Posted on 03/01/2015 4:54:44 PM PST by NKP_Vet
In one small area.
Like your first pope?
Get thee behind me; SATAN...
Hebrews 9:27 And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment,
And your quote IN CONTEXT says the exact opposite of what you claim.
John 5:21-31 For as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will. The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him. Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.“Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man. Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment. “I can do nothing on my own. As I hear, I judge, and my judgment is just, because I seek not my own will but the will of him who sent me. If I alone bear witness about myself, my testimony is not true.
Death and time and judgement, try and stick with the topic.
Are you going to admit now that YOU posted James R. Whites Definition of Sola Scriptura?
Your religion demands submission to the pope for salvation.
There's these guys.....
Top 10 Most Wicked Popes
http://listverse.com/2007/08/17/top-10-most-wicked-popes/
1. Liberius, reigned 352-66 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
2. Honorius I, reigned 625-638 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
3. Stephen VI, reigned 896-89 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
4. John XII, reigned 955-964 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
5. Benedict IX, reigned 1032-1048 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
6. Boniface VIII, reigned 1294-1303 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
7. Urban VI, reigned 1378-1389 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
8. Alexander VI, reigned 1492-1503 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
9. Leo X, reigned 1513-1521 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
10. Clement VII, reigned 1523-1524 [Catholic Encyclopaedia]
Top 10 Worst Popes in History
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-worst-popes-in-history.php
1. Pope Alexander VI (1431 – 1503)
2. Pope John XII (c. 937 – 964)
3. Pope Benedict IX (c. 1012 – 1065/85)
4. Pope Sergius III (? – 911)
5. Pope Stephen VI (? – 897)
6. Pope Julius III (1487 – 1555)
7. Pope Urban II (ca. 1035 – 1099)
8. Pope Clement VI (1291 – 1352)
9. Pope Leo X (1475 – 1521)
10. Pope Boniface VIII (c. 1235 – 1303)
LDS - Luther Derangement Syndrome.
The thought of him just pushes RC’s right over the edge.
Show us when he claimed Luther was the father of Protestantism.
Sorry...History disagree’s with you.
Catholic revisionist history, that simply cannot fathom not following a man.
But not real history.
Who cares if he asks to be baptized?
Baptism doesn’t save anyone.
Unless he repented and turned to Christ, no he would not go to heaven.
It was posted by another FReeper and it was a concise summary of SS.
And I didn’t pay attention to who put it out because it doesn’t matter.
And it’s not a matter of *trusting* the guy enough to *use* his definition. The definition works regardless of who posted it.
It's only the Catholic Church that agrees they serve the same god as the Muslims. The rest of us realize it's not the same God at all.
Hey, He used Judas and the Catholic Church also right? So why not Luther?
2) Who gave James the authority to promulgate this definition?
3) Why is his definition more valid than anyone elses?
You ran from answering these questions before, let's see how you handle it now.
Isnt it obvious?
If you are so smart...why cant you figure that one out?
I thought I explained WHY.
I guess you failed to accept that.
Which faith might that be?
I can't tell from the comments I've responded to.
I replied at 185 - only these two of your posts were in the thread by that time.
Yeah it’s screams of bigotry....like using the term “you people”
You clearly used it as a derogitive.
Judging from the responces in this thread...being “born again” also comes with a license to mock, trash, and insult others....
Oh sorry...I didnt know there was a minimum age limit for being reborn in water through Christ...
I must have missed that one in the manual...
I’m still wondering why protestants waited 1500 years after the death of christ to show up...
Before Luther...there was no such thing as a protestant.
And if protestants believe only in the written word....doesnt that include the 39 books of the old testiment as well?
Like Leviticus?
““If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.”
...or do you pick and choose what written words to follow?
This is funny; considering the source.
And it PRODUCES only the VERY BEST leaders; too!
Catch any?
I just LOVE it when the selective use of Scripture appears!
“Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will judge the world?... And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?... Do you not know that we shall judge angels?... How much more, things that pertain to this life?.. If then you have judgments concerning things pertaining to this life, do you appoint those who are least esteemed by the church to judge ? (1 Corinthians 6:1-5).
Many commands of God require the exercise of righteous judgment.
“But we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw from every brother who walks disorderly and not according to the tradition which he received from us” (2 Thessalonians 3:6).
“And if anyone does not obey our word in this epistle, note that person and do not keep company with him, that he may be ashamed. Yet do not count him as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother” (2 Thessalonians 3:14,15).
“Teach and exhort these things. If anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wrangling of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. From such withdraw yourself” (2 Timothy 6:2b-5).
“Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them. For those who are such do not serve our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly, and by smooth words and flattering speech deceive the hearts of the simple” (Romans 16:17,18).
All these commands require the careful exercise of righteousness judgment. Do not be deceived by smooth words and flattering speech. Beware of wolves who come to you with a sheep’s skin.
We must be careful not to make unqualified judgments. But we must judge appropriately when commanded to do so.
“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” (John 7:24).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.