Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2023 6:28:27 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow

Excellent


2 posted on 03/13/2023 6:34:08 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (No Doubt Now: Stolen Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

In an ocean of evil BS, it’s nice to occasionally see an ounce of sanity.


3 posted on 03/13/2023 6:37:21 PM PDT by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
The Democrat position (they lost this time) is that adoption agencies *must* connive at child sex trafficking.

Current law is that they *may*.

4 posted on 03/13/2023 6:41:23 PM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

Good news for a change!


5 posted on 03/13/2023 6:48:07 PM PDT by Guenevere (“If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
In addition to paying legal fees, the New York State Office of Children and Family Services will also allow New Hope Family Services to continue its religiously-influenced policies.

Mighty white of them.

6 posted on 03/13/2023 6:53:31 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?" Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

New York taxpayers.


7 posted on 03/13/2023 7:34:20 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
In 2018, OCFS concluded that New Hope was violating a 2013 state law that barred discrimination against adoption service applicants based on sexual orientation and marital status.

Civil rights (=protected groups) are to apply to groups based upon such non-moral aspects as race, skin color, nationality, etc., versus how one feels as regards attraction and or what gender or species they choose to I.D. as, even if transitory. Since it applies to the latter, then discrimination against groups based upon based upon religious affection and identification cannot be consistently justified, even without the 1st. Amendment.

8 posted on 03/13/2023 7:36:42 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

I was adopted as an infant by a loving Christian family and cannot even fathom the horror of being adopted by homosexuals.


9 posted on 03/13/2023 7:43:24 PM PDT by BuchananBrigadeTrumpFan (If in doubt, it's probably sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow

No more Zulocks!


12 posted on 03/13/2023 9:04:41 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson