Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
Mary of the Bible certainly did have other children... ..

Nope..she certainly may have had step children by Joseph's first marriage but cousins, because there was really no word for them were usually referred to as brothers. Joseph was much older than Mary are may or may not have been able to sire further children.. whatever, prottys will say just about anything as long as it contradicts Catholic teaching. I don't see where this is that important a point anyway....one way or the other. When people make bad decisions they will do just about anything to justify that decision....usually doesn't work.

1,130 posted on 07/10/2016 8:59:16 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1120 | View Replies ]


To: terycarl; metmom; MHGinTN; knarf
Nope..she certainly may have had step children by Joseph's first marriage but cousins, because there was really no word for them were usually referred to as brothers

I disagree bro. I doubt Joseph had a previous marriage. I heard a rumor that Joseph was actually younger than Mary. 😆 You must have missed Metmom's post 1120. I understood it perfectly. It was very detailed, and accurate, very accurate, meaning the brothers and sisters of Jesus had the same mother. They were half brothers and sisters of Jesus.

prottys will say just about anything as long as it contradicts Catholic teaching. I don't see where this is that important a point anyway....one way or the other.

I disagree bro. All we need to do is rightly divide the word of truth, and it contradicts Catholic teaching. Rightly dividing the word of truth, means correctly interpreting the Bible. That's what we do, Interpret it correctly. 😀 You say it doesn't matter one way or the other. I disagree bro. It matters, because Joseph and Mary did the evil deed (sex) and therefore, Mary was not the ever virgin,that some people claim, and is not the demigoddess that some people claim. She was not sinless, as some people claim. That's why it's important. People can believe whatever their little hearts want, but they ARE responsible for whether they are right or wrong.
Remember, we don't want to do any weeping and gnashing of teeth.

1,133 posted on 07/11/2016 2:41:15 AM PDT by Mark17 (The love of God, how rich and pure, how measureless and strong. It shall forevermore endure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl
Joseph was much older than Mary...<{P>Oh?

And where is your EVIDENCE for this claim?

1,136 posted on 07/11/2016 4:44:56 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl
prottys will say just about anything as long as it contradicts Catholic teaching.

No, TC: we post SCRIPTURE that refutes Rome's claims.

1,137 posted on 07/11/2016 4:45:45 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies ]

To: terycarl
Nope..she certainly may have had step children by Joseph's first marriage

Of which there is no record in Scripture of Joseph being married before.

That's a fairy tale concocted by the Catholic church to explain that Mary had other children without her doing the dirty *s* word.

1,144 posted on 07/11/2016 5:33:05 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson