As a matter of fact, I believe you, Kasper and Marx to all be schismatics; not essentially, but actually. There is no such thing as "essentially" schismatic. You make stuff up.
How is Karl Marx, an unbaptized man of ancestrally Jewish religion, “schismatic”? He is simply a non-Catholic.
Sorry for being pedantic, but you seem to have a conversation about meaning of words.
“As a matter of fact, I believe you, Kasper and Marx to all be schismatics; not essentially, but actually.”
See, then once again we see you making a mistake with Catholic doctrine. Someone who actually understood what schism is would not say that about me.
“There is no such thing as “essentially” schismatic. You make stuff up.”
Nope. I simply used a term that has been used before to relate the conclusions of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts when it relied on Fr. Gerald Murray’s thesis in regard to the SSPX. You, being the supposed great traditionalist you always claim to be, should know that. It’s no surprise then, if you don’t.