Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for a Mass Conversion of Men
The Catholic World Report ^ | 04/06/15 | Matthew James Christoff

Posted on 04/07/2015 3:13:37 PM PDT by Legatus

Despite the fact the New Evangelization has been an ongoing emphasis by the Catholic Church for over forty years, it has failed to stem the disastrous losses of the faithful in the U.S. Since 2000, 14 million Catholics have left the faith, parish religious education participation of children has dropped by 24%, Catholic school attendance has dropped by 19%, baptisms of infants has dropped by 28%, baptism of adults has dropped by 31% and sacramental Catholic marriages have dropped by 41%. Something is desperately wrong with the Church’s approach to the New Evangelization.

Of Mass and Men

One reason the New Evangelization is faltering is because it is missing men. The New Emangelization Project has documented the serious Catholic “man-crisis” in the United States. 1 in 3 baptized Catholic men have left the faith and of those who remain, 50-60% of them are “Casual Catholics”, men who don’t know and don’t practice the faith. Of those who practice the faith, many are lukewarm, not converted to the point of conviction, a conviction in which they are prepared to make disciples for Christ and His Catholic Church. The New Evangelization has largely ignored men, with no substantial or sustained efforts to directly confront the Catholic “man-crisis”.

The Catholic “man-crisis” matters. The souls of men matter and many are being lost; for example, two thirds of Christian men are looking at porn at least monthly and the numbers are much higher for younger men. The faith of the children matter and huge numbers of young people are leaving the faith because they have followed their fathers out of the Church. Without a New Emangelization in which millions of Catholic men become newly committed to Christ and His Church, there can be no New Evangelization.

While a complex set of forces have driven the Catholic “man-crisis”, including both massive cultural changes outside the Church and serious missteps within the Church, the lack of engagement of men in the Mass is a major contributing factor: men don’t understand the Mass and well-meaning, but misinformed priests in many parishes have de-sacralized the Mass causing many men to simply “drift away.”

Why is the Mass a key driver of the Catholic “man-crisis”? Research shows that almost 9 out of 10 Catholic men don’t participate in a Catholic activity outside of attending Mass; if men aren’t being reached in the Mass, they aren’t being reached. Only about 1/3 of Catholic men are attending Mass on a weekly basis. Only 1 in 50 Catholic men have a monthly practice of Confession, underscoring the fact that many are attending Mass without a proper preparation to receive the Eucharist. 48% of Catholic men are “bored” in the Mass and 55% of Catholic men don’t feel they “get anything out of the Mass.” These statistics confirm what dozens of the New Emangelization Project interviews with top Catholic men’s evangelists know: men don’t understand the Mass. No man can truly understand the Mass and be bored.

A Mass Conversion of Men is Needed

The word “conversion” comes from the Latin convertere, meaning to “turn around” and is related to the Greek word, metanoia, meaning “change of mind” (translated as “repentance” in the New Testament). Catholic men are in serious need of conversion.

A Mass Conversion of Men is needed. Millions of men (masses of men) need to have a conversion (change of mind/repentance) about the Sacrament of the Eucharist (the Mass). When there is a Mass Conversion of Men, a dramatic regeneration of the Church will occur. Men will approach the Mass with a new Grace-hungry mindset that recognizes Christ’s miraculous gift of the Eucharist and their desperate need for it. Men will begin to experience a conversion of heart and sacramentally prepare themselves for meeting Christ by going first to Confession. Men will have a deep understanding of the parts of the Mass and the profound significance of the words and gestures that are made during the Mass. Men will begin to accept a growing fullness of Grace available in the Eucharist and they will increasingly aspire to sainthood. Men will pass along their newfound reverence for Eucharist to their children through their awe, regular acceptance of the Eucharist and fervor to catechize their children.

A man-specific approach is needed. Rather than a gender-neutral catechetical approach, men will be renewed when men are gathered together by their priests and the Mass is presented to them in a masculine way. For example, the Church has a long history of speaking of the Church Militant and spiritual combat; if men have a renewed sense of the life and death spiritual battle, they will see their desperate need for the Mass. Men need to be challenged to fulfill their duty to lead their wives and children to Christ in the Mass. Rather than approaching the Mass as entertainment or self-gratification, men can be convinced about leaving the battlefield to gather with other men to give thanks and get guidance from the Eternal King. Men can recall the powerful men whose words are spoken in the Mass (e.g. John the Baptist, the Centurion, etc.). Men can reconnect with the powerful and manly history in the Liturgy of the Word. Men can be re-taught about the heroic and bloody sacrifice of Christ and the fearsome power of the miraculous transubstantiation of the bread and wine. The Mass is full of powerful elements that can resonate within a man’s heart.

Cardinal Burke and others have spoken about the de-sacralization of the Mass that has occurred in many places; this includes Masses which are priest-focused and not Christ-focused, the horizontal nature of “community” is over-emphasized while the vertical nature of the Divine Presence is de-emphasized, music which is syrupy and sentimental, a general lack of awe for the Eucharist by the priest and lay helpers, parish cultures which accept “going to the grocery store” attire and grabbing the Eucharist like a potato chip, a feminization of the Mass due to an over-representation of women and altar girls in the sanctuary, etc.

Priests are men and large numbers of priests need to have a “conversion” about the Mass. When the Mass becomes “casual”, men become casual about the Mass. The recent New Emangelization Project Helping Priests Become More Effective in Evangelizing Men Survey demonstrates that men hunger and are moved by the Mass when priests offer the Mass with reverence. Many priests need to be re-evangelized about how to infuse the Mass with greater awe and reverence and about the need to specifically evangelize and catechize men about the Mass.

Bishops and Priests need to lead the Mass Conversion of Men

The Mass Conversion of Men will require a sustained large-scale evangelization and catechesis of men about the Mass and a great movement of the Holy Spirit. This will be a major effort, but not a complex one. The Sacrament of the Eucharist is the “source and summit of Christian life” in which the Savior gives men the bread of life. The Mass has transformed the lives of men since the Last Supper and will always transform the lives of men. The Mass is the central focus of daily life in every parish and not an extraneous “evangelization program.” There is no greater diocese or parish priority than to ensure men can engage in the Mass. Now is the time for bishops and priests to ensure that every single man can access the eternal graces of the Eucharist.

After forty years, the New Evangelization has so far failed to reverse the growing losses of Catholics in the West. Rather than a continued parade of programs and events, the Church needs to get back to the basics; the Mass and men. When there is a Mass Conversion of Men in which millions of men and priests are evangelized and catechized to the point of conversion in the Mass, the Church will be renewed and the promise of the New Evangelization will be fulfilled.


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Tax-chick
It is easy to say that it is just this day and age but it is not.

Win, place and show. People of my parents' age and older consistently say their fathers didn't attend church regularly, didn't seem concerned about religion or their eternal destiny. (My own grandfather, an old Orangeman, worked the night shift on the railroad and spent the days drinking in the basement with his cat.)

I haven't heard anything like that firsthand about someone's father (or husband, or someone like that), but I've read some similar things in a relatively recent piece. The part in question discussed tendencies in the United States roughly around the time of what seems to be Your Parents' Age and Older.

Forgive me for my vague memory, but the topic of this part was at least about regular church attendance, if not also about men's concerns about "religion or their eternal destiny." The discussions quoted from that earlier time might have been more specifically about concerns about the effects of a man's non-attendance and non-observance on the rest of his family. The piece may have also mentioned specific measures that were intended to counteract this tendency, but here my memory is especially vague.

I've also tried looking online for more specifics, with little success, but I did find this:

Setting the Record Straight – Mass Attendance Has Dropped, But Not as Much as We May Think. Reflections on a Recent CARA Report

We usually think of the 1950s as an era when just about everyone went to Church. But the cover from the 1959 Saturday Evening Post at the right indicates that even at that time there were already trends underway that indicated not all was perfect in paradise. It is a long and unfortunate trend that men have often left the spiritual upbringing of the Church to their wives and stayed home on Sundays.

41 posted on 04/07/2015 6:27:09 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

The increase in crime was engineered. The USHA pursued a policy of bringing Southern blacks into the ethnic neighborhoods, while the FHA pursued a policy of keeping blacks out of the suburbs. This was a carrot-and-stick policy to drive the ethnic Catholics out of their old neighborhoods out into the suburbs.


42 posted on 04/07/2015 6:44:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; Lonely Bull
I forgot to mention more specifics: "the cover from the 1959 Saturday Evening Post at the right" is titled "Sunday Morning" and depicts a family.

In the background, the mother, two girls, and a boy (who may be noticing his father) are dressed in their finery and are holding little dark-colored books. Presuambly they are heading off to church, with the door somewhere off stage right. In the foreground, the father is slouching in his chair; he is still in his bedclothes and is holding a newspaper and a cigarette (oh, no, how horrible, a cigarette!).

This piece also links to another piece elsewhere: "Sunday Morning: Deconstructing Catholic Mass attendance in the 1950s and now." It's a source for that cover. Among other things, it gives more information and talks about some parts of the apparent spiritual life of Norman Rockwell.

43 posted on 04/07/2015 6:46:15 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Cardinal O’Connell of Boston was in the closet. As was his successor, Cardinal Cushing, and his succressor Cardinal Medeiros. That covers from ca. 1900 into the 1980’s! Don’t know whether Law is/was gay, but his coddling of perverts of all kinds is certainly suggestive. O’Malley is extremely gay-friendly—with gay-friendly parishes, gay Masses, etc. So that’s about 115 years of non-stop gay or gay-friendly Cardinal Archbishops.

In New York, Spellman was gay. O’Connor did not lift a pinky to clean up the gay priests’ network. Dolan is, of course, gay-friendly.

Washington has Donna Wuerl, and the last really courageous archbishop of Washington as Patrick A. Cardinal O’Boyle—who was the only bishop in the U.S. who suspended dissenters from Humanae Vitae.


44 posted on 04/07/2015 6:51:08 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
Pork is okay, divorce a necessary evil. Man has incrementally left God's word. Even offering to forgive man's sin has failed as it was destined to do so; a man must be personally responsible to God.

I wonder how Judaism is faring without all the extra help Christians get - if they are doing better then it is possible that not holding man accountable is what is doing the damage.

Then there is the issue of that other prophet Mohammed who is creating a revulsion towards any God, as are the demands of the Gay community who have their own churches - MAN is the problem.

45 posted on 04/07/2015 7:46:34 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
In New York, Spellman was gay.

My father was an altar boy at St. Patrick's Cathedral in the 1940s as his parish, St. John the Evangelist, had the privilege to send servers to the cathedral.

He explained to me he was actually an altar boy at one of the side altars, Holy Family, I think. It's since been removed and replaced by something else, much like his parish church, removed and replaced by an office building.

On holy days when the cardinal offered mass, he performed the role of sanctuary boy, along with a lot of other boys, to add to the solemnity of the occasion. I once asked him what it was like. He made a face and said, "they had their favorites." Apparently, a shiny dime went to the boy who hit all his marks. He said it seemed like the same 3 or so boys always won the prize. I was pretty young when he told me this but I figured out what was going on.

46 posted on 04/07/2015 7:56:49 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Again, I keep hearing claims that Michaelangelo was gay. No evidence. Abraham Lincoln was gay (no real evidence). Alexander Hamilton. Thomas Jefferson. On, and on and on.

Unless there’s REAL evidence I see no reason to assume any of those rumors are true.


47 posted on 04/07/2015 8:08:36 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Legatus
...I'll try to be brief. I believe the "collapse" started when Rome changed the rites surrounding the Sacraments. People had been led along believing that the Church never changes and then almost overnight everything was changed. Then (and this is where I put on my tin foil hat) homosexuals infiltrated the clergy in massive numbers and basically just destroyed everything from within.

That's a perception that I had not considered before. I'll have to mull this over for awhile!

48 posted on 04/07/2015 8:29:31 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Michelangelo was definitely very pious and prayerful, and lived chastely. I’m not sure there is “no” evidence he had SSA.


49 posted on 04/07/2015 8:38:25 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
That's a perception that I had not considered before. I'll have to mull this over for awhile!

Twenty years ago when I was "investigating" Catholicism there were "lots" of elderly people who told me something similar to "they said the Church was never changing then they changed everything", some were still practicing but most had long since stopped. That lost generation is mostly gone now...

50 posted on 04/08/2015 2:27:41 AM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Bull

Thanks for the information. People “my parents’ age and older” are in their 70s and up. The people I know are very active in our church, so it surprised me to learn that so many of their fathers were non-practicing Christians.


51 posted on 04/08/2015 3:31:11 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Be afraid only of thoughtlessness and pusillanimity." ~ Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Thank you, vladimir.


52 posted on 04/08/2015 4:52:14 AM PDT by asyouwish (Philippians 4:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

The Curcillo movement was created after WW2 to bring men back into the Roman Catholic church in Spain and it spread to become Via de Cristo for Lutherans, Walk to Emmaus for Methodists, and Presbyterian Pilgrimage for Calvinists.


ACTS is the Catholic outgrowth from the Curcillo movement. ACTS is an acronym for Adoration, Community, Theology, and Service, and is patterned after the description of the early Church in the Acts of the Apostles (ACTS 2:42-47).

ACTS started in a suburb of San Antonio, TX, in 1987, and has spread to many parishes all over Texas. In 2002, the ACTS Mission Board brought ACTS to two parishes in St. Louis County, MO, where it has spread to several other parishes in the area as well as in Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio.

More information on ACTS Missions retreats can be found here: http://www.actsmissions.org/2013-03-06-20-32-25/history-of-acts


53 posted on 04/08/2015 12:59:19 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
with the support of Cardinal Cushing (who was gay,

I never heard a whisper of that; I did hear that once in addressing a gathering of priests he said, "If you have to break your vows, at least do it with a woman!"

54 posted on 04/08/2015 1:10:01 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Thanks for sharing that. It looks like they just updated Curcillo to create ACTS. I like that becuase Via de Cristo needs a similar makeover, but the old guard are resisting change and by the time they all die, no one will be left to reboot it. I’ll show them ACTS and explain that if the RCC can handle the change, so can we.


55 posted on 04/08/2015 1:23:11 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Well, it’s true.

The bishops need to know that their personal sins are no longer off-limits. Concealing corruption does not “prevent scandal” and it does not “promote the good of the Church.”

Someday, we will have a Pope who, when a appointing bishops, will ask: Is this man a sodomite? Is this man a Catholic? We haven’t had such a Pope for a long time, and we don’t have one now.


56 posted on 04/08/2015 2:05:59 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: Biggirl

Yeah, because I spell stuff wrong in every post.

And use words incorrectly.

like an imbecile.

In a special way.


59 posted on 04/08/2015 3:14:01 PM PDT by humblegunner (Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

LOL!


60 posted on 04/08/2015 3:15:12 PM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson