Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eschatology and the Power of Myth
The Chalcedon Foundation ^ | 10/16/02 | Greg Uttinger

Posted on 10/16/2002 2:11:40 PM PDT by RnMomof7

Eschatology and the Power of Myth

Greg Uttinger October 2002

C. S. Lewis argued that certain stories have the power to captivate the imagination and move the human soul in ways that the words themselves cannot account for.1 These stories he called "myths." Their power is not, strictly speaking, literary in nature. That is, a myth can work its magic even when it is told in summary or told badly. For example, the average American has not read the Arthurian myth in any of its classic forms. He has not read Mallory, let alone Chrétien de Troyes or Geoffrey of Monmouth. At best, he may have seen Disney's Sword in the Stone or a Hollywood distortion of the legend, like Knight's Tale. In spite of this, the names Arthur, Merlin, and Camelot still have meaning for him. He finds the words "Round Table" and "Holy Grail" charged with significance. Lewis was unwilling to speculate on the source of the power that myths exercise.2 Jung, referring to myths in the broader sense, ventured to speak of archetypes that lie buried in the collective unconscious. Joseph Campbell had similar ideas. As Christians, we must look elsewhere.

Creaturehood and Myth God is the Creator of heaven and earth, and therefore the universe in all its parts bears His imprint. "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork" (Ps. 19:1). Man, however, is the very image of God (Gen. 1:27). So when we look at the things that God has made, especially when God has named them for us or used them in a particularly grand manner, we see reflections of our Maker and also reflections of ourselves. When we use these things in poetry or in story, the effect can be quite powerful.

Think of the words mountain, water, bride, and blood. Contrast them with the words skyscraper, soda, significant other, and plasma. "Sword of the Spirit" carries a power that "machine gun of the Spirit" clearly lacks. And "great red dragon" is worlds away from "friendly purple dinosaur." Furthermore, even though we are fallen, our imaginations still resonate to the whole Biblical story of creation, fall, and redemption. We cannot escape our creaturehood. And herein, at least in part, lies the power of myth.

In myths we regularly have a number of Biblical images or story elements arranged in a pattern that echoes the Biblical story. Sometimes the echo is clear: the prince in disguise, the dragon-slaying knight, the sleeping beauty, the returning king, the thousand-year kingdom. Sometimes the echo is subtler. For example, "the blade that was broken" — either Aragorn's or Sigurd's before him — reflects the sword-image that began at Eden's gate and continues to the two-edged sword in Christ's mouth. Because none of the Biblical blades were broken, we must make further connections. The king's sword is his office and his right to rule: for example, when Arthur broke the sword from the stone, he jeopardized his right to rule; thus, Merlin moved quickly to secure for him Excalibur. Now in redemptive history, the Davidic kingship was broken; the messianic dynasty was seemingly cut off. But with the coming of Christ, the dynasty and kingship were suddenly reforged.

Now, all myths are fiction,3 and some were never meant to be taken as anything else. No one gives primary belief to Middle-Earth or to the mythic elements in the Star Wars saga.4 On the other hand, the Aryan Atlantis, the Master Race, and the Thousand-Year Reich were another matter. There were people who took this mythology very seriously, and millions died as a result. Myths can be very dangerous.

The Dispensationalist Myth Dispensationalism has given us a very powerful myth. The Rapture, the Anti-Christ, the rebuilt Temple, the Great Tribulation — these images, sequenced together and interpreted as they have been for two hundred years in American churches, have stamped a deep impression on the hopes and fears of the average American Christian. Christians who have never read Ezekiel or Zechariah nevertheless assume that a new Temple will stand on Mount Moriah some day soon. Christians who have never studied Revelation 13 are nonetheless afraid of bar coding, government identification numbers, and computer systems that make use of the digits 666. And many, many Christians have found themselves in a deserted classroom or office building and wondered, if only for a moment, "Have I been 'left behind'?"

Now the point is this: dispensationalism no longer survives as a carefully worked out and Biblically defended theological system. It survives primarily as myth. Its mythic quality sustains it, maintains its momentum, and makes it unlikely that we will hear the end of it anytime soon.

On the other hand, traditional dispensationalism of the Darby-Scofield type is dying out. Its multiple gospels and its relegation of Jesus' own sermons to the prior dispensation of Law5 were features so clearly at odds with faith in Christ that younger pastors and teachers simply steered clear of them, though without consciously breaking with the system. This is on the one hand. On the other, popularizers of the movement could never resist the sensationalism of signs and portents. The World Wars, the rise of Bolshevik Russia, and above all the creation of Israel in 1948 were heralded as sure signs that the rapture of the church was at hand. The problem is that traditional dispensationalism taught an imminent, any-moment, signless rapture.

According to the founding fathers of dispensationalism, the prophetic clock stopped ticking at Calvary.6 The Church Age was an unforeseen parenthesis in God's dealings with Israel. Nothing in the Church Age was prophesied in the Old Testament. Therefore, there could be no prophesied signs of its end. Only with the Rapture would the prophetic clock start afresh. But the man in the pew never really got this, and those hawking sensationalism simply ignored it. Sensationalism built the dispensational myth, but without any regard to the finer points of the system itself.

As a result, the Great Tribulation and Rapture are still fixtures in the evangelical mindset, but evangelical theologians are no longer quite sure about the nature of the dispensational system itself. At least no one is writing detailed dissertations on God's two eternally distinct peoples, Israel and the church. No one is arguing for a signless rapture and a frozen prophetic clock. Grace and Talbot Seminaries have quietly moved away from their strict dispensational legacies, and Dallas is still working on the details of its new and improved brand of dispensationalism.7

But the dispensational myth continues. And it is a myth; that is, it is fictional creation that contains a powerful use of Biblical images and a powerful echo of the Biblical story. The Rapture has Biblical precedent in Noah's embarking seven days before the rains began, in Lot's escape from Sodom hours before the fires fell, and in the flight of Christians from Jerusalem in AD 70 just before the siege began. The mythic Anti-Christ echoes Nimrod, Antiochus Epiphanes, Herod the Great, and Nero. The Great Tribulation bears some resemblance to the plagues on Egypt and the real Great Tribulation in AD 70. Oddly, the Biblical echo here is fainter. The Great Tribulation of pop dispensationalism, unlike that described by our Lord in the Olivet Discourse (Mt. 24; Mk. 13; Lk. 21), is mostly the reign of hell on earth and has little to do with the active judgment of God. With the church and the Spirit withdrawn at the Rapture, Satan gets to have his fling on earth, and he seems to have a penchant for nuclear and biological warfare.8

Of course, these echoes are only echoes, not accurate interpretations of Scripture. Certainly, the Bible speaks of a rapture, but dispensational writers somehow overlook the fact that it will be neither silent nor secretive (1 Thes. 4:15-5:4). It will accompany the Resurrection, which will swallow up Death, the final enemy (cf. 1 Cor. 15:51-55; Rev. 20:11-14). Dispensational writers never seem to notice that the word "antichrist" only appears in 1 and 2 John and is associated there with false teachers who deny the Incarnation.9 And no dispensational writer accepts as literal truth our Lord's clear time frame for the Great Tribulation: "this generation" that is, His own (Mt. 24:34; Mk. 13:30; Lk. 21:31-32; cf. Mt. 23:29-36).

At present, the dispensational myth is being fueled by Tim LaHaye's best selling Left Behind series. The strategy behind the series is sound: fuel a deeply held myth with fast-paced fiction about likable characters who are never far from occult forces and human violence — then turn it into a film.10 The books sell, the myth becomes more deeply engrained, and nobody has to debate theology or answer embarrassing exegetical questions.

Diffusing a Myth So, how do you diffuse a myth?

A counter-myth might have some success. And we may hope that the current run of Lord of the Rings will exercise a greater sway over the hearts and minds of the young than the Left Behind books and films. Better a generation of Rangers and hobbits who are willing to fight for Middle-Earth than one of cultural retreatists who don't plan on being around much longer.

But ultimately, myths must be overturned by the clear and repetitive proclamation of truth. The preaching of Christ crucified overturned the oracles, the mysteries, and the magic of the pagan world.11 It eclipsed Gaea, buried Osiris, and banished Balder. It can overturn the Tribulation myth as well. But we must tell the whole truth, the whole gospel: the Sovereign Creator; man's transgression of His law; man's true moral guilt; the wrath of an offended God; the true Incarnation of the Word; the blood atonement; the Resurrection and Ascension; the defeat of Satan; the end of Jewish ceremonies; the coming of the Kingdom; justification by faith; the power of the Spirit; the victory of the gospel; the final Judgment; and our own Resurrection. Truncated gospels and isolated snippets of theology, however orthodox, will not answer a cultural myth. We must answer a system with a system and a story with the Story.

When a thousand years from now historians evaluate our age, they will probably reckon it as one of the most superstitious in the history of the world. Cosmic and biological evolution will, of course, be counted as the chief and most permeating superstitions. The whole Nazi mythology may be next, followed by some Marxist and Keynesian ideas about economic history and the nature of the economy. UFOs, white racism, reincarnation, and the goddess reborn will all receive some sort of footnote. But for the superstition that held the greatest sway among professing Christians, the Tribulation myth will be the clear winner. Future scholars will wonder that self-professed Christians ever believed such a thing; but perhaps they will take into account the folly of our age and the power of myth.

Notes

1. C. S. Lewis, An Experiment in Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961), 41. 2. Ibid., 44ff. 3. Yes, C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien both spoke of Christianity as a "true myth." But they knew they were dealing in paradox. 4. I have been told that in a recent survey in Great Britain a large number of people listed their religion as "Jedi Knight." We will hope they were joking. 5. See Philip Mauro, The Gospel of the Kingdom (Swengel, PA: Bible Truth Depot, n.d.), ch. VI and XI, for the relevant citations from C. I. Scofield and a response to them. 6. For a number of relevant quotes, see Loraine Boettner, The Millennium (Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1957), 219ff. 7. See Gary North, Rapture Fever, Why Dispensationalism Is Paralyzed (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1993), 195ff. 8. The dispensational Great Tribulation has become the evangelical substitute for the doctrine of hell. The Great Tribulation, as bad as it is, is kinder and gentler. Some survive it, some come to Christ in the midst of it, it only lasts seven years, and it is mostly the work of Satan and the Anti-Christ: evangelicals still can frighten people towards Christ without suggesting that a loving God would ever pour out His wrath on sinners. 9. They could dump the word "antichrist" and talk only about the Beast, but "Anti-Christ" is a more powerful word. 10. This might sound an awful lot like the Harry Potter franchise, but Potter works more from folk superstition than from true myth, at least so far. 11. See Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Divine Wor.

Greg Uttinger teaches theology, history, and literature at Cornerstone Christian School in Roseville, California. He lives nearby in Sacramento County with his wife, Kate, and their three children. He may be contacted at paul_ryland@hotmail.com.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: endtimes; eschatology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
Having read alot of Amil "apologetics " I have come away feeling that everyone has a select proof text.

When I read this yesterday it was the first thing that rang some bells for me..I had asked for an opinion from one of my friends ..but none was forthcoming ..so I will put it to those interested what cha al lthink??

1 posted on 10/16/2002 2:11:40 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian; winstonchurchill; Hank Kerchief; P-Marlowe; KennyV; Woodkirk; Jerry_M; ...
End times discussion Bump
2 posted on 10/16/2002 2:14:38 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


According to the founding fathers of dispensationalism, the prophetic clock stopped ticking at Calvary.6 The Church Age was an unforeseen parenthesis in God's dealings with Israel. Nothing in the Church Age was prophesied in the Old Testament. Therefore, there could be no prophesied signs of its end. Only with the Rapture would the prophetic clock start afresh. But the man in the pew never really got this, and those hawking sensationalism simply ignored it. Sensationalism built the dispensational myth, but without any regard to the finer points of the system itself.

As a result, the Great Tribulation and Rapture are still fixtures in the evangelical mindset, but evangelical theologians are no longer quite sure about the nature of the dispensational system itself. At least no one is writing detailed dissertations on God's two eternally distinct peoples, Israel and the church. No one is arguing for a signless rapture and a frozen prophetic clock. Grace and Talbot Seminaries have quietly moved away from their strict dispensational legacies, and Dallas is still working on the details of its new and improved brand of dispensationalism.

I find this a strong argument
3 posted on 10/16/2002 2:20:29 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Fascinating:)
4 posted on 10/16/2002 2:24:09 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Being "Amil" myself, this rings true to me. When I look at the whole of scripture, the only position I can be is "Amil".
5 posted on 10/16/2002 2:29:03 PM PDT by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
But for the superstition that held the greatest sway among professing Christians, the Tribulation myth will be the clear winner. Future scholars will wonder that self-professed Christians ever believed such a thing; but perhaps they will take into account the folly of our age and the power of myth.

Just as the power of myth affected entire nations throughout history, so, too, are we affected by the trappings of this Left Behind theology. Dispensationalism isn't just a harmless, imaginative little fairy tale. It affects how we view our role as believers in the Body of Christ. It affects how we vote in presidential elections. It affects how we evangelize (and also how we don't evangelize). It affects Christian politicians who design our foreign policy. It affects those in political office who decide the fate of soldiers on the battlefield.

The implications of dispensationalism stretch far beyond the pulpit. Some Christians actually equate how we view eschatology with how we view our own salvation.

6 posted on 10/16/2002 2:44:56 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; fortheDeclaration
I'll get back to this....church calls. However, quickly, the premills are the only ones concerned with fitting the prophecies into a current events lesson. All the others were content with just sitting back 'cause they're the church so "don't worry be happy" was the way to be.

Lots of interpretive miscues, reconfigurations, misdirections....but after centuries of ignoring these biblical issues SOMEONE had to start from scratch.

There was a time when the doctrine of grace was being "rediscovered" that it went through a period of shaping.
7 posted on 10/16/2002 2:45:40 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
print later
8 posted on 10/16/2002 2:58:45 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
There was a time when the doctrine of grace was being "rediscovered" that it went through a period of shaping.

The Church at its beginning, for the first two centuries, premillennial.

With Amillennialism came the combination of church and state and the growth of legalism.

We can thank Origen and Augustine for that!

9 posted on 10/16/2002 3:40:41 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
What does dispensation to you?
10 posted on 10/16/2002 3:50:26 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Slanted clap-trap. Sets up multiple straw men (calls them unflattering names), then knocks them down. Where's the beef?
11 posted on 10/16/2002 4:05:18 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
I have an RC daughter that is reading the Left Behind series...We had a serious doctrinal discussion yesterday and I found out that the books have impacted her belief system ...She indicated that she was going to leave the church...(She decided a year ago to raise her daughters Protestant..I suspect it has been the books)

I have never believed in the dispensational pre mil..so I never liked the books...but they are making people consider their eternity..Hey Shelt ..if God could speak through a donkey ..He can talk through those books:>)

12 posted on 10/16/2002 4:33:33 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian
What struck me was the point that there is no prophecy regarding the church in the OT....gotta look at that
13 posted on 10/16/2002 4:35:07 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
And no dispensational writer accepts as literal truth our Lord's clear time frame for the Great Tribulation: "this generation" that is, His own (Mt. 24:34; Mk. 13:30; Lk. 21:31-32; cf. Mt. 23:29-36).

This is so muddle-headed as to incomprehensive.

"this generation will not pass..." is in the aorist tense ( meaning to any Greek reader that it means " now and forever") not the present tense ( current generation)

This is the literal truth.

Acts 17:11 Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the
Thessalonians, for they received the message with great
eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if
what Paul said was true.

chuck <truth@Y'shuaHaMashiach>

14 posted on 10/16/2002 4:50:25 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Thanks for that insite ...
15 posted on 10/16/2002 5:05:23 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; fortheDeclaration
no church in the OT

That's not accurate, Rn, imho. In the OT, the church appears as the "gentiles."

Look for the prophecies about the gentiles coming to Christ.

Isaiah 11:10 And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.

Isaiah 42:1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.

Isaiah 42:6 I the LORD have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles;

Isaiah 49:6 And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth.

Isaiah 49:22 Thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I will lift up mine hand to the Gentiles, and set up my standard to the people: and they shall bring thy sons in their arms, and thy daughters shall be carried upon their shoulders.

Isaiah 60:3 And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.

16 posted on 10/16/2002 6:18:16 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Please write out what you think the verse says if properly translated using the aorist. If you don't mind, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
17 posted on 10/16/2002 6:20:50 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
What struck me was the point that there is no prophecy regarding the church in the OT....gotta look at that

I don't believe that either. Just off the top of my head I can think of one indirect reference to the church (in the Messianic prophecy):

I will keep you and will make you to be a covenant for the people and a light for the Gentiles, to open eyes that are blind, to free captives from prison and to release from the dungeon those who sit in darkness.
Isaiah 42:6-7

Sounds like Jesus and His church to me.

The rest of the posted article is of equal value IMO. Worthless.

18 posted on 10/16/2002 6:26:11 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I see you beat me to it and more.
19 posted on 10/16/2002 6:27:24 PM PDT by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian; RnMomof7; fortheDeclaration
Actually, one of my favorites is in Dan 2 and concerns the stone that struck the feet of Nebuchadnezzar's statue.

Dan 2:35 Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth. 36 This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.

44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.

20 posted on 10/16/2002 6:35:53 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson