Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single Christians Can Have Sex as Long as It's 'Mutually Pleasurable and Affirming,' Pastor Says
Christian Post ^ | August 22, 2016 | Leonardo Blair

Posted on 08/25/2016 5:24:13 PM PDT by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last
To: daniel1212

Documented source(s)?

Oh piffle; it’s just your opinion!

—Catholic_Wannabe_Dude(Hail Mary!)


181 posted on 08/31/2016 3:42:22 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
Is this considered official?


Where can we find an 'OFFICIAL MORMON' teaching website??
Official sites are sites supported by LDS officials unless said official sites are considered unofficial by said officials.
 
At that point such sites are unofficial unless officially referenced for official purposes by officials who can do so officially.
 
This should not be misconstrued as an indication that official sites can be unofficially recognized as official nor should it be implied that unofficial sites cannot contain official information, but are not officially allowed to be offical despite their official contents due the their unofficialness.
 
Official sites will be official and recognized as official by officials of the LDS unless there is an official reason to mark them as unofficial either temporally or permanently, which would make the official content officially unofficial.
 
This is also not to imply that recognized sites, often used on FR by haters and bigots cannot contain official information, it just means that content, despite its official status, is no longer official and should be consider unofficial despite the same information being official on an official site elsewhere.
 
Even then the officialness my be amended due to the use of the unofficial information which may determine the officialness of anything be it official or unofficial depending on how and where it is used officially or unofficially.
I hope this clear things up for the lurkers out there.
The haters tend to make things complicated and confusing when it is all really quite clear.   Crystal ...
--Ejonesie22



182 posted on 08/31/2016 3:45:18 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
McCleneghan, who began her ministry at Hinsdale in July 2015...

Who hired her?

183 posted on 08/31/2016 3:47:45 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
This one was specifically over turned. Sex laws weren’t.

Then, can I assume that, if our soldiers have a nocturnal emission, they should immediately separate from the camp until they can be made clean again so they can join their comrades that evening?

Exactly what changed vs. what did not change - you see to be putting yourself out there as one in the know and I would like to be educated in case you're right.

184 posted on 08/31/2016 3:58:14 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I guess it’s a good thing that Jesus dies for all our sins - past/present’future else Heaven would be an empty place.


185 posted on 08/31/2016 3:59:57 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: trebb

No kidding.

Course all OUR sins were future to Jesus when He died.


186 posted on 08/31/2016 5:17:37 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: trebb

You posted the example of food. God clearly overturned that one.

The NT is full of condemnation of sexual immorality.

Don’t like it? Take it up with God.


187 posted on 08/31/2016 5:23:50 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

The “temptation” is that of sin. The original point I made was that particular behavior was not a sin because I get my definition of sin from violating a commandment which does not include fornication, only adultery.


188 posted on 08/31/2016 5:52:11 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

There are more laws than the big 10.


189 posted on 08/31/2016 6:12:01 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Proudly whipped since late 70s admittedly


190 posted on 08/31/2016 8:16:23 AM PDT by wardaddy (free republic is an aging demographic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: metmom
No kidding. Course all OUR sins were future to Jesus when He died.

But the ones we committed before we were saved can be considered 'past> That doesn't remove the fact that He also died for the sinful acts we would commit after being saved.

191 posted on 08/31/2016 12:45:52 PM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
You posted the example of food. God clearly overturned that one. The NT is full of condemnation of sexual immorality. Don’t like it? Take it up with God.

I have taken it up with Him - often on a daily basis for any number of transgressions - I than k Him for his loving forgiveness .

192 posted on 08/31/2016 12:47:35 PM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: trebb
I than k Him for his CONTINUING loving forgiveness .
193 posted on 08/31/2016 1:40:21 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

suit yourself. Chose the religion you believe and I’ll do the same. Thanx anyway.


194 posted on 08/31/2016 5:20:33 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
thank Him for his CONTINUING loving forgiveness .

Me too - I have no doubts that without it I would be doomed.

He is Good!

195 posted on 09/01/2016 3:30:43 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: trebb
I’m curious about how many Christians are actually virgins when the get married these days.....

Since nobody really attempted to answer the question you actually asked, i'll make an attempt to do so.

ANSWER: Can't say, don't know. HOWEVER, i do know of at least one congregation because they kept extensive records of marriage and births.

The verdict of THAT PARTICULAR CONGREGATION was that approximately 1/3 of the first children of that couple were conceived before marriage. You see many births six or seven months after the couple married.

This does not really answer your question because it is not a record of how many PEOPLE had sex before marriage. It is a record of babies conceived out of wedlock. i would imagine that the number of people having sex outside of marriage in that congregation over it's >100 year existence was higher. Not all sex results in offspring.

So the answer to your question is that "these days" doesn't really have a thing to do with it. This has been going on since Man appeared on Earth.

Speaking of that: Who said that Adam and Eve didn't have sex before the fall? i've heard some Natural Law arguments to the contrary but nobody who can appeal to scripture.

196 posted on 09/01/2016 4:59:56 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord ((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson