Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Interesting details.
1 posted on 03/30/2017 7:46:42 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 03/30/2017 7:47:35 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

“The biblical expression “to gird up the loins” meant to put on the belt, thus freeing the lower legs to permit work and easy walking.”

Yeah, but I always read it was more like this: http://www.artofmanliness.com/2014/10/02/how-to-gird-up-your-loins-an-illustrated-guide/

Much like what Japanese samuria did with their tasuki: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs6y2gOfQfI


4 posted on 03/30/2017 8:03:35 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Men also wore a sort of diaper, a piece of cloth wrapped around their “loins”. This was ancient and Jesus is often depicted with such a piece of cloth and I don’t doubt he wore one under his tunic.


6 posted on 03/30/2017 8:07:10 AM PDT by marychesnutfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Interesting. When they say clothes made of cotton did they weave it, use a loom, or some other form of cloth?


7 posted on 03/30/2017 8:16:23 AM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

They wore Carhartt.


8 posted on 03/30/2017 8:23:42 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Keepin' it analog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
"Gird your loins" meant more than cinching the belt:



10 posted on 03/30/2017 8:39:12 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation
In terms of the basics, men and women dressed much alike.

Deuteronomy 22:5, King James Bible
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

So, there must have been a difference.

12 posted on 03/30/2017 8:56:06 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

It has a nice, Biblical ring to it...

-PJ

21 posted on 03/30/2017 9:58:16 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

Aloe has no scent so it must have been used as a base for perfumes.


23 posted on 03/30/2017 10:13:24 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson