But there was the Scripture that was compiled to make the Bible so your argument falls flat. It has no substance or basis because the SCRIPTURE that makes up the Bible WAS in existence.
“But there was the Scripture that was compiled to make the Bible so your argument falls flat.”
No, that fact in no way compromises what I said. What I said is still irrefutably true. I very deliberately used that example because it proved the point while also immediately cutting away the underpinnings of Protestantism.
“It has no substance or basis because the SCRIPTURE that makes up the Bible WAS in existence.”
The books were - yet you reject seven of them. Again, my point is proven.