Free Republic

>
Single subject bills or bust:a plethora of unitentional consequences are brewing in this big ugly bill.
>

Yes, but how will THAT help the Uniparty push more (illegal) BIG govt? /s

>
Tax write offs for oil bad
Tax write offs for wind and solar good
>

Taxpayer $ to wind/solar 2x+ ‘good’

More willful conflation of tax write-offs (reduction in $ paid) vs. tax CREDITS (other People’s $ given)

>
Notice the wording: “cutting back access to healthcare”.

No one is cutting their “access” to healthcare, they just have to pay for it like everyone else.
>

Come now, THAT ship has *long* sailed.

You forgot to bring up how it’s “THEIR {X}”, when the TAXPAYERS are on the hook for everything.

Commie Leftists (I repeat myself) == ‘Liberal’ (having ZERO to do w/ Liberty), let alone ‘progressive’

No corrections, even on the right, when ‘criminal illegal aliens’ are instead called ‘immigrants’

Hell, we’re back to ‘{X} keeping more of their OWN property (aka “tax cuts”)’ as having to be ‘financed/paid for’ *facepalm*. For SURE *nobody* on the right says otherwise; that’d begin a discussion NOBODY in govt wants to start.

>
If they mean student per-capita cost, then maybe yes. But overall net cost should go down - fewer teachers, fewer classrooms open, less material support, reduced energy usage, etc.
>

EVEN *IF* the school were to capacity, the costs ALWAYS increase. The level of admins has GREATLY surpassed the ‘per student’ or even ‘students per teacher’

The “problem”, as always: GOVT

https://www.americanexperiment.org/district-admin-growth-10x-greater-than-student-teacher-growth/

Govt aid/abet/harbor-ing+ criminal illegal aliens does not make them “immigrants”, let alone non-criminal. It makes the state an ACCESSORY (IE: itself a CRIME)

Course, that she & others, that are part/parcel of ‘govt’, haven’t (yet? *rolls eyes*) been arrested, disbarred a/o prosecuted further prove this whole thing is a farce/dog-n-pony show.

>all income taxes need to be totally and permanently eliminated.

Well, as
1) Govt can borrow all it ‘needs’
2) The 16th violates 4th, 5th, 13th & 14th on its face == illegal/un-Constitutional

they should be eliminated...Y’DAY (but, what do *I* know, I can only read simple English)

Course, it’s all “legal” plunder via the 3-crooked-legs of the GOVT stool.

Black-robed crooks: Govt CAN tax
Retort: Never in question. The query of “WHAT for” vs. authority was never considered.

> Good. Now get rid of “0bammacare”.

BWAHAhahahahaa. (R)N(C) getting rid....govt *facepalm*

Just look @ the BBB: ‘Nibble around the edges’ of fraud, waste & abuse instead via “cuts” (reduction in funding) vs abolishing extra-Constitutional (aka ILLEAGL) programs/spending.

Stupidity & cost (least of all the flagrant ethics violations of GOVT being the ‘negotiator’, ‘employer’, kick-back enjoyer & ‘bank’ of taxpayer $$) NEVER enters into contention when it’s merely the taxpayers left holding the bag

Wake me when the (R)N(C) gets serious about illegal aliens, let alone the Constitution. I’ll know it wasn’t a dream when those in GOVT are arrested/prosecuted for harboring, aiding, abetting, colluding, conspiring+...& they terminate the illegal welfare state.

3 State Governors thumbing their nose at (valid) Federal Law &, instead of hand-cuffs, they were given a tongue-lashing *facepalm*

There’s no such thing as ‘public land’, least of all ‘Federal land’ (outside of D.C.)

It instead in the STATE’S in which it resides.

>Our federal government is made up of big spending Republicans, bigger spending Democrats, and Thomas Massie.

And the 2 former brought out the knives vs. Massie *facepalm*

>The last DOGE savings was on May 9. Since that date, the total of savings has remained at 170 billion dollars.

Oh? Were the ‘saving’ put into a bill? Was (the illegal) USAID eliminated?? Then, there’s $0 “savings”

>So much for all the hype about reducing our debt and being fiscally conservative.

“Conservative” merely == conserving the status quo. The faux ‘small govt’ hype died in ‘16

>Aging people on SNAP will be required to work, under this bill

As if another bill won’t be used to undo this *Facepalm*

So much for that party of “small govt” *rolls eyes*

>If we simply got rid of the federal reserve bank and made their function part of Treasury, we could pay off the national debt in 5 years, abolish income taxes the year after.

As A1S10 has NEVER been Amended & Congress cannot (legally/Constitutionally) bequeath its powers/authority to another entity; esp. a non-govt entity, it should be deemed null/void.

Much the same vs. 16th A., as it violates the 4th, 5th, 13th & 14th on its face.

Unfort., we have a 3-legged house-of-cards that none dare decree the ‘king has no clothes’ *shrug*

>On the plus side, as much as it would hurt, if the US inhoused most of its debt, it could legislatively cancel it.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
- A14 S4

Course, IF you could get govt to say what it passed via “law” was actually UN-lawful (which, most of govt spending *IS* [vs. Constitutional restrictions])....

>Fire everyone and start over

Ya had me until ‘and’

As if govt will *ever* NOT grow back to what we have currently.

The only TRUE, legal, solution: If it’s not Const. authorized == immediate abolition.

>
Remember every last headline and first paragraph for the last 20 years. It’s always the conservatives losing.

Note that. It’s always the conservatives losing. It gets real old seeing the GOP win over us.
>

Well, ‘conservatives’ merely conserve the status quo *shrug*

Plus, the base KEEP (re-)electing those that stab ‘em in the back, proving the “problem” isn’t D.C. but the base.

(L) keep getting to say, “Told ya so” every 2 yrs. Shame nobody else heeds those warnings

>We seriously need to get back to understanding the difference between a “right” and a “privilege.”

Same w/ those entitlements. If the taxpayers, via govt, ‘provide’ {X}, {X} isn’t “Mine/yours”.

IE: Those screaming ‘cuts’ to O’Care threaten “their” h’care

>All political “donations” from all unions who receive taxpayer dollars should be illegal. That is, by definition, money laundering.

MINIMALLY, it’s a conflict of interest & ethics violation.

Unfort., we all known govt & their lackeys don’t play by the same rules govt imposes upon We the People/biz

>
>>
“No public service group at any government level should be allowed to unionize.”
>>

No group, at any level, should be allowed to unionize as it drives out manufacturing and funds the Democrats
>

Easier & further reaching: No entity with the inability to vote shall donate, bequeath, supply+ *ANY* time, funds, property, manual labor+ to any governmental dept, agency, entity, NGO, subsidiary+

Let the Fed. Teachers Assoc. bloviate & spend their union taxes....just not to govt. Their conflict of interest, & power thereof, via donating to (majorly) Leftists ENDS.