“If you think that Leo XIII or the Church universal did not believe Anglicans were considered “heretics”, then again YOU must provide Church teaching that supports your belief.”
You keep making the same mistake over and over again - but at least you admitted what anyone with two eyes and the ability to read (and good will) would admit: Apostolicae Curae is not about condemning Anglican as heretics. Again, the question has to be asked: Why didn’t Leo XIII bother doing it as some people here keep insisting should be done?
“So far you have done nothing of the sort.”
Because that was never the issue in this thread and still isn’t. Also, you - as would befit a faux traditionalist as opposed to a real traditionalist mention nothing about the difference between formal and material heresy, nor do you bring up the culpability factor or how it might be viewed as mitigated in some circumstances. Simply put: Leo XIII knew what you apparently don’t about theology and judging these matters. Trust him.
“Don’t bother to reply until you have done so.”
I’ll reply as I like. And I did.
And you still haven’t proven that Leo XIII believed the Anglicans were not heretics. But you never do meet my challenges.