Skip to comments.
POPE FRANCIS FOR YEAR OF MERCY GRANTS THAT SSPX PRIESTS CAN VALIDLY ABSOLVE!
WDTPRS ^
| September 1, 2015
| Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
Posted on 09/01/2015 3:53:50 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-429 last
To: piusv
Unless they're speaking of those terrible Trads who actually defend the Catholic Faith as it was always taught! HMMMmmm...
421
posted on
09/09/2015 4:16:45 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: ebb tide
“Only in his mind.”
No, I’m absolutely right: It’s just a fact that I never once claimed that Pope Leo XIII didn’t believe they were heretics.
422
posted on
09/09/2015 4:18:03 AM PDT
by
vladimir998
(Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: ebb tide
“Yet some on this forum, claim today’s Anglicans are not the heretics that former popes declared them to be.”
Who EXACTLY has said that ebb tide? You repeatedly make things up. Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin?
423
posted on
09/09/2015 4:21:05 AM PDT
by
vladimir998
(Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: piusv
“It conflicts with the new Vatican II ecclesiology!”
So Pope Leo XIII was pope at Vatican II? That’s even more bizarre than believing Pope Leo X lived when there were Anglicans.
424
posted on
09/09/2015 4:24:36 AM PDT
by
vladimir998
(Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: piusv
You’re so right. He’s so confused, it’s pitiful.
425
posted on
09/09/2015 4:27:19 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
LOL. I know. Where he got that I said that Pope Leo XIII was at Vatican II I’ll never know.
426
posted on
09/09/2015 4:51:28 PM PDT
by
piusv
To: piusv
See his Post 238. He appears to have severe memory defenciencies:
Their ancestors were schismatics and heretics. Present day Anglicans are not called such.
Compare to his Post 423
[ebb tide]“Yet some on this forum, claim today’s Anglicans are not the heretics that former popes declared them to be.”
Who EXACTLY has said that ebb tide? You repeatedly make things up. Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin?
427
posted on
09/09/2015 7:16:58 PM PDT
by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin? Indeed.
428
posted on
09/10/2015 6:19:10 AM PDT
by
piusv
To: NYer
Interesting — had missed this until now (not that I sit on the edge of my chair waiting for the pope to say one thing or another about SSPX). God might view them as having had faculty all along. I’m skeptical the pope can turn things on and off like that.
429
posted on
01/19/2016 6:55:50 PM PST
by
steve86
(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OMorgair (Latin form: Malachy))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420, 421-429 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson