“All questions that you fail to address.”
Your questions don’t have anything to do with the original issue.
“Your silence speaks volumes.”
Mostly about how poorly thought out your questions are.
“You are ignoring Pope Leo XIII, it’s been the whole basis of your silly logic.”
I have mentioned him numerous times. I clearly can’t be ignoring him if I am the one who first mentioned him and have repeatedly mentioned him since. That is logical and irrefutable. You’ll demonstrate that yourself.
“I did not make up anything.”
Sure you did. Here’s an example: “You are ignoring Pope Leo XIII, it’s been the whole basis of your silly logic.”
If I am the one who first brought up Leo XIII and have mentioned a number of times since then, then I cannot be ignoring him. That is simple irrefutably true. There is no other way to look at it. Thus, you made that up.
“I’m asking you why you make it a point to differentiate Anglicans from Lutherans.”
Are Anglicans Lutherans or are they Anglicans? The very fact that you are using TWO DIFFERENT NAMES MEANS YOU ARE DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THEM on some level, right? If you can’t make proper distinctions, how on earth are you ever going to be able to discuss anything important?
“You continually refuse to answer that question. After all, we are talking about heretics.”
And again, I ask you, the very fact that you are using TWO DIFFERENT NAMES MEANS YOU ARE DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THEM on some level, right?
“P.S. Did you know Walter Cardinal Kasper, Francis’ favorite, is a heretic himself? Kasper has questioned the historicity of Christ’s Resurrection, ergo he is a heretic.”
Again, the kitchen sink. Whenever you really stick your foot into it you throw in Kasper like his name is some sort of face-saving talisman for you. Sorry, it doesn’t work.
“Heresy comes in all flavors, Vlad; some as “religions” and others in individuals. Try not to join the crowd.”
I never will. The issue remains, however. The Catholic Church calls Anglicans Anglicans and has done so for a long time. No teaching has changed. What needs to change is your apparent lack of knowledge about the Church’s teachings.
What part of this did you miss?
Once again, the Catholic Church has always considered all protestants to be heretics. What part of this do you not understand? Post 387
As far as Pope Leo XIII, why do you reference him. He declared Anglicans to be heretics. Yet, you claim they aren't.
Enjoy your cafeteria.
The only thing that is irrefutably true is that you ignore Pope Leo XIII and demand a double negative.
Popes Paul VI, JPII and Benedict XVI, each, either gave episcopal rings or pectoral crosses to heretical lay Anglicans, who had no valid priestly orders.
I'll go with Pope Leo XIII, I don't care who you'll side with. I never have. I'm Catholic.