you must have missed the thread yesterday where the inquisition was defended
Regarding a comment to you upthread, the original Douay-Rheims went very much unadopted and ignored. This, to the point of the later revised Challoner Douay-Rheims being largely drawn from the widely adopted King James. But, here we see an apparent attempt at replacing the KJV as instrumental in standardizing the English language, attributing this instead to that original Douay-Rheims. I’ve seen similar attempts to claim the Founders. Revise history to claim the positive, revise history to deny the negative. It’s disturbing.