Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $19,509
24%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 24%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: blackrobedtyrants

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Federal Appeals Court Rejects ‘Invasion’ Claims, Issues New Block on Texas Immigration Law That Gives Police Power to Arrest Illegal Aliens

    03/27/2024 8:53:14 PM PDT · by bitt · 52 replies
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 3/27/2024 | cristina laila
    Last week the US Supreme Court allowed Texas to enforce its immigration law that allows police to arrest illegal aliens. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority rejected an emergency application by the Biden Regime requesting the high court block Texas’ immigration law. The high court temporarily rejected the Biden Regime’s request as litigation made its way through the courts. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week temporarily suspended the immigration law after the Supreme Court rejected the emergency application. A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit in a 2-1 ruling Tuesday night rejected ‘invasion’ claims and issued a new block...
  • Trump ineligible to run for president because of Jan. 6, Colorado court rules in historic decision

    12/19/2023 3:23:52 PM PST · by TomServo · 240 replies
    ABC News ^ | 12/19/2023 | Isabella Murray
    Former President Donald Trump is ineligible under the 14th Amendment to run for president in 2024, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday -- a historic decision that sets up a battle before the nation's highest court.
  • Supreme Court won’t hear case brought by a group of voters against Dominion Voting Systems and Facebook

    12/05/2022 2:07:57 PM PST · by JSM_Liberty · 65 replies
    CNN ^ | 11:59 AM EST, Mon December 5, 2022 | Devan Cole
    The Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a case brought against Dominion Voting Systems and Facebook after the 2020 election by a group of voters who claimed the companies illegally “influenced or interfered with” the contest. Lower courts had previously rejected the case, ruling that the eight voters lacked the procedural threshold – known as standing – needed to bring the suit against parties including the Center for Tech and Civic Life, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan. “The court’s refusal to take up this case is no surprise; the lower courts threw it out...
  • Federal judge overturns parts of Florida election law, citing ‘horrendous history’ of racism

    04/01/2022 10:48:47 AM PDT · by where's_the_Outrage? · 68 replies
    Politico ^ | Mar 31, 2022 | Gary Fineout
    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal judge on Thursday struck down key provisions of a 2021 Florida election law championed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and, in a remarkable move, ruled the state must get court approval for the next 10 years before it enacts further changes in three areas. Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker, in a blistering 288-page decision, said the law placed restrictions on voters that were unconstitutional and discriminated against minority citizens. Those included limits on drop boxes used for mail-in voting, on giving items to voters waiting in line and new requirements placed on voter registration groups....
  • Pennsylvania Judge Reinstates 5 Ousted School Board Members

    04/01/2022 6:45:31 PM PDT · by lightman · 1 replies
    epoch times ^ | 1 April A.D. 2022 | Beth Brelje
    The Pennsylvania judge who ordered Tuesday to remove five elected school directors from the nine-member West Chester Area School board, reinstated them Friday. But the saga is not over; they could be booted again. The five were removed on a technicality. There was a dispute over how much time the school had to respond to a petition filed by West Chester Area School District parent Beth Ann Rosica. In that petition, she calls for the removal of five school board members—Sue Tiernan, Joyce Chester, Karen Herman, Kate Shaw, and Daryl Durnell—for not representing constituents. Initially, Judge William P. Mahon in...
  • Supreme Court rejects religious challenge to NY vaccine mandate

    12/13/2021 1:15:34 PM PST · by ducttape45 · 45 replies
    Faux News ^ | 12/13/2021 | Jessica Chasmar
    The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block a New York regulation that requires health care workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine without any religious exemptions.The vaccine mandate for health care workers, which went into effect in August, allows only for medical exemptions but not religious ones. The Supreme Court turned away two applications from doctors and nurses in the state for injunctive relief to allow religious exemptions while litigation continues in the lower courts over the mandate's constitutionality.
  • U.S. Supreme Court rejects religious challenge to Maine vaccine mandate

    10/29/2021 3:21:56 PM PDT · by Golden Eagle · 118 replies
    Rueters ^ | October 29, 2021 | Lawrence Hurley
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday turned away healthcare workers seeking a religious exemption to Maine's COVID-19 vaccine mandate in the latest battle over vaccination to reach the justices. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, rejected a request made by nine unnamed plaintiffs who identified themselves as healthcare workers who object to receiving the shots on religious grounds. The court previously rejected challenges to vaccine mandates in New York and Indiana, though those cases did not involve religious objections. The justices were divided, with three conservative members saying they would have granted the request. In...
  • U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Refuses To Block Indiana University’s Vaccine Mandate For Students.

    08/12/2021 2:26:42 PM PDT · by Enlightened1 · 178 replies
    JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett refuses to block Indiana University’s vaccine mandate for students. She acted alone and gave no explanation. https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1425929920610541568
  • U.S. Supreme Court won’t hear Nevada church’s COVID-19 case

    01/26/2021 11:37:28 AM PST · by thegagline · 15 replies
    The Las Vegas Sun ^ | 01/25/2021 | Scott Sooner
    RENO — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused a rural Nevada church’s request to enter a legal battle over the government’s authority to limit the size of religious gatherings amid the COVID-19 pandemic — after the church won an appeals court ruling last month that found Nevada’s restrictions unconstitutional. Attorneys general from 19 other states had recently joined in support of the unusual request from Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley east of Reno. They were urging the Supreme Court to rule on the merits of the Nevada case to help bring uniformity to various standards courts across the country have...
  • Supreme Court rules federal civil rights law protects LGBT workers

    06/15/2020 7:22:54 AM PDT · by Stravinsky · 172 replies
    CBS News ^ | June 15, 2020` | Melissa Quinn
    Washington — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that it is illegal for an employer to fire someone because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, delivering a major victory in the fight for civil rights for LGBT people. The court's 6-3 ruling extends the scope of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin and religion, to include LGBT people. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch, who authored the majority's opinion, joined the liberal wing of the bench in ruling that "an employer who fires an...
  • Federal court blocks Trump asylum rules hours after judge ruled to keep restrictions in place

    07/24/2019 6:17:38 PM PDT · by Hojczyk · 70 replies
    Fox News ^ | July 24,2019 | Bradford Betz, Ronn Blitzer
    Wednesday blocked the Trump administration from imposing restrictions on individuals seeking asylum in the United States, just hours after a judge in Washington had decided to let the rule stand while lawsuits play out in court. The rule, published in the Federal Register last week, required people seeking asylum to apply first in one of the countries they cross on their way to the U.S. -- with certain exceptions. It targeted tens of thousands of Central Americans who have crossed Mexico each month trying to enter the U.S. The rule was met quickly with a legal challenge from advocacy groups,...
  • Trump's agenda hampered by troubling number of lower court injunctions, Barr says

    05/22/2019 1:35:02 AM PDT · by blueplum · 11 replies
    Fox News ^ | 21 May 2019 | Edmund DeMarche
    Attorney General William Barr on Tuesday said he has noticed a troubling trend of nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts that have taken their toll on President Trump’s agenda and threaten the political process for future administrations. Barr, who has been accused by Democrats of protecting Trump after the release of the Mueller report, told the American Law Institute that there is a new trend of judicial "willingness" to review executive action, which injects courts into the political process... ...Vice President Mike Pence recently said the administration will ask the Supreme Court to bar them.... ...Barr said nationwide injunctions violate...
  • Judge rules Trump executive order allowing offshore drilling in Arctic Ocean unlawful

    03/30/2019 2:48:23 PM PDT · by Innovative · 121 replies
    CNN ^ | March 30, 2019 | Kevin Bohn
    A federal judge in Alaska has ruled an executive order by President Donald Trump allowing offshore oil drilling of tens of millions of acres in the Arctic Ocean is "unlawful and invalid." The ruling on Friday from US District Court Judge Sharon Gleason means a drilling ban for much of the Arctic Ocean off of Alaska will go back into effect. On April 28, 2017, Trump issued an executive order reversing three memoranda and one executive order in 2015 and 2016 by then President Barack Obama withdrawing about 125 million acres of the Arctic Ocean from oil leasing. The Obama...
  • The Fourth Circuit Runs Roughshod over Heller and the Second Amendment

    02/22/2017 12:26:00 PM PST · by Sgt_Schultze · 35 replies
    National Review ^ | 22 Feb 2017 | CHARLES C. W. COOKE
    Freed up by the Supreme Court’s ongoing reluctance to engage in depth with the Second Amendment, the Fourth Circuit has taken it upon itself to rewrite Heller en banc. In a 10-4 decision, issued yesterday afternoon, the court upheld Maryland’s ban on both “assault weapons” and “high capacity magazines.” By so doing, it deprived the people of Maryland, the Carolinas, and the Virginias of the core protections to which the Constitution entitles them. As Judge Traxler’s dissent pointedly establishes, the majority achieved this transformation by contriving “a heretofore unknown ‘test,’ which is whether the firearm in question is ‘most useful...
  • Trump Could Simply Ignore Court’s Order Halting Travel Ban

    02/08/2017 9:42:04 AM PST · by Sean_Anthony · 60 replies
    Canada Free Press ^ | 02/08/17 | Selwyn Duke
    Betrayed the letter and spirit of our nation's founding: Allowed the courts to run amok. We can continue drinking the judicial-supremacy Kool-Aid, committing national suicide, or we can drain the swamp infested with with black-robed tyrants Does our current status quo make our Constitution a suicide pact? Thomas Jefferson certainly said as much, warning that accepting judicial supremacy would make our founding document just that, a felo de se, as he put it in Latin. Acceptance of judicial supremacy, by the way, is precisely why President Trump’s temporary ban on immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations is on hold. Imagine that,...
  • 'Muslim ban' injunction is a judicial coup against President Trump (unconstitutional)

    02/04/2017 4:35:48 AM PST · by NYer · 81 replies
    American Thinker ^ | February 4, 2017 | Ed Straker
    Federal district Judge James Robart of Seattle ordered a complete, nationwide temporary restraining order against President Trump's temporary ban on visitors from seven Middle Eastern countries.  If you read the ruling as I have, you can see this is clearly unconstitutional on its face, and constitutes a judicial coup against President Trump and the executive branch. 1) The standards for granting a temporary restraining order are quite high. The plaintiff must show that he is likely to succeed on the merits, and would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction were not granted.  Here the people from the excluded countries cannot...
  • Judge Stays Most of Ohio Gay Marriage Ruling

    04/16/2014 10:01:08 AM PDT · by SeekAndFind · 121 replies
    ABC News ^ | 04/16/2014 | AMANDA LEE MYERS
    Ohio officials must immediately recognize the same-sex marriages of four couples who sued over the state's gay marriage ban, a federal judge said Wednesday, while staying the broader effects of his ruling to avoid "premature celebration and confusion" in case it's overturned on appeal. Judge Timothy Black stayed his ruling ordering Ohio to recognize the marriages of gay couples who wed in other states pending appeal in the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. The appeals process likely will take months. Had Black not issued the stay, all married gay couples living in Ohio would have been able...
  • New Jersey: Court Upholds Man Arrested For Visible Gun Case In Car

    05/28/2013 6:19:11 PM PDT · by KOZ. · 125 replies
    www.thenewspaper.com ^ | 5/27/2013 | http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/41/4110.asp
    New Jersey: Court Upholds Man Arrested For Visible Gun Case In Car New Jersey appellate court upholds five-year sentence for ex-cop who was driving with his legally owned guns. Readington TownshipMotorists driving through New Jersey can be subjected to a warrantless search if their luggage is similar in appearance to a gun case, an appellate court ruled last week. The Superior Court's Appellate Division upheld a five year prison sentence against Dustin S. Reininger, a former police officer who was in the process of moving from Maine to Texas when a Readington Township police officer recognized the cases in the...
  • Judge: Americans have no right to choose food

    10/06/2011 5:05:22 AM PDT · by tutstar · 126 replies
    WND ^ | 10 6 2011 | Bob Unruh
    A Wisconsin judge has decided – in a fight over families' access to milk from cows they own – that Americans "do not have a fundamental right to consume the milk from their own cow." The ruling comes from Circuit Court Judge Patrick J. Fiedler in a court fight involving a number of families who owned their own cows, but boarded them on a single farm. The judge said that's a "dairy farm" and is subject to the rules and regulations of the state of Wisconsin. "It's always a surprise when a judge says you don't have the fundamental right...
  • Breaking: 4th Circuit Rejects Two Obamacare Challenges on Procedural Grounds

    09/08/2011 9:48:27 AM PDT · by maggief · 31 replies
    Forbes ^ | September 8, 2011 | Avik Roy
    Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has rejected two Obamacare constitutional challenges, on the creative premise that the individual mandate is a tax, and that the Anti-Injunction Act requires that a tax already be implemented in order for plaintiffs to have standing to sue on the basis that a tax is unconstitutional.