Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981

you quoted it wrong
you said holy catholic apostolic church

The article said, “the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.”

Quite a difference, I am surprised you didnt pick up on that...


48 posted on 03/08/2015 6:10:32 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon
you quoted it wrong you said holy catholic apostolic church

The article said, “the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.”

Quite a difference, I am surprised you didnt pick up on that...

False, I quoted it, or you, correctly, in italics and then commented on it, sans italics, with my perception of the weak link in his, or your, line of argment. You must believe in a 1500 (or perhaps 2000) conspiracy theory against the holy catholic apostolic church, that they destroyed your true history, at the same time you believe they preserved and delivered the holy scriptures to you without corruption, which is cognitive dissonance.

From my post 35, bolded for emphasis in case your eyes are weak.

Therefore, the “church fathers” are actually the fathers of the Roman Catholic Church. They are the men who laid the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.

And thus your witness confirms, unwittingly, the holy catholic apostolic church. The argument that said church engaged in a 1500 year conspiracy to destroy true history but shepherded and transmitted the holy scriptures is cognitive dissonance and thereby rejected.

49 posted on 03/08/2015 6:28:31 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
you quoted it wrong you said holy catholic apostolic church

The article said, “the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.”

Quite a difference, I am surprised you didnt pick up on that...

False, I quoted it, or you, correctly, in italics and then commented on it, sans italics, with my perception of the weak link in his, or your, line of argment. You must believe in a 1500 (or perhaps 2000) conspiracy theory against the holy catholic apostolic church, that they destroyed your true history, at the same time you believe they preserved and delivered the holy scriptures to you without corruption, which is cognitive dissonance.

From my post 35, bolded for emphasis in case your eyes are weak.

Therefore, the “church fathers” are actually the fathers of the Roman Catholic Church. They are the men who laid the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.

And thus your witness confirms, unwittingly, the holy catholic apostolic church. The argument that said church engaged in a 1500 year conspiracy to destroy true history but shepherded and transmitted the holy scriptures is cognitive dissonance and thereby rejected.

50 posted on 03/08/2015 6:28:31 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson