Posted on 02/17/2017 2:08:20 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
In the City all day, in conversations with various contacts, so not much from me today.
Except to report on the rapidly growing consensus that the long game is to impose formally onto the existing structures of the Church an entirely new religion.
Over the next nine months look for them to bring in, one at a time (in no particular order):
1) some form of non-canonical female “diaconate” (that we won’t officially call the diaconate, at least not just yet)
2) the mass reinstatement of priests who were laicised in order to get married
3) formalized permission for intercommunion with non-Catholic Christian communities
4) some decree devolving doctrinal jurisdiction to national conferences
5) the declaration of a Council or Council-like assembly of world religious leaders to ratify a pre-written declaration of a global, humanistic, Christ-less Christianity
~
The latest from Fra Cristoforo:
~
Tip-offs on Intercommunion, part IV: whether the C9 are hiding something
by Fra Cristoforo
I begin this post by citing for you an article by Sandro Magister, which confirms all the Tip-offs about intercommunion with the Luterans (read here)
That was just to tell you that we are not making up what we write. But theres more. In these days the famous C9 was held, that is, the council of 9 Cardinals of whom we have spoken before. These 9 Cardinals are the councillors of Bergoglio. And the press office of the Vatican publishes the contents of these meetings, aside from, however, a topic which seems still to have to stay confidential.
That is Intercommunion.
Bergoglio has not managed to attend all the meetings of this C9. It seems that he has not attended only twice.
In one of the meetings in which he participated, the Argentinean Cardinal seems to have pressed not only for the reform of the Curia, but also for the support of the Commission which is currently working on intercommunion with the Protestants. Now, from what Ive been given to believe, it seems that by April these Cardinals must meet together again. And that by then a sort of pastoral letter must be ready which would begin to prepare the people of God for a liturgical ecumenism; therefore pertaining to intercommunion with the Lutherans.
It seems that its a done deal. Without considering the damage which such a thing will provoke. The danger of a schism is I believe already imminent, as indeed Socci has recalled in one of his latest articles (read here)
In the meantime the purges of the Vatican continue. Cardinal Burke has been sent on a mission. Monsignor Negri has been retired in record time. Only the fate of Cardinal Müller is still awaited, which ought to arrive any moment. And its as good as done. All the same, its strange that just yesterday (at the conclusion of the C9), Burkes missionary brief was made known. In fact I wouldnt say its that strange! The C9 has spoken about how to reform the Curia and purify the College of Cardinals.
And if some people are still waiting for Bergoglio to answer the dubia, Ill answer just has he the Pope answered 15 days ago at a dinner: THEYVE GOT ANOTHER THING COMING!
Fra Cristoforo
Christ-less? What the hay does that mean? Perhaps it’s time to find a new pastor, Jeffress, Laurie, Charles Stanley? Just pondering.
I’m so sick of the pro-abortion katholyk church and its pro-abortion bishops I’ll be just as glad to have Bergoglio take the lot of them into schism.
I could name about ten American bishops who will stay Catholic.
Highly doubtful that even one will stay “Catholic”, whatever that means. History is the best predictor of the future. In the wake of Vatican II, EVERY bishop joined the Conciliar Church, was retired or driven out.
There is more visible Catholic Church. What passes for it is a monstrous charade, not unlike the political Establishment here. The people who call themselves Catholic are no more so than GOPe are Conservatives.
“Christ-less Christianity?”
First “Christmas” now this. Someone in the Vatican best check what herbs Don Jorge is brewing up in his yerba mate.
Pro-abortion priests have always puzzled me. How can they possibly justify such a thing given the teachings of the church and the Bible!?
p.s. Pay no attention to the guy complaining about too many religious posts on this forum.
Rewrite Catholicism bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.