Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
>>Since the Church in Acts 15 is the same Church offering the Eucharist, clearly, the prohibition on eating blood was understood to refer to things other that the Eucharist.<<

Interesting how the apostles didn't make that distinction but you do.

2,083 posted on 12/19/2014 5:50:50 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear
apostles didn't make that distinction

St. Paul, for example, wrote of the blood in the Eucharist without hesitation, and he was present at the Jerusalem council also:

Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. (1 Cor. 11:27)

2,226 posted on 12/19/2014 7:11:22 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2083 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson