Posted on 12/04/2014 8:40:00 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
“Gay marriage supporters are not suddenly going to get all shocked at polygamy.”
No, they won’t be shocked. BUT I suspect that they would hate it. If nothing else, it confirms that men belong with women.
I am only asking advocates of gay marriage how they would argue against, if at all, legal plural marriage.
While there are obviously men who want other men it is hate toward God that this is all about and not about rights but only in the name of rights.
The idea is to defy God and cause as many people as they can to do the same.
What better way to defy God than to legalize an abomination such as sodomy and putting choice on abortion.
Woman was made for man, I have no doubt the anti Gods hate that with a passion.
They will be shocked when the polygamists get large enough to impose Sharia Law and behead them.
Polygamy isn’t limited by sex in a society that allows same sexes to marry.
Mormons don’t have the large army they had at one time, they won’t be able to threaten Americans as they once did.
I don't know why you guys think that group marriage is going to be limited to hetrosexuals.
Agreed.
Doubt it. Who really wants to support Mormons to the extent that plenty of PC Support Islam? No one. Neither side of the political spectrum wants to sanction them. Christians don’t want them, Muslims don’t want anyone higher than them in authority, and liberals have no desire to uphold and make great speeches in favor of them. Muslims are a big corridor, because plenty of the left support and speak against concerns that people have regarding Islam. When it comes to pushing polygamy in, Muslims have it on the side, and they outnumber Mormons everywhere in a National population.
Yeah, I have a problem explaining Abraham and all the women and children he divided his inheritance among. A lot of Christians have a problem explaining that one.
But for the most part, I agree with your statement. Same-Sex “Marriage” is the highest on the pecking order because it gets at many major religions, even some of those who would sanction polygamy. It really is about hate of God and his religion more than anything else.
Not even a question of that, they don’t have the liberals pushing and backing them like the Muslims do. Any army they ever had would be child’s play compared to the US military anyways, and I am talking even whenever it was they came to be.
No, they won’t be shocked. BUT I suspect that they would hate it. If nothing else, it confirms that men belong with women.
The saying is don`t try to compare apples to oranges but that would be easy compared to trying to compare Polygamy with homosexuality.
Yeah, I have a problem explaining Abraham and all the women and children he divided his inheritance among.
If it had not been approved by God it would not have been.
I do not think we need to apologize to people who question what our founding fathers of the bible did.
Some people has to make the Bible fit their ideal before they can except it.
But I have never saw any one who was ideal or lived an ideal life.
Sorry for the late reply.
If consenting adults want get married, get married.
You should not to have to ask the state for permission.
Homosexuals can get “married” now.
Exchange your vows, have a party, go on a honeymoon, whatever floats your boat.
Now, if you are asking for special or preferential treatment from the state because of your assumed new status, that is another question entirely.
Here’s how I see it. It’s already decriminalized, whether it is trumpeted or not. Nobody cares, for instance, if I was living in a home with however many women and had relations with them, and had children with them, etc.. If there is any cohabitation law, then it is not enforced. If there’s any goal with marriage, it is to legitimize criminalization of religion. Polygamy has nowhere near the potential as homosexual civil rights to do that. The only approach sensible in that direction would be to legalize it, criminalize it, and arrest the religions who reinstate it, but most people with any sense wouldn’t buy it. And that’s besides the fact that most people with half a brain recognize it for a house of cards in today’s world of no fault divorce and court battles over how inheritance splits up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.