If one wishes to peruse the full writings of various bishops, scholars, apologists, etcetera (from the 2nd century A.D. on), a great resource is "Early Christian Writings, Early Church Fathers" [link below].
Listed are : Church Fathers: Didache, down to Church Fathers Justin Martyr, Claudius Appollinaris, Irenaeus of Lyons, Theophilus of Antioch, Polycrates of Ephesus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Serapion of Antioch, Hippolytus of Rome, Origen, and many, many others (30 plus in all).
Early Christian Writings, Early Church Fathers:
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/churchfathers.html
I asked this question to a holy roller guy I used to work with. He told me the date of 25 December was originally a pagan holiday, and the assignation of the Christmas holiday to this date was actually the result of a political compromise by a king of England. I have no reason to disbelieve him!
Christmas = Winter Solstice
Easter = Spring Equinox
The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1787. What if we were discussing the real meaning of the any of the Amendments (say, the Second) and could only go back to what a scholar said in 1987 about its true meaning, how reliable would that opinion likely be?
Do we trust the opinion of say, Justice Ginsburg to be completely honest about the meaning of the Second Amendment? Well of course it would be foolish to. Yet, instead of searching the Scriptures about the true, accurate and harmonious facts about the birth of Our Savior, no, we are happy to base a pivotal holiday of the Christian holidays upon this tissue of historical noise: “Finally, in about 200 C.E., a Christian teacher in Egypt makes reference to the date Jesus was born.”
But it gets worse, far worse. In this Post-Christian society. We have seen a tech mob ride Mozilla CEO Brenden Eich out of a job because they found out that he believes that marriage should only be between one man and one woman. I see in other news that techies almost relish the vast holiday parties that Google throws. Apple CEO Tim Cook, who is gay, was widely quoted as anticipating an “iPad Christmas”.
By his actions, Tim Cook acknowledges that Jesus is important to his employees and to him personally. Otherwise, why would he cheer selling a lot of iPads for the holiday that celebrates His birth? Obviously a lot of techies have no problem with how Google observes Christmas.
But if a person wants to actually study the words of Jesus, and shapes his thinking and actions based on those words, how should he react when Jesus clearly speaks to the topic of sexual morality? (Like in Revelation 22:15?) How should he react when he knows that God could not bless anyone with a gift of a behavior that He declares to be detestable? How should he react knowing that should he make his opinion public that he could suffer the same fate and public humiliation as Brenden Eich did?
If advocates of same sex marriage want to be consistent, they must now repudiate Jesus and anything associated with Him including Christmas. Are these people proud enough of being gay and or supporting equal rights for gays that they are willing to stop observing Christmas? Or will they just re-imagine Christmas to suit their agenda? What does that make them?
If a society that violates many of the core values of Jesus can still observe a day that is dedicated to His birth, what does that say about their values? What does that say about the holiday?
The brutal answer is: the holiday is as corrupted as they all are. Jesus was not born on any day near December 25. There is not a single passage in God’s word that commands that anyone observe the day of His birth, while there are many that command observing His Teachings, which include commands to live a life of morality, including sexual morality. Jesus said (dare I quote Him?) it was God’s intent from the beginning of humanity that marriage was ONLY to be between one man and one woman. He also lamented that many people call Him Lord yet do not obey Him.
And He said that people who insist on adding to His word or taking away from what He said, would be cursed. And clearly we are now very cursed. The fruits of the way that society relates to Jesus and His teachings show how corrupted we have become. The truth about Jesus does indeed set people free, if only they were willing to read His Word as closely as they read their friend’s Facebook postings.
Luke 2 provides several clues. Not Winter, sheep are not in the field for Winter at 35 North. Zechariah is the order of Abijah. Not wasted information. We learned that King David assigned orders for priestly service. Now we can determine when John was born, and 6 months later, Jesus. Not December...
LFC,
Do you care or just like stirring the pot?
I can’t answer for why the ancient church selected Dec 25th over any other day, and any attempt to change it at this late date seems to me to be immaterial.
What the church has always believe is that Jesus was born, and that is what is being celebrated. I know many people who celebrate their “birthday” on a different day then when they were born.
I think you should look at the larger issue of obeying the teaching of Jesus and the NT writers, and less on the trivia of the Christian faith.
Grace and Peace,
K51
At least we know WHERE He was born.
Unlike a certain modern day leader.
Tertullian gives the date as Dec. 25 actually. The passage is disputed as an interpolation, but it's there.
Moreover, even if it is an interpolation, Tertullian also gives the Annunciation as March 25, from which Christ's birthday on Dec. 25 nine months later is inferred.
And the evidence from Tertullian harmonizes well with Chrysostom's claim in the 4th century as he was trying to get the feast spread in the East, that the Roman Church celebrated it on the 25th from time immemorial. He even claims the date was found in the census records, at Rome.
Does it even matter at this point? Christmas has moved from Jesus and into “Good will to all mankind.” For the most part, Christmas is a celebration anyone can participate celebrating and, outside of some acts of greed, it is a holiday that I think Jesus would appreciate. It is the one holiday where giving versus receiving is the focus, where happiness and joy are integral to its meaning. Many do celebrate Jesus at Christmas. The Catholic mass is an amazing celebration in many churches. Protestants of all denominations make a huge celebration as well. I don’t think Jesus would disapprove.
The theory that makes the most sense to me has to do with marketing.
The pagans held one of their biggest feasts of the year on the Winter Solstice, the shortest day of the year. This maked the end of the year and the start of the new one.
Not to be outdone, Christians held THEIR biggest feast right after the pagan feast ended.
Which feast would prospective converts remember? The last one they attended, most likely. And Christianity prospered. Simple.
On our modern Gregorian calendar, which did NOT exist at the time of Christ Jesus’ birth, He was born on October 4, 4BC.
Born, sometime overnight, on 15 Tishri, 3758 on the Hebrew’s calendar. See:http://antipas.net/heb_cal_3758.htm
I've long suspected that Jesus was born in the spring. Doesn't really matter particularly to me when we celebrate the event. We ought to do it every day.
A.M. = Anno Mundi; that is to say, in the year of the world.
PARALLEL DATINGS OF THE TIMES OF OUR LORD.
DATES OF "THE BEGETTING" (he gennesis, Matthew 1:18,20 (see Revised Version marg.). John 1:14-) OF OUR LORD AND HIS BIRTH. (Luke 2:7. John 1:-14.)
"THE COURSE OF ABIA" (Luke 1:5). This was the eighth of the priestly courses of ministration in the Temple (1 Chronicles 24:10), and occurred, as did the others, twice in the year. The "Courses"were changed every week, beginning each with a Sabbath. The reckoning commenced on the 22nd day of Tisri or Ethanim (Appendix 51. 5). This was the eighth and last day of the Feast of Tabernacles = the "Great Day of the Feast" (John 7:37), and was a Sabbath (Leviticus 23:39). The first course fell by lot to Jehoiarib, and the eighth to Abia or Abijah (1 Chronicles 24:10). Bearing in mind that all the courses served together at the three Great Feasts, the dates for the two yearly "ministrations" of Abiah will be seen to fall as follows: The first 9 ministration was from 12-18 Chisleu = December 6-12. The second ministration was from 12-18 Sivan = June 13-19. The announcement therefore to Zacharias in the Temple as to the conception of John the Baptist took place between 12-18 SIVAN (June 13-19), in the year 5 B.C. After finishing his "ministration", the aged priest "departed to his own house" (Luke 1:23), which was in a city10 in "the hill country" of Juda (verse 39). The day following the end of the "Course of Abia" being a Sabbath (Sivan 19), he would not be able to leave Jerusalem before the 20th. The thirty miles journey would probably occupy, for an old man, a couple of days at least. He would therefore arrive at his house on the 21st or 22nd. This leaves ample time for the miraculous "conception" of Elizabeth to take place on or about 23rd of SIVAN 11 - which would correspond to June 23-24 of that year. The fact of the conception and its date would necessarily be known at the time and afterwards, and hence the 23rd SIVAN would henceforth be associated with the conception of John Baptist as the 1st TEBETH would be with that of our Lord. But the same influences that speedily obscured and presently obliterated the real dates of our Lord's "Begetting" and Birth, were also at work with regard to those of the Forerunner, and with the same results. As soon as the true Birth day of Christ had been shifted from its proper date, videlicet: the 15th of Tisri (September 29), and a Festival Day from the Pagan Calendars substituted for it (videlicet: December 25), then everything else had to be altered too. Hence "Lady Day" in association with March 25 (new style) became necessarily connected with the Annunciation. And June 24 made its appearance, as it still is in our Calendar, as the date of "the Nativity of John the Baptist", instead of, as it really is, the date of his miraculous conception. The Four "Quarter Days" may therefore be set forth thus: first in the chronological order of the events with which they are associated, videlicet:
or, placing the two sets together naturally:-
1 ZUMPT fixes Quirinus' (Cyrenius') First Governorship as 4 B.C. to 1 B.C. Justin Martyr thrice says that our Lord was born under Quirinus (Apol. 1. XXXIV, page 37; XLVI, page 46; Dial. LXXVIII, page 195. Clarks edition). 2 According to some, Augustus died August 19, A.D. 14. Therefore if Tiberius' co-regnancy was for two years before Augustus' death his first year was 765 A.U.C. = 12 A.D.. His fifteenth year consequently was A.U.C. 779 = 26 A.D. = 4030 A.M. and A.C. 30, for our Lord was thirty years of age when He begun His Ministry (Luke 3:23). Clement of Alexandria gives the years of Augustus' reign as being 43-46, according to different reckonings in his day. 3 According to Clement of Alexandria (compare A.D. 190-220) "Our Lord was born in the twenty-eighth year when first the census was ordered to be taken in the reign of Augustus" (Stromata, Book i, see Clark's edition i. pages 444-445). If that is correct, and it is true that a Census was taken every fourteen years, then the next would fall in A.D. 10, and the succeeding one would have been due A.D. 24. 4 Notably the day of the crucifixion, etc (see Appendix 156 and Appendix 165). 5 His statements are, however, very vague, and he mentions several dates claimed by others as correct. 6 Osiris reincarnated. 7 See Wilkinson's Ancient Egyptians, Volume III, page 79 (Birch's edition). 8 It is true that the Lebanon shepherds are in the habit of keeping their flocks alive during the winter months, by cutting down branches of trees in the forests in that district, to feed the sheep on the leaves and twigs, when in autumn the pastures are dried up, and in winter, when snow covers the ground (compare Land and Book, page 204), but there is no evidence that the Bethlehem district was afforested in the manner. 9 Reckoning of course from Ethanim or Tisri - the First month of the civil year. The sacred year was six month later, and began on 1st Nisan. 10 The "city" is not named (possibly Juttah, some 30 miles to the south of Jerusalem). 11 The conception of John Baptist was, in view of Luke 1:7, as miraculous as that of Isaac; but it is not necessary to insist upon the complete period of forty sevens in the case of Elizabeth. Therefore the birth of the Forerunner may have been three or four days short of the full two hundred and eighty days, - as indicated in the above table.
|
Very poorly researched article.
The discrepancy in dates between the Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholics has nothing to do with disagreement of the time of Christ’s birth; The Catholics realigned their calendars, while the Orthodox didn’t.
Origen’s mocking of birthdays hardly has any relevance to Christmas; he’s not mocking that people recall fondly a birthday, but what he sees as immoral behavior and general jackassery.
Early Christians had two reasons for deciding that Dec. 25th was Christmas... and they certainly were aware of the Mediterranean climate when they did so:
First was the belief that great prophets were assumed into heaven on the day they had been conceived on Earth, their “heavenly birthday.” Since (using the Western calendar) Jesus was believed to have been killed on Friday, March 25th, that date became celebrated as the Feast of the Annunciation (whereas Good Friday remained tied to the Christian interpretation of the Hebrew calendar). December 25th was 9 months after that.
Second, Jesus identified himself as the true and everlasting Temple of Zion. (”Destroy this Temple and on the third day, I will raise it up...”) Dec. 25th was celebrated as the Feast of the Dedication, when the Spirit of the Living God indwelled within the Temple. Hence, it makes sense to celebrate Dec. 25th as the day when the Spirit of the Living God indwelled within Mankind. In fact, it was on Dec. 25th that Christ actually identified himself as the Temple.
Neither of these suppositions are historical in nature, but both are very pious.
Not all of us.
NOT according to the Father.
Deu 12:30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.
Deu 12:31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.
Deu 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.