Then you'd better post the TRUTH; or else our lurkers here will not be able to discern.
How is that a lie??
jobim: That statement is a lie. It's a sin for a Christian to tell a lie.
It's not a lie. There are plenty of former RC's who will tell you that that's what they did.
And I'm one of them. When I was a Catholic, that was my identity. I followed Catholicism, thinking that was the way to get to heaven and non-Catholics were going to hell, because that's what I was taught.
That statement is a lie. It's a sin for a Christian to tell a lie.
Indeed the latter is true, but the burden is upon you as the accuser to establish that it is. Saying they follow God is meaningless, as to do so presumes He has made His will known, and what RCs follow as that source is the issue. Either RCs follow Scripture of another source first, or they follow what their church says first.
According to papal teaching, is the one duty for Catholics to follow the RC pastors as docile sheep?
Should Church law be held as the supreme Law?
Can one assuredly know what Scripture and tradition consist of and mean apart from faith that the instruments and stewards of Divine revelation is the trustworthy authoritative source on that?
What is the basis for RC assurance that Catholic teaching is correct: that of the degree of evidential warrant or the premise of ensured magisterial veracity?