Free Republic

For anyone wondering what Hillary the President would look like during an attack on our freedoms or our country, keep this picture at the forefront - this IS the anti-Hillary campaign poster - National Security Threat - "What, me worry?"

Of course, if Tancredo simply advocated beheading an innocent, or perhaps sending suicide bombs into Muslim trains, they would say that would be o.k. - well folks, if several U.S. cities are nuked by extremists, I think its time to call off the kumbaya tactics and propose meaningful response. None of these Muslim protest guys appear apologetic for the hypothetical loss of millions of American lives from potentially nuking US cities, they are just outraged by Tancredo's hypothetical response to the attacks by blasting artificially significant bricks and mortar. God save us all......

This is playing just like before - why did FOX call it for Bush in Ohio - it was too close?

Ohio 2004. Florida 2000 - remember how the Bush lead slowly vanished? Sorry, I worry, as I did 4 years ago. Rats are staged to steal this. Why are we so certain after what we saw in 2000? (I could use some positive view point - I am really unconvinced after the last election)

O'Reilly: Did Clinton Lie?

Rather: Yes, he did

O'Reilly: Is Clinton a liar?

Rather No. I believe he is an honest man.

O'Reilly: How can you say that?

Rather: I believe you can tell lies and still be an honest man.

And some people still trust this guy for their news reports?

Exactly. Preaching to the choir. How does this now-popular and organized group (FR) peacefully assemble its position and it many common believers to actually promote change?

We here all seem aware of the problems, but no one person has the individual ability to promote change or even accountability from leaders from either party (i.e. - our border control).

How does a new "party" emerge in a two party system, without radically changing one of the two existing parties? And how do we organize to gently demand that an existing party make such radical changes?

The answer is not through education, nor through our elected leaders, and the answer is not the MSM. The answer is not violence, and it is not demonstration. It seems that the answer must be open, honest and public discourse at all levels, including national debate provided through and reinforced with internet communication.

Instead of a staged socialist-run debate (the upcoming presidential candidate debates), we need something broadcast effectively, with a disciplined conversation/arguments from both sides. For instance, take a strong spokesperson from each party, have them debate without screaming, insulting, etc., and actually attempt to rationally discuss the issues. Imagine issuing a simple challenge to debate on-line three or four significant issues by internet - Coulter vs. McCualife, for instance.
At that point, I believe the BS would have to stop, much in the same manner as the A/P story about Bush speaking about Clinton's health was corrected when the reporter's credibility was challneged for stating "boos" existed when they did not.....
As you seem to suggest, if rational discourse (i.e. the truth) is no longer defined as provable and objective reasoning, it seems rather necessary and therefore pointless to discuss this only among ourselves....

I care. I care. But how much can you talk about the weather? Bush Bounce?

But Bill Blo' viley is off today - maybe they had no substitute?

Bush Bounce is less newsworthy? - that should be major, no?

Perhaps it is time to roll out the question to all of America and really press this - Do any of us really want Bill Clinton the II, along with with someone who may very well make Hillary look tame - imagine the Hildabeast in the Whitehouse WITH a billion of her own, not chinese, dollars? - to occupy and scandalize the Whitehouse and further shame the U.S.A.?

Kerry has proven himself to be every bit as pathological in the creation of his pseudo-reality as the Clintomaniacs. No one knows anything about this person Kerry, even if they they think they know everything they believe to be true - it is likely all a big lie.

Kerry gets elected, and here we go with the "Clinton fatigue" and the Clinton nationalized agony all over again....only worse!

out

Yes, but you cannot ignore that Mike Moore is praised here and overseas, heros are losers and losers are heros. Order is chaos, reason is intolerance. Morals are hate. You know all the contradictions to sense these days. How does any immoral, insane, horror ever get elected? Yet Hitler came to rule, and Hillbilly Rodham Clinton will make us forget Hitler and create a new standard for evil. The people are misled and hear only what they want to hear. They focus on sports and entertainment (breads and circuses) and do not permit disucssion of God nor politics. This is occuring now, the time is right, and I simply don't think Hillary can wait.

Think Stalin....

But you and the others are already voting - for Hillary, the corruption and manufacture of added votes would be sold as plausible to the country, given she is the "smartest woman in the world", etc.....who cares what we think or vote - there are far more pro abortion, anti gun, pro gay marriage, envorowackos, welfare winners, etc than there are solid true americans - all those masses of "downtrodden" would suddenly come to support the Wicked Curse of a human that is the Rodham one.

Press is NOT ignoring - they are permitting the debate, despite the fact that there has been no substance to Kerry's defense, and his story has continued to change. The press is "giving this legs" and that is unusual. They could be covering far more important stories, but they appear to assign importance for the viewing audience to hear about this. They have the power to turn this issue off - they have chosen not to.

If you actually read the reason why it could NOT happen at the convention and must happen long after, it would seem that your placement of the word "loon" within your comment would be most appropriately self-applied.

Extrapolated, her NY evil applied to the highest office would be immeasurable.....and irreversible

Once again, you presume the election itself is an accurate measure of voting preference. I don't think Clintons could have done more to disgrace this country, and yet they are celebrated as heros - nothing makes sense, so don't count them out!

The more you state there are risks to remaining out of power, the more I believe they will employ any means to secure it and retain it beyond constitutional standards. I cannot believe there are those among us that would put ANYTHING past this demonic couple - any response that relies on convention, fairness, logic or rule of order are immediately concerning.