Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Idaho Pastors Face Jail Time, Thousands in Fines for Not Performing Gay Weddings
Christian Post ^ | October 20, 2014 | Anugrah Kumar

Posted on 10/20/2014 10:08:03 AM PDT by DaveMSmith

Two ordained Christian pastors in Idaho have filed a federal lawsuit and a motion for temporarily restraining Coeur d'Alene city officials from forcing them to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies or face prosecution for violating "non-discrimination" laws.

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed the lawsuit and the motion on behalf of Donald Knapp and his wife, Evelyn, who run Hitching Post Wedding Chapel and have been required by city officials to perform gay ceremonies or face months in jail and/or thousands of dollars in fines.

The city says its non-discrimination ordinance requires them to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies because the courts have overridden Idaho's voter-approved constitutional amendment that affirmed marriage as the union of a man and a woman.

(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...


TOPICS: Activism; Current Events; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: hitchingpost; homosexualagenda; idaho; lawsuit; liberalfascism; pastors; ssm; ssmministers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2014 10:08:03 AM PDT by DaveMSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

These “human rights” laws and commissions are just work arounds on the Constitution. We have a right to free association. They’re just pro-homosexual enforcement outfits.


2 posted on 10/20/2014 10:10:55 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

There is poverty, violence, war, disease, and tragedy all around the world. There are people in need but yet they throw so many resources at the gay agenda. They act as if there is nothing else matters in the world. All that matters to these small minded perverts is that they can have perverted sex.

They’re all small-minded perverts consumed with nothing but their twisted behavior.


3 posted on 10/20/2014 10:14:45 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith; Chode

Was reading the comments and found this...

“Thier being ministers is irrelevant because they are not a church, they are a for profit business. If they don’t want to perform the ceremony themselves, they don’t have to. They can bring in another minister, a rabbi an justice of the peace. What they cannot do is refuse to rent their for profit business to a customer based on thier religious beliefs.”

This person makes a point. They could just say “we can’t but will get you someone who can” and do just that.


4 posted on 10/20/2014 10:15:34 AM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

“The Hitching Post” would have a hard time claiming to be a church. These pastors are in a vulnerable position legally. Businesses and churches both have rights, of course, but this case is a bit of a tangle. The local authorities seem to be taking advantage of the ambiguity.


5 posted on 10/20/2014 10:20:28 AM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

Hitching Post Wedding Chapel.

To me it sounds like a for-profit wedding facility that wouldn’t provide much in the way of pre-marriage counseling.

I’m sure that the couple running it genuinely believe that homosexual marriage is wrong, and I certainly don’t believe they should be forced to provide to gays, any more than a baker or photographer should.

But they aren’t running a church; they’re running a for-profit wedding facility. When heterosexuals have an impulsive wedding, they generally aren’t doing the institution of marriage any favors.


6 posted on 10/20/2014 10:21:39 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

Sounds like somebody needs to conduct an exorcism down at City Hall.....


7 posted on 10/20/2014 10:24:45 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

These “human rights” laws and commissions are just work arounds on the Constitution.


That is our strength. You can’t legally work “around” the constitution. Only if you are a publicly held company does the freedom of association and religion not hold water.


8 posted on 10/20/2014 10:26:04 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boycott

It would be funny if one of these pastors agreed to do it but everything he said was from the bible passages regarding homosexuality, and then said, “as a pastor for the Christian faith, I find it impossible to marry you on religious grounds. However, you are entering into a civil union which the state wishes to label “marriage”. It is in no way a marriage from the biblical perspective and in the eyes of God, but if you sign the paperwork, I’ll endorse that you have entered into a civil contract, easily broken, that the state calls ‘marriage’”.

And there you go.


9 posted on 10/20/2014 10:29:43 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

That is not actually how it works for most pastors, but these guys may not be “pastors” in the literal sense.


10 posted on 10/20/2014 10:30:55 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

And my liberal acquaintances confidently assured me that it was just a RWNJ fantasy, that there was no way that clergy would be compelled like this.


11 posted on 10/20/2014 10:35:24 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("World History is not full of good governments, or of good voters either "--P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

It seems to me that to err on the side of the first amendment would be the best option but Idaho does not seem to care. The idea of forcing an establishment to hire a third party as agent/employee to act in a way their religion prohibits would be unheard of until these days of Romney/Obamacare.

There is no longer any religious protection in the US (unless you are Muslim of course). So the very reason this country was founded has now been vaporized. What is worse is that there are conservatives saying profit motive causes people to lose their religious rights.

Looks like Lyndon Johnson has done his work for the cause. When he decided it was alright for Congress to make laws with respect to religion that would prohibit the free exercise of all religion and religious speech whenever profit is produced.


12 posted on 10/20/2014 10:45:27 AM PDT by Waryone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

He should not be willing to change, “Do you take this man?” “Do you take this woman?” I wonder if the homos would agree to that?


13 posted on 10/20/2014 10:50:33 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
This person makes a point. They could just say “we can’t but will get you someone who can” and do just that.

No. They can't. Their conviction is that they will not permit evil in their business. To do what you suggest is cowardly and conspires with evil. If one doesn't understand that now, then one may never understand what it takes to keep integrity and character in place.
14 posted on 10/20/2014 10:51:18 AM PDT by righttackle44 (Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Only if you are a publicly held company does the freedom of association and religion not hold water.

Even then it should still hold water. A company should be able to associate, or not associate, with whoever they want, for whatever reason they want. Otherwise you're forced into a contract with an entity you don't agree with at the point of the gun that is government.
15 posted on 10/20/2014 11:00:54 AM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

They are ordained pastors so they should have religious freedoms. Apparently FReepers are all for the homosexual agenda. Churches will be next and can’t wait for their excuses then.

Pray FR wakes up


16 posted on 10/20/2014 11:03:53 AM PDT by bray (Read: Republic of Texas 2022)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

They’ll NEVER be satisfied with these victories and NEVER stop pushing for additional concessions because they are driven by an unending hatred of anything that reminds them of their own perverse nature. This leads us to the horrifying realization that eventually, given enough time, every perverse demand they can make, they WILL make.


17 posted on 10/20/2014 11:12:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

They’re all small-minded perverts consumed with nothing but their twisted behavior.


That is right and it is like I read in probably a Mark twain book, that about 95 percent of men are cowards and will go with the crowd.

The queers have managed to make it seem as though they are excepted by the majority so most people are afraid (too cowardly) to say what they really think of them which does make it seem to be true.


18 posted on 10/20/2014 11:14:26 AM PDT by ravenwolf (` know if an other temple will be built or not but the)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

I believe Mark Twain nailed that one. I believe in calling a pervert a pervert. That’s what they are.


19 posted on 10/20/2014 11:17:44 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
They can bring in another minister, a rabbi an justice of the peace.

Unfortunately not, since that would still make them morally complicit in the marriage.

20 posted on 10/20/2014 11:22:30 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Democrats are Cruz'n for a Bruisin' in 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson