Free Republic

Oh, so its a question of how its deployed...does it count then as a WMD if its in an artillery shell next to a road, I mean, IYO?

In my definition, nuclear weapons are the only WMDs.

You probably think an automatic weapon is a WMD, or maybe even an archery set.

The military doesn't protect my rights, that is my responsibility. And if it was your job, you are doing a lousy piece of work I might add. Each year, Americans have fewer 'rights' and worse, an army of real invaders from Mexico secured a capitulation from the DC-tax regime.

You are an enforcer for the DC-tax regime and the policy dreamed up by Ivy League dateless wonders.

Umm, debt financing in the open market, means underwritten by the Chinese.

I am sure you know lots of gubmint paper shufflers/gubmint contractors who had a job prior to 9/11 and still have a job after 9/11. New wars are their meal ticket, and since they already stole from you to make a living, hmm...why would they lie to you? LOL

It's a tactical weapon but no doubt you probably do brown your shorts over such little things.

If you care so little about your countrymen to know of Chalabi's lies, what I can I possibly tell you that will make you Hard on Treason, when clearly you are the sort of useful idiot the Soviets counted on?

No, I don't think tanks and machine guns are weapons mass destructions, indeed I think people should be allowed to own whatever the standing army owns.

That said, I bet the ATF would love to classify all guns as WMDs...and I bet you could be duped into supporting that notion, Leftie.

Deserved 9/11?

LOL, no more than I think 'they hate us for our freedom.'

9/11 occurred because we hired a bunch of government paper shufflers who disarmed the public and completely failed to protect the nation. As we wait for the first paper shuffler to be fired for gross incompetence, you folks keep selling more debt to the Chinese Communists.


The Chinese think your little war in Iraq is quite quaint BTW.

No Mssr. Marx, the point is that sarin is not a weapon of mass destruction.

I believe a handful of soccermoms and boys who like tanks and guns supported a policy of invading Iraq underwritten by the Chinese Communist government.

In order to scare people into supporting the war, stories from the Chalabi led INC supplanted official intelligence estimates and were fed into the news stream. The stories proved to be lies and the people who promoted Chalabi's lies are guilty of extreme-anti-patriotism or 'treason.' That you were duped, there is no question, that you don't aid your country in her time of need is for you to deal with.

Its World War One techonology. You just read too many comic books or are easily freightened. Hardly a reson so send your own countrymen to their death, don't you think?

Lack the courage to sign up yourself?

Did you brown your shorts again?

Do you have any children in Iraq?

Any buddy's from college of high school?

I have numerous times.

You lied about me posting under multiple names.

You spread lies that undermine the administration that link Saddam to 9/11.

You spread lies from a convicted felon, Ahmed Chalabi, involving Salman Pak and weapons of mass destruction that have been discounted by the intelligence agencies in the United States of America.

No, I think you spread lies from the Chalabi camp and are soft on treason.

If there were a thousand, no, a million artillery shells that could at most travel, what, a few miles in the air, would you still think it worth the life of your own son?

Which anti-war folks are you referring to who said "no such substances existed"?

Most folks simply compared what was found after the war to what the pre-war rhetoric suggested they would find. You are lying through your teeth or you are simply a Marxist, to argue even your one inconclusive point that an artillery shell from the Iran-Iraq War is somehow reason for 700 of your countrymen to die--- or wait, you probably do.

Create strawmen all you like, we all know you will never apologize for your sins, but real conservatives see through such phony ploys.

You are clearly an educated fellow; isn't this stuff something less than serious?

An artillery shell filled with mixable ingredients that form 'sarin gas' when exploded????


Your countrymen are in harms way, coming home in body bags or without limbs and yet look how excited the masses get? No adult conservative can think this a healthy situtation.

You are a liberal who thinks he is a conservative, the worst kind. You think violation of a UN resolution is reason to shed American blood. You are as phony as they come when you call yourself a conservative.