 10:51:33 PM PST · 7 of 162
    kabar to GodGunsGuts

    Seinfeld was a very successful show.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 10:21:42 PM PST · 68 of 71
    kabar to andy1954

    What is over the top? Be specific.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 10:20:54 PM PST · 67 of 71
    kabar to Robert DeLong
    Perhaps I misunderstood what you were trying to tell me, and instead interpreted as you refuting my claim that Ted Cruz is a naturalized citizen.

    I am refuting your claim that Cruz is a naturalized citizen. The 7 FAM reference I provided clearly states that he is not a naturalized citizen.

    At any rate it is quite obvious why Laurence Tribe would claim McCain is a natural born citizen. Anything else meant he would have to admit that Obama was not a NBC as well.

    It was a joint opinion by Tribe and Olson. Again, none of this is settled law. In the 7 FAM reference I provided to you, 7 FAM 1131.6-2 Eligibility for Presidency clearly states:

    a. It has never been determined definitively by a court whether a person who acquired U.S. citizenship by birth abroad to U.S. citizens is a natural-born citizen within the meaning of Article II of the Constitution and, therefore, eligible for the Presidency.

    b. Section 1, Article II, of the Constitution states, in relevant part that “No Person except a natural born Citizen...shall be eligible for the Office of President.”

    c. The Constitution does not define "natural born". The “Act to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization”, enacted March 26, 1790, (1 Stat. 103,104) provided that, “...the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born ... out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.”

    d. This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.

    It may not be settled, however, any ruling other than ruling a natural born citizen is anything other than a child born within the territorial borders of America to citizen parents is an act of subversion rising to the level of treason. Unless people on this board start realizing this fact they are aiding in the destruction of this country.

    It needs to be litigated. You are entitled to your opinion of what is or is not "treason," but we need a ruling from SCOTUS to clear this up once and for all. Cruz has standing and should seek a court ruling otherwise we will have another case of a person with questionable eligibility for the Presidency. The failure to properly vet Obama has set an unfortunate precedent. Many of the same people who questioned Obama's eligibility are turning a blind eye in the case of Cruz or for that matter, Rubio and Jindal who were born on US soil but not to US citizen parents.

    I want a ruling period. I will accept whatever is decided. We can in the meantime, get rid of birthright citizenship, which would certainly solve any future problem with the children of illegal aliens.

  • Cruz to GOP: It’s either me or Trump

    02/10/2016 7:20:20 PM PST · 101 of 350
    kabar to sagar
    Who defines what conservatism is? We have a GOP-controlled Congress populated by politicians who call themselves conservatives. They haven't stopped Obama's agenda. In fact they give him everything he wants.

    The GOP "conservatives" play us for suckers. They toss around words like the Constitution and the Rule of Law and fiscal responsibility while doing the bidding of their corporate paymasters and special interests.

    Cruz wanted to increase H-1B visas 500%. He has flip-flopped on immigration and other issues. His donors include Goldman-Sachs and the Club for Growth along with a billionaire hedge fund sugar daddy. Not one senator has endorsed Cruz. Is he the only conservative in the Senate?

    Conservatism is dying as the demographics of this country change rapidly. Mass immigration is killing conservatism.

  • Cruz to GOP: It’s either me or Trump

    02/10/2016 7:08:29 PM PST · 85 of 350
    kabar to EagleUSA
    I think it will get down to Trump versus Cruz.

    I don't think so. There will be a GOPe candidate who emerges after Super Tuesday. Cruz and Trump don't attract more than 50% of the vote together. Rubio or Bush will be the GOPe candidate. One of them will get out before the March 15 winner take all in FL.

  • Cruz to GOP: It’s either me or Trump

    02/10/2016 7:05:08 PM PST · 80 of 350
    kabar to BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

    Trump

  • Hidden Report: Mexico Remittances Total More Than Entire Mexican Oil Revenue

    02/10/2016 7:02:53 PM PST · 22 of 34
    kabar to Helicondelta
    Globally, over $125 billion a year goes from the US to the rest of the world. When less than one in 8 in this country is foreign-born, the highest in 105 years, lots of money exits this country rather than being spent on the local economy. One of the "benefits" of mass immigration.

  • Carson staying in race, sees South Carolina victory

    02/10/2016 6:55:56 PM PST · 50 of 65
    kabar to conservative98

    He will also take votes from Cruz with the Evangelicals.

  • Carson staying in race, sees South Carolina victory

    02/10/2016 6:04:13 PM PST · 33 of 65
    kabar to conservative98

    Carson came in 4th in Iowa and received three delegates. He beat, among others, Bush and Kasich who are still in the race.

  • Carson staying in race, sees South Carolina victory

    02/10/2016 6:00:26 PM PST · 32 of 65
    kabar to conservative98

    Stay in the race Ben. The more outsiders the better. Get some delegates so that if there is a brokered convention, we can win.

  • Donald Trump: We’re Going To Keep Common Core

    02/10/2016 5:51:33 PM PST · 75 of 81
    kabar to TBBT

    Misstatement. Trump has repeatedly said he will eliminate common core. He says it at every campaign event. So he misspoke.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 5:31:44 PM PST · 62 of 71
    kabar to Robert DeLong
    I never indicated he was not a citizen, he absolutely is. My contention is that he is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution.

    And I stated that the matter has never been litigated and should be. It is not settled law despite Cruz's contention to the contrary.

    The reason I asked about circumstances was because you said your child was a natural born citizen and not a naturalized citizen, while stating your child was born overseas. There is of course a difference between the naturalized citizens at birth, and natural born citizens.

    You must have me confused with someone else. I never said my child was unequivocally a nature born citizen as it applies to being eligible to be President under the Constitution. I believe she is under my circumstances being an accredited diplomat stationed overseas born to two Amcit parents. But the matter has never been litigated in the courts. It should be.

    Just as "anchor" babies are citizens at birth, they are not natural born citizens. Some here seem to think they also qualify as citizens who when they obtain the age of 35 are eligible to become the President.

    It is not settled law. It needs to be litigated. We have 300,000 anchor babies born annually. If you look at the Laurence Tribe/Ted Olson opinion that was commissioned by the Senate in 2008 to determine if McCain was eligible, you will see that they believe birthright citizenship, i.e., jus solis, is NBC. McCain - Opinion of Laurence H. Tribe and Theodore B. Olson

    Tribe/Olson also gratuitously offered the opinion that Obama was a NBC because he was born in Hawaii. FWIW: Obama's mother could not have transmitted citizenship to Obama due to the regulations at the time re her age and other factors if Obama had indeed been born overseas.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 4:38:45 PM PST · 61 of 71
    kabar to andy1954
    A little over the top? This country is in serious decline. Beyond the massive national debt, ballooning welfare rolls, lowest labor participation rates in 38 years, porous borders, and eviscerated military, this country's rapidly changing demographics fueled by mass immigration and minority birthrates will ensure that the Dems are the permanent majority party and the death of conservationism.

    Phyllis Schlafly documented all of it in her study, How Mass (Legal) Immigration Dooms a Conservative Republican Party

    When historians write about the decline and fall of the United States, they will point to the 1965 Immigration Act that caused it.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 2:51:19 PM PST · 58 of 71
    kabar to Robert DeLong

    I was not referring to my circumstances, just my professional and personal experience with the issue.

    Ted is a US citizen, by birth, not naturalization. The issue is whether he is a NBC or not. It needs to be resolved by the courts.

  • Don’t sleep on Ted Cruz. The next five weeks look very, very good for him.

    02/10/2016 12:37:01 PM PST · 81 of 105
    kabar to xzins
    Trump recognized from the very beginning that he needed to take Bush out. He has the money and the connections.

    In 9 out of the last ten elections we have had a Bush or a Clinton running for President or Vice President. And in 28 out of the past 35 years, there has been a Clinton or Bush as President or VP. Add to that Clinton's four years as SecState and you have these two families at center stage for 32 our the past 35 years. Dynastic politics at its worst. We have become a banana republic.

  • Don’t sleep on Ted Cruz. The next five weeks look very, very good for him.

    02/10/2016 12:26:55 PM PST · 78 of 105
    kabar to xzins

    I just moved to SC a year ago. Yes, I wonder how he gets reelected. There is a GOPe here and he is part of it. I am more surprised that Tim Scott and Trey Gowdy endorsed Rubio. Their ads are flooding the airways here. I expect Jeb to use Lindsay to do the same thing. Hopefully, Rubio and Jeb will cancel one another out.

  • Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina and Chris Christie Need to Go Home

    02/10/2016 11:44:42 AM PST · 27 of 35
    kabar to conservativejoy

    Erickson wants them to go home. He is anti-Trump and is trying to figure out a way to stop him. He must think the votes will go to Cruz or Rubio.

  • Don’t sleep on Ted Cruz. The next five weeks look very, very good for him.

    02/10/2016 11:40:37 AM PST · 68 of 105
    kabar to xzins

    Trump will win SC.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 10:47:31 AM PST · 53 of 71
    kabar to Robert DeLong
    Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by a Child Born Abroad

    Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock

    A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be the genetic or the gestational parent and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.

    I am a retired FSO who held a consular commission. I also had a child born abroad while being posted at an Embassy. The applicable FAM reference is 7 FAM 1131.6-3 Not Citizens by “Naturalization”

    Section 101(a)(23) INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(23)) provides that the term "naturalization" means "the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever." Persons who acquire U.S. citizenship at birth by birth abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents who meet the applicable statutory transmission requirements are not considered citizens by naturalization.

    They are citizens by statue thru derivative citizenship.

  • How New Hampshire turned into a nightmare for the Republican establishment

    02/10/2016 9:56:54 AM PST · 32 of 58
    kabar to Responsibility2nd

    Trump took great satisfaction from his NH massive victory. It gives him Trmpmentum going into SC where he has a big lead.

  • Senator Mike Lee Pushes to Definitively Bar Women from the Draft

    02/10/2016 9:47:58 AM PST · 14 of 30
    kabar to GIdget2004
    Female Gunnery Sergeant has HARDCORE response to Rubio/Christie/Bush on women in combat

    The three Republican candidates apparently bought into the left’s argument that this is an equal opportunity issue. No, this is a combat readiness issue. Period. Women in combat isn’t a feel good argument about “if she wants to do it” or “it’s her choice.” We’re talking about the difference between living or dying, and living means crushing an enemy whose only way to survive is by killing his opponent.

    None of the candidates stated they researched the issue, or that they spoke to any of the military leaders who have requested exemption for infantry and commando units. So to me, many jumped on board the narrative to appeal to female voters. Before any candidate supports the draft, he or she needs to take a closer look to understand what it really means. It doesn’t mean women will be assigned to desk jobs to “Free a man to fight” like during WWII. It means women can and will be involuntarily assigned to combat and infantry units.

    Be straight to the voters. Women in combat will cause women to die at a much higher rate then men in the next conflict.

    The primary mission of the military is to eliminate the enemy by the quickest and most powerful means possible. When the military experiences any change, it should be to make units more lethal. There is zero evidence women in the infantry, special forces, or combat arms can do this.

    The Marine Corps conducted a year-long study on women in integrated infantry units. The results clearly demonstrated women were not as effective as men in combat operations. However, critics shouted that the study was flawed and claimed the strongest and best women weren’t chosen for the study. The women in the study were stunned and insulted when Secretary Mabus “suggested the Marines’ study was flawed due to the caliber and mindset of the volunteer participants.” Several female Marines spoke out that Mabus dismissed their capabilities. Simply put, the Marines felt the Secretary of the Navy threw them under the bus. The Secretary’s argument wasn’t only insulting, it was highly flawed. Just to be a female Marine means you are already above average in fitness compared to most women. Apparently, even to the Secretary, that wasn’t good enough for the study.

    The critics of the Marine Corps study actually proved my point: you must be a super woman to do this, and anyone less shouldn’t have been selected for the study. Isn’t that a contradiction to what is already a high standard women meet even to be a Marine?

    The military isn’t being honest with women. All data shows that women are injured at twice the rate of men. Yes – TWICE the rate. In Army basic combat training women were injured 114 percent higher rate than men. These statistics are just in present combat support roles, not the combat/infantry units. Is the military disclosing this injury rate to women? Of course not, because it doesn’t fit the narrative. Even as engineers and military police, women have 108 percent higher injury ratings.

    Sustained combat operations are physical. Even if a female can meet the standards men currently have in place, she will always be in the bottom percentile physically. Women have less muscle mass and less lung capacity – this is common knowledge. So even the most physically fit women are not going to be competitive with physically fit men. And after serving 20 years in the Marines, I can assure you, Marines are physically fit. One of the greatest areas emphasized by the Corps is physical fitness for the simple reason: to sustain long term combat operations, a Marine must be in top physical shape. Bodies break that can’t maintain the immense stress and physical requirements carrying gear and weapons for long periods of time.

    Few women serve in the infantry in any other nation and the reality is, those countries are experiencing difficulties making it work. Israel doesn’t have women on the front lines. There are women in Kurdistan fighting – but much of their training and front line engagement is not revealed. Females in Israel only serve 2 years and don’t serve in units on their front lines. The reality is that both Israel and Kurdistan require all hands on deck, so to speak. It’s imperative for their survival. However, the U.S. is the tip of the spear fighting terrorism and evil dictators that have no hesitation to destroy America or her allies. We can’t modify standards just to give everyone a chance to face ISIS in hand-to-hand combat. It’s imperative we maintain standards and be the most lethal force on the planet.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 9:24:57 AM PST · 48 of 71
    kabar to Robert DeLong
    Ted was born abroad but to only 1 citizen parent. However, even if both had been citizen parents, he would still be considered a naturalized citizen

    You were correct on most of what you stated, but Cruz is not a naturalized citizen. US Code provides for two methods of citizenship, by birth and naturalization. Cruz obtained derivative citizenship (jus sanguinis) thru his mother. This is considered by birth, since Cruz did not go thru the naturalization process, which is distinctly different than derivative citizenship both in process and substance.

    However, the issue of NBC is an open question and needs to be resolved thru the courts. It is not settled law.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 9:18:19 AM PST · 47 of 71
    kabar to taxcontrol
    Cruz has derivative citizenship thru his mother. It is not automatic like jus solis. Someone has to take an overt action to claim such citizenship.

    Cruz was a citizen at birth (jus soils) of Canada. He was a dual national until 20 months ago when he renounced his Canadian citizenship.

    There is no doubt that Cruz is a US citizen. The question is whether he is a natural born citizen as it pertains to eligibility to be President under the Constitution. It is not settled law. It needs to be litigated.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 9:06:57 AM PST · 44 of 71
    kabar to andy1954

    Rubio has to get the nomination first. Bush and Rubio are unabashed amnesty supporters. If the GOP nominates either one of them, the party is finished along with the country.

  • New Hampshire Consequences and The GOPe Road Map Moving Forward

    02/10/2016 6:59:14 AM PST · 20 of 71
    kabar to andy1954

    If Rubio is the candidate, we will lose. His Gang of 8 membership should disqualify him period.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 10:07:01 PM PST · 2,592 of 2,717
    kabar to DrewsMum

    Put some ice on it.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 9:57:32 PM PST · 2,585 of 2,717
    kabar to Cboldt

    If you take a look at the exit polls, Trump performed across all demographics better than anyone else. A very impressive victory in NH and a strong second in Iowa give him big momentum going into SC where he already has a significant lead in the polls.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 8:57:23 PM PST · 2,520 of 2,717
    kabar to BillyBoy

    But Trump didn’t lose. Cruz lost by 50,000 votes. And Cruz will lose in SC.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 7:04:33 PM PST · 2,166 of 2,717
    kabar to stars & stripes forever

    14 votes between Cruz and Bush.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 6:22:10 PM PST · 1,785 of 2,717
    kabar to patq

    She has to campaign on Obama’s vision to stay out of jail.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 6:20:15 PM PST · 1,756 of 2,717
    kabar to Oldeconomybuyer

    Hillary having a Howard Dean moment. Hilarious.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 6:16:54 PM PST · 1,712 of 2,717
    kabar to libbylu

    I am sure Trump will get your vote anyway.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 6:06:02 PM PST · 1,594 of 2,717
    kabar to QuigleyDU

    Trump will take SC comfortably. He has been here a lot and drew big, enthusiastic crowds. I attended his rally in Hilton Head. The Big Trump Machine is on a roll.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 5:16:37 PM PST · 1,130 of 2,717
    kabar to Parley Baer

    We all know that Bush is going to be declared the big winner. He will be called the comeback kid. I hope the GOPe can pour more money into his campaign so he can piss it away.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 5:12:41 PM PST · 1,093 of 2,717
    kabar to Captain Peter Blood

    No way Kasich registers in SC. Trump will roll thru SC.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 4:20:44 PM PST · 660 of 2,717
    kabar to Parley Baer

    RCP final poll average had Trump at 31.2%.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 3:54:50 PM PST · 539 of 2,717
    kabar to RightGeek

    That leaves only 28% for the rest.

  • LIVE THREAD: NH Vote Results

    02/09/2016 3:52:22 PM PST · 531 of 2,717
    kabar to NKP_Vet

    Hope springs eternal in the human breast;
    Man never is, but always to be blessed:
    The soul, uneasy and confined from home,
    Rests and expatiates in a life to come.

    Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man