I get it, you and most of society have liberal views about race. That includes so-called conservatives, who will deny reality of racial differences, even deny the very well-designed arguments of their own revolutionary heroes, in mortal terror of violating political correctness, and will banish non-pc dissent from internet forums lest they be associated with such heresy, I get it all too well.
Show me any majority non-white country which cherished and practices the “color-blindness” and diversity-worship pushed by suicidal white-led societies.
Up until the 1960s, the ideas and policies of the founders cited in that article held sway. Yet you denounce them. Therefore, in your mind, the ideas which replaced them — those of the 1960s activists — are superior, no?
Riiiight, I identify with the alt-right, and I articulate the alt-right position here, on a thread about Hillary denouncing the alt-right, so that makes me a Hillary agent. Got it.
Watch this. It’s long, but highly entertaining and profoundly thought-provoking, and Paul Ramsey lays out the historical, factual aspects of how the French, American, and Bolshevik Revolutions(not to mention others) ALL resulted from Enlightenment philosophy, and all share fundamental premises, and all share similar trajectories:
This is probably over your head, but it explains (hilariously in places) why EVERYTHING always slides Leftward, and how so-called conservatives actually help the Left, because they agree with the Left’s Enlightenment premises:
The Soviet Union and the Khmer Rouge, as well as North Korea today — all dystopias of egalitarianism also, just like your cherished soon-to-be train-wreck of what we have here.