Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 reasons why people want to believe Jesus was married
Religious News Service ^ | 11/20/2014 | David Gibson

Posted on 11/20/2014 2:41:48 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Another day, another stunning blockbuster report that … Jesus was married! And to Mary Magdalene!

The latest version of this meme comes from Simcha Jacobovici, an author and filmmaker who is famous for promoting stunning theories about Jesus that on further review often turn out to be dubious.

Jacobovici’s new claim that he has decoded an old text that reveals Jesus and the Magdalene were married and had two kids (and she was a “co-deity” with her husband) came out this month and has also been widely dismissed.

But as happened earlier this year with the so-called “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” — a suspect papyrus that receives a further debunking in the latest edition of the Atlantic — people find Jesus’ sex life endlessly fascinating, and plausible.

Why is that? Here are five reasons.

1. Biblical archaeology has primed people for surprises

There is nothing new under the sun, the Book of Ecclesiastes says, yet amazing discoveries in recent decades seem to tell a different story. Excavations in the Holy Land have yielded remarkable artifacts that provide unexpected insights into Bible history. But the emergence of ancient papyrus texts from the sands of Egypt really upended scriptural studies — and many common assumptions about Christianity.

The discovery at Nag Hammadi in 1945 of a cache of old texts, some of them “gospels” of the so-called Gnostic school — an early branch of Christianity — may be the most famous. Many of these texts, which were only popularized in the 1980s, present an alternate version of Christianity that seems to exalt the role of women, and even suggests that Jesus was intimate with a woman, probably Mary Magdalene.

Given that background, it’s no surprise any new blockbuster claim is assumed to be credible.

2. Everyone wants a Jesus in his/her own image

Biblical scholarship in the past two centuries has fed periodic “quests” for the historical Jesus, the “real” Jesus.

But as the theologian and humanitarian Albert Schweitzer noted more than a century ago, we wind up creating a Jesus in our own image.

And so it continues today, as modern Christians see Jesus as a successful businessman, a proto-Marxist, a political zealot, a vegetarian, or maybe a gay man. Or, more commonly, married with children — an Ozzie and Harriet savior for an America that aspires to a secure middle-class life, a messiah who is also a best friend.

3. Every nice Jewish boy gets married. Right?

If Jesus isn’t the guy next door, there is a growing recognition by modern Christians that he was a first-century Jewish man. But that recognition also brings along an assumption — or maybe a stereotype — that all Jewish men get married and have a bunch of kids, or want to.

That wasn’t necessarily the case in Jesus’ day, as Vanderbilt University Bible scholar Amy-Jill Levine, among others, has noted. There are in fact accounts of monastic-like communities of celibate Jews, such as the Essenes, that may have drawn adherents like John the Baptist or even Jesus. They were praised by the contemporary chronicler Philo of Alexandria for an “enviable system of life” that was hailed by kings and ordinary people alike.

4. People love conspiracies more than facts

Many wonder if there wasn’t something else going on — a cover-up, perhaps? Poverty is one thing. But chastity?

From the Kennedy assassination to the moon landing, any claim becomes suspect in an era marked by a deep mistrust of institutions — and there are plenty of revelations to foster such doubts — NSA, anyone? Institutional religion is hardly exempt from this trend. (Hello, clergy sex abuse scandal?)

“The Da Vinci Code,” with its tale of an age-old Catholic brotherhood willing to do anything to protect the secret about the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, may be a thrilling novel. But you just KNOW it could be true.

5. Boys rule. Girls … ?

The emergence of women’s rights has been one of the signature developments of modern life. But it has also proved to be an enormous challenge to male-dominated religions, and Christianity has been pretty much run by men since the beginning.

Or was it?

As women stake a claim to authority in churches, many want to bolster that argument by reclaiming the historic role of women in early Christianity. Mary Magdalene, long known as the “Apostle to the Apostles” for her central role in supporting Jesus’ ministry and announcing his resurrection, is a key figure in that effort.

The chief problem with hailing the Magdalene as “Mrs. Jesus” is that this hypothesis may be undermining the very goals women’s advocates want to advance. Making her the vicar’s wife, as it were, standing by her man and performing her wifely duties, is not necessarily the image feminist Christians want to highlight.

Nor does it reflect the record in the New Testament Gospels and the early Christian tradition.


TOPICS: Current Events; History; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: history; jesus; marriage; marymagdalene; simchajacobovici
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: SeekAndFind; NYer; SkyDancer

If one, or perhaps two, actually studied the Bible, they and three would realize that Jesus had the hots for Mary of Bethany! and if you add one, two and three, they make it six reasons for Jesus and Mary of Bethany to be husband and wife.

The sarcasm rating of the above post is: 348.957346875%


21 posted on 11/20/2014 4:12:39 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Need a sarcasm meter like you know, that other one.


22 posted on 11/20/2014 4:16:01 PM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Where does it state that not being married would be mentioned? How common was the names Jesus, Joseph and Mary back then? Were all the disciples married? If not is it significant that it’s not mentioned but it is for Jesus?


23 posted on 11/20/2014 4:36:11 PM PST by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TBP

This is meant as a smear to Jesus and a stumbling block to Christians. There is not too much that hasn’t been alleged about Jesus, and I am not about to repeat them. Not every Christian is so enlightened that they can absorb all libelous accusations. Jesus Christ was the Lord of the Old Testament that incarnated as Jesus in the New. He did not marry—goes back to Old Testament rules.


24 posted on 11/20/2014 4:37:11 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What people is the headline talking about?


25 posted on 11/20/2014 4:38:21 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

why would God marry?


26 posted on 11/20/2014 4:40:23 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

If someone believes that Jesus was married, then they believe he was just a mere mortal human and not God. If you think that doesn’t affect faith and Christianity, you are crazy


27 posted on 11/20/2014 4:42:38 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: odawg

That is reason #1.

The writers should have consulted you before going to print.


28 posted on 11/20/2014 5:07:05 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP
In that culture, in that time, it was expected for a young man to be married. Had he been, it would most likely have gone unnoticed. Had he not been, it would most likely have been reported -- because it would be unusual.

Perhaps it was reported that Jesus never married...

29 posted on 11/20/2014 6:18:43 PM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

As far as our Salvation is concerned it doesn’t matter a bit, but my opinion is that he was never married or with a woman because of the following Scripture.

Revelation 14:4 New International Version (NIV)

4 These are those who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and the Lamb.

If they can’t defile themselves then Jesus didn’t either.

1 Corinthians 7:1 New International Version (NIV)

7 Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.”


31 posted on 11/20/2014 9:02:47 PM PST by mrobisr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Not necessarily.


32 posted on 11/21/2014 7:09:54 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

There are no reports to that effect that I know of.


33 posted on 11/21/2014 7:10:27 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: odawg
This is meant as a smear to Jesus and a stumbling block to Christians.

No, it is not. It's simply a study of what details we know about the life of Jesus to answer a specific question.

34 posted on 11/21/2014 7:11:56 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Where does it state that not being married would be mentioned? How common was the names Jesus, Joseph and Mary back then? Were all the disciples married? If not is it significant that it’s not mentioned but it is for Jesus?

Marriage was the norm. Not to be married when you're 30, in that day and age, would be remarkable and be remarked upon, unless you were a member of some ascetic order. (Jesus reportedly spent some time studying with the Essenes, but was not an Essene himself.)

The names Jesus, Joseph, and Mary were not all that common, from what I understand. Jesus's name (Yeshua) especially. To have all three of these names, plus James and (later) another Mary in one family would be fairly uncommon.

A couple of the disciples were known to have been married. But their ages are never mentioned, nor the marital status of most of them, so we'll never know. But again, if not, it would be unusual after a certain (fairly young) age.

The story is about Jesus, with the disciples as featured players. Nobody really cares if Matthew or James or Thomas was married.

35 posted on 11/21/2014 7:18:52 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“If someone believes that Jesus was married, then they believe he was just a mere mortal human and not God.”

Agreed. On the other hand, if Jesus and Mary had children, then there must be, somewhere on earth, his descendents, who have inherited some part of his divine nature. So, there must really be an elite race who are destined to rule the rest of us. Who they are, nobody knows, but I’ll bet they are all liberals, Democrats, members of the CFR and of the Illuminati! They are the divine elite, at least in their own minds.


36 posted on 11/21/2014 7:29:48 AM PST by TIElniff (Autonomy is the guise of every graceless heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TIElniff

lol


37 posted on 11/21/2014 9:06:21 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think people want to believe it because it would be a “gotcha!” against Christians. Like, “See? Everything you believe is wrong!”

But why would Jesus marry? He said at one point that He had no place to lay down His head. That would have been a very tough life for His wife and kids. He also knew He was going to be crucified, leaving his wife a widow and his children fatherless. It doesn’t make sense that He would have married.


38 posted on 11/21/2014 2:07:45 PM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Married? No. No evidence whatsoever. Brothers & possibly sisters? Yes. Scripture does point to it.


39 posted on 11/21/2014 2:15:24 PM PST by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson