Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
Intellectual laziness has nothing to do with it, unless it's on the part of someone posting things without attribution. That's what seems lazy to me. Attribution is a simple way of making it easy for the reader to actually see the source of a point and therefore determine the viability of the point straight away.

If I state a fact - and I know it is a fact - and I just checked this fact on the internet this morning using google, then I expect the average lazy anti-Catholic can rouse himself from his intellectual laziness and use google just as easily as I did.

Really. You state a fact. Okay. Well, what terms did you use to search for in Google? What didn't you exclude or include? How is he "average lazy anti-catholic" supposed to do if he doesn't know WHAT you searched for of HOW you searched for it? I suppose we lazy anti-catholics are going to have to learn to read your mind so that we can then go out, and satisfy you by searching for the "facts" on Google.

You see, if you attribute the source, one can see that the fact is actually, a fact.

Or not.

Until mind reading becomes a commonplace event, it's going to be mighty hard to satisfy your request. But, If you want to actually appear to be using trustworthy "facts," it's up to you to provide it to us lazy anti-cathoics. Otherwise, we could just assume your "facts" are made up from whole cloth.

Hoss

512 posted on 03/28/2015 11:14:03 AM PDT by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]


To: HossB86; Lera

“Intellectual laziness has nothing to do with it, unless it’s on the part of someone posting things without attribution.”

You can always do a little work or not. The choice is yours.

“Well, what terms did you use to search for in Google?”

Find it on your own. It’s G-O-O-G-L-E. How hard can it be?

“What didn’t you exclude or include?”

I included exactly what was necessary and what I knew would work from previous finds. I excluded everything else.

“How is he “average lazy anti-catholic” supposed to do if he doesn’t know WHAT you searched for of HOW you searched for it?”

It’s google. There’s effectively one way to search - you put words in the search box. Does that give you any ideas of how to do this ‘cause I am most certainly not going to help you do it. If I can do it - and I did this morning - than you can too. It’s just that simple.

“I suppose we lazy anti-catholics are going to have to learn to read your mind so that we can then go out, and satisfy you by searching for the “facts” on Google.”

You don’t have to satisfy me. This is all about satisfying you isn’t it? I didn’t post any links so you’re not satisfied, right? I hope you enjoy that lack of satisfaction because you’re only going to get more of it at this rate.

“You see, if you attribute the source, one can see that the fact is actually, a fact.”

Since I KNOW it is a fact I don’t have to “satisfy” you to have validation that it is a fact. I know it is a fact because I have already seen that it is factual. This sort of thing where a Protestant anti-Catholic makes a statement about something he apparently knows nothing about and then starts running in circles when evidence is posted happens all the time. Example on a related topic: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3044370/posts

I have seen that SO MANY TIMES that now I often simply refuse to do the work the Protestant anti-Catholic should be willing to do themselves.

“Until mind reading becomes a commonplace event, it’s going to be mighty hard to satisfy your request.”

No, it isn’t. You see google is easy to use. If you want to do the research, do it. If you don’t want to, then don’t.

“But, If you want to actually appear to be using trustworthy “facts,” it’s up to you to provide it to us lazy anti-cathoics.”

No. I know what I posted is absolutely correct. Whether or not you consider it to be “trustworthy” is completely irrelevant to me since I don’t believe you are remotely interested in the truth in the first place. Again, look at the thread I posted a link to. I posted evidence. It was irrefutable. Did it matter? Did it matter in the least? No. Anti-Catholics DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.

“Otherwise, we could just assume your “facts” are made up from whole cloth.”

I think the anti-Catholic should just go ahead and assume that. After all he would be wrong, but at least if someone does that he won’t feel any need to be intellectually and morally dishonest on top of it by pretending evidence given him was never actually given him, right? So the anti-Catholic should just go ahead and assume whatever he wants since that is how it always goes anyway no matter how much evidence is posted anyway. The truth doesn’t matter to anti-Catholics. They prove it here every day.


524 posted on 03/28/2015 1:49:25 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies ]

To: HossB86
I seem to recall a few FRoman Catholics on these threads who will INSIST that a source not only be cited BUT linked as well for any kind of statement that we make. They flat out refuse to read a word unless their demand is met. Funny how duplicitous some are, isn't it?
593 posted on 03/29/2015 8:19:47 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson