Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”
Rorate Caeli ^ | November 8, 2017 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”

Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
November 8 2017




On October 31st 2016, Pope Francis inaugurated the year of Luther by meeting with representatives of Lutheranism from all over the world in the Swedish Cathedral of Lund. Since then, meetings and “ecumenical” celebrations ad abundantiam have followed one after the other in the Catholic Church.

A year exactly from that date, the “”Lutheran turning point ”was sealed by a symbolic act the gravity of which very few have noticed. The Vatican Post Office issued a stamp which celebrates the birth of Protestantism on October 31st 1517, the date Luther hung his 95 theses on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral.

V Centenary of the Protestant Reformationcan be read at the top of the stamp, presented on October 31st of this year by the Vatican Philatelic Office.  The official communiqué describes the stamp: It depicts Jesus Crucified in the foreground on a gold, timeless background showing Wittenberg city. In an attitude of penance, on their knees respectively on the left and the right of the the Cross, Martin Luther holds a Bible, source and point of his doctrine, while Philip Melanchthon, theologian and a friend of Martin Luther’s, one of the most important protagonists of the Reformation, holds in his hand the Augsburg Confession, Confessio Augustuana, the first official exposition of the principles of Protestantism drawn up by him.”

The substitution of Our Lady and St. John at the foot of the Cross with the  two heresiarchs, Luther and Melanchthon is a blasphemous offense that no Catholic cardinal or bishop has, to date, openly condemned. The significance of this image is explained by the joint declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, published the same day as the stamp. The note refers to the positive outcome of the dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, endorsing the “new understanding of those XVI century events which lead to our separation” and affirms how both sides are “very grateful for the theological and spiritual gifts received through the Reformation”.


As if that weren’t enough, around the same time, La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope’s “unofficial” voice, celebrated Luther  with  an article by Father Giancarlo Pani (Martin Luther, Five Hundred Years Later, in La Civiltà Cattolica , of October 21st – November 4th 2017, pp. 119-130)

Father Pani is the same priest who said in 2014 that the Fathers of the Council of Trent had admitted the possibility of divorce and remarriage in the case of adultery, according to the custom established in the schismatic Greek Church. Now he is sustaining that Martin Luther was in no way a heretic, but an authentic “reformer”.  In fact, “ the theses of Wittenberg are not a challenge, nor a rebellion against authority, but the proposal to renew the proclamation of the Gospel, in the sincere desire for a “reform” in the Church”. (p.128). Despite the claim “ by the Church of Rome and Luther of incarnating the truth in toto and being dispensers of it ” “ the role Luther had as a witness to the faith cannot be denied: He is “the reformer”;  he was able to initiate a process of “reform”  where the results of it  have also benefited the Catholic Church.”

If this is the case then he has been unjustly persecuted and defamed by the Catholic Church for 500 years. The time has come to rehabilitate him.  And in order to rehabilitate him we cannot limit ourselves to presenting only his prophetic side, but must make the Church accept and put into practice his demands of reform. And the Post-Synod Exhortation Amoris Laetitia represents a decisive stage on this path. They are not wrong then the authors of the Correctio filialis  (to Pope Francis) when they underlined “the affinity between Luther’s ideas on the law, justification and matrimony and those taught  or favored by Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia and elsewhere.” 

At this point it should be remembered that Pope Francis, like Father Pani, belongs to the Company of Jesus, whose Founder, St. Ignatius of Loyola, was the champion of the Faith that Divine Providence raised up in the XVI century against Lutheranism. In Germany, apostles like St. Peter Canisio and Blessed Peter Fabro, fought every inch of the way against the heretics and on the terrain of anti-Protestant controversy no-one can surpass St. Robert Bellarmino.

La Civiltà Cattolica was founded in 1850, with the support of Pius IX, and had a role of doctrinal defense against the errors of the time for a very long time. From its very first edition, on April 6th 1850, it dedicated an extensive anonymous essay (by Father Matteo Liberatore) on The Political Rationalism of the Italian Revolution, in which he saw Protestantism as the cause of all modern errors. These theses were developed, among others, by two famous Jesuit theologians: Fathers Giovanni Perrone (Protestantism and the Rule of the Faith, La Civiltà Cattolica, Rome 1853, 2 voll.), and Hartmann Grisar (Luther, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1911/1912, 3 voll.).

But the commemoration of the Lutheran revolt made by the Jesuit journal in October 1917, the fourth centenary marking the 95 theses in Wittenberg, takes on a special meaning.  (Luther and Lutheranism, in La Civiltà Cattolica, IV (1917), pp. 207-233; 421-430). The theologian of La Civiltà Cattolica explained that “The essence of the Lutheran spirit, or rather Lutheranism, is rebellion in all of its extension and in all the force of its word. Rebellion, therefore, which is personified in Luther, was varied and profound, complex and very vast; which apparently appeared but was in fact violent, angry, trivial, obscene and diabolic; deep down it was studied, and directed according to the circumstances, focused on opportunistic ends and interests, intended and wanted with  measured, resolute determination.” (pp.208-309).

Luther, La Civiltà Cattolica continues, “initiated that contemptible parody, with which the rebel monk attributed to God, his ideas, blasphemies and the abominations of his perverted mind: he outraged the Pope in an unspeakable way in the name of Christ, he cursed Caesar in the name of Christ, he blasphemed against the Church, against bishops, against monks with absolute infernal impetuosity, in the name of Christ; he threw his religious habit onto the tree of Judas, in the name of Christ and in the name of Christ he was married sacrilegiously” (p.209). “With the very convenient pretext of following Scripture, as that which alone contains the word of God, he conducted a war on scholastic theology, tradition, canon law, all the institutions and precepts of the Church and councils: in place of these august and venerated things, he, Martin Luther, perjured monk and self-proclaimed doctor, put himself and his authority! Popes, doctors and Holy Fathers were no longer of any worth; the word of Marin Luther was worth more than all of them!  (p.212). The Lutheran theory of justification, in the end, “was born of Luther’s imagination, not by the Gospel or any other word of God revealed to the writers of the New Testament: for us, every Lutheran novelty finds its origins in the concupiscence he stimulated, and in his development of the falsification of Scripture or in formal lying” (p.214

Father Pani cannot deny that the opinion he gives of Luther is a 360 degree turnaround from the one his confreres gave in the same journal, a century ago.  In 1917,  he was censured as an apostate, a rebel, a blasphemer; today he is being praised as a reformer, a prophet, [even] holy. No Hegelian dialectic can harmonize yesterday’s judgment with today’s. Luther was either a heretic who denied some basic dogmas of Christianity, or he was a “witness to faith” who initiated  the Reformation of the Church, brought to completion by the Second Vatican Council and Pope Francis.

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

It is time for choices and to mediate precisely on St. Ignatius’ two standards (Spiritual Exercises, n. 137)* which will help us make them in these difficult times.



*Translator’s note: ”It will be here how Christ calls and wants all under His standard; and Lucifer, on the contrary, under his.” (no. 137, Spiritual Exercises).



Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-393 next last
Comment #361 Removed by Moderator

To: ebb tide

So the shoe does fit.

***

Ahahahahah.

You just admitted that the term is accurate.

What a crybaby you are, calls everyone nasty names and then acts all offended when someone returns the favor.

I really shouldn’t cast pearls before swine, but it’s just so FUNNY to watch your hypocrisy.


362 posted on 11/11/2017 8:09:20 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; ealgeone; aMorePerfectUnion; Mark17; Elsie; Boogieman
Are you sober now?

This is your most pathetic attempt yet at avoiding telling us who you hold to be the last valid pope, without which answer any assertion that you have not failed to submit to any Catholic pope is meaningless, let alone what you would consider failing to submit. Again, what's to hide?

Since we seek to answer to your question, "where have I not submitted to any Catholic pope," but are not to badger a poster with a question they refuse to answer, the most I can provide are some things you said in the past, and let others form their opinions of a poster who incessantly attacks a pope, including articles which reject Francis a being a valid one, while presenting himself as one who has not failed to submit to any pope.

In the past you called Evangelli Gaudium to be heretical, an example of formal heresy making Francis/Bergoglio a heretical pope, not just a bad pope , and stated that neither an apostate, nor a heretic, can be a valid pope, and considered the statement of Nostra Aetate (and the CCC) that Muslims"together with us (Catholics) they adore the one, merciful God to be heretical (though it is), and denied submission to Francis, thus at least Francis should be out as one who have been in submission to (no real surprise). But you also disagreed with the statement that "there was no change in Catholic belief regarding the godhead at Vatican II," but (at least last year ) went to FSSP Tridentine Mass, which broke off from the SSPX , and is answerable to pope Francis, and criticized those who attend Mass in Novus Ordo parishes.

Thus both what claimed submission to any pope and who is a real faithful Catholic are subject to interpretation by you as well as others.

363 posted on 11/11/2017 8:20:32 AM PST by daniel1212 (rust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + folllow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

364 posted on 11/11/2017 8:24:42 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Another non-answer.

You are continually being exposed and it seems that everyone can see it but you.

But it also occurs to me that maybe you do see it too, which is why you resort to posts of the likes of yours here.


365 posted on 11/11/2017 8:45:50 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: metmom; boatbums; aMorePerfectUnion
The problem is that we have posted from Catholic sources and then we get the excuse that we need to be” properly trained” to understand it correctly.

Maybe they mean I need a priest to interpret the Catholic sources for me. No thanks. I don’t interpret Catholic sources. I just read it, and tell you what it says. 😆😄👍😂😁 Heard that before?

366 posted on 11/11/2017 8:53:23 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Yes. . IIRC, it’s the “Catholic” method of doing it.

Right?


367 posted on 11/11/2017 9:34:05 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Yes. . IIRC, it’s the “Catholic” method of doing it.

Right?

Exactly. I feel good right now. I just committed the sin of presumption. I don’t like other sins, but I DO like that one. 😇🇵🇭 It’s 2 AM Sunday morning here. Why am I still awake? 🤯😁

368 posted on 11/11/2017 9:51:45 AM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; Arthur McGowan; daniel1212
Have you two Roman Catholics received the ok to post on FR?

Can. 831 §1 Unless there is a just and reasonable cause, no member of Christ's faithful may write in newspapers, pamphlets or periodicals which clearly are accustomed to attack the catholic religion or good morals. Clerics and members of religious institutes may write in them only with the permission of the local Ordinary. - http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P2P.HTM

369 posted on 11/11/2017 10:28:09 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: metmom
The problem is that we have posted from Catholic sources and then we get the excuse that we need to be” properly trained” to understand it correctly.

The Gnostics made similar claims. Only they had the "special" insight.

370 posted on 11/11/2017 10:29:13 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; daniel1212; metmom; Mark17; aMorePerfectUnion; Luircin
Playground rules...ebb. Put up or shut up time.

Who do you consider the last valid pope?

What's to hide?

371 posted on 11/11/2017 10:33:11 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Maybe it is time for all Christians, defined as people who believe that Jesus Christ is their Savior, to stand together against the forces of secularism, atheism and other destructive anti-Christian so-called religions. When Christians spend so much time arguing about who are the "perfect" (only) Christians, they may lose sight of the powerful forces against Christianity in this world.

I don't read these religion discussion threads except for posts when I look at "Latest Posts." There seems to be so much animosity.

372 posted on 11/11/2017 10:44:56 AM PST by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

I did not send this post to any person in particular, just sharing my thoughts on what is happening around the world as Christians are being displaced or even destroyed.


373 posted on 11/11/2017 10:47:09 AM PST by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame
I appreciate your sentiments but where error exists it must be corrected. Paul did not hesitate to address error when he encountered it.

For example, Mormons claim to be Christians yet they are not due to their beliefs.

Our Roman Catholic friends post a lot of material everyday that contains false information. Some of us attempt to contrast what the Bible says and what Roman Catholicism says. On a lot of the important issues the two are in conflict. Roman Catholics don't like it when those are noted.

They also don't like it when Roman Catholic documents are used to show the contradictions within their own denomination.

When confronted with these, a number of Roman Catholics resort to a personal attack and/or profanity and avoid the issue.

For example, one Roman Catholic, who seems to strongly dislike the current pope and doesn't consider him to be legit has been asked who he thinks was the last legit pope. A simple question right?

Yet he refuses to answer for some reason only known to himself.

374 posted on 11/11/2017 10:55:06 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; ebb tide

If his bishop knew about the things he posts and apparently believes; would he be able to receive communion?


375 posted on 11/11/2017 12:44:22 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
Why am I still awake?

Too many good friends and good conversation.

376 posted on 11/11/2017 12:46:18 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Bah!

We don't have to follow THAT; either!


377 posted on 11/11/2017 12:48:58 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Yet he refuses to answer for some reason only known to himself.


Ecclesiastes 10:20

Do not revile the king even in your thoughts,
or curse the rich in your bedroom,
because a bird in the sky may carry your words,
and a bird on the wing may report what you say.

378 posted on 11/11/2017 12:53:46 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; metmom; aMorePerfectUnion; ealgeone
Why am I still awake?

Too many good friends and good conversation.

True, as we discuss things quietly among ourselves. The most beautiful thing, is to talk about assurance of salvation. Just don’t talk to loud, because there are some people around, who have NO assurance of salvation. It’s possible they don’t think ANYONE can have it, and we don’t want to disturb them, so keep it low. 😀😆😄👍🇵🇭

379 posted on 11/11/2017 2:05:47 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
Dude, several posts up I note from Roman Catholic sources they may or may not have the Holy Spirit at all times!

They don't know if they have the Spirit....they don't know if they're saved...man, it must be a nightmare to be Roman Catholic. Everyday lived in fear.

It's amazing the lack of Biblical knowledge among Roman Catholics....and they claim they gave us the Book!

380 posted on 11/11/2017 2:09:32 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson