Posted on 10/07/2014 2:07:33 PM PDT by NYer
At the opening of the Synod on the Family, participants were reminded that the Church's pastoral approach towards persons with same-sex attraction is an issue worthy of attention.
Over the next two weeks, the Extraordinary Synod on the Pastoral Challenges of the Family in the Context of Evangelization will explore the various concerns faced by families today: among them, the pastoral care of individuals with same-sex attraction.
In his remarks on Oct. 6, general relator for the synod Cardinal Peter Erdo said there was “a broad consensus that people with a homosexual orientation should not be discriminated against,” and that most Catholics do not expect same-sex relationships to “be equated with marriage between a man and a woman.”
However, he noted that there is no “consensus among the vast majority of Catholics on the ideology of gender theories.”
The cardinal based his remarks on the data contained in the Instrumentum Laboris – a working document published earlier this year as part of the preparations for the synod. The document is a compilation of responses to a questionnaire sent out to families at the end of 2013 designed to assess the pastoral needs of the global Church with regard to the needs of the family.
Addressing a wide range of issues cited by the document which relate to the family, he noted how “the majority of human beings seek personal happiness in life with a permanent bond between a man and a woman, together with the children of their union.” However, “the specific aspects of doctrine and the Church's Magisterium on marriage and family are not always sufficiently well-known by the faithful.”
Although Cardinal Erdo spoke just briefly about the pastoral care of individuals with same-sex attraction in his intervention at the synod on Monday morning, the passages from the working document he referred to address the issues in greater length.
One of the themes addressed in the Instrumentum Laboris regards the civil recognition of same-sex unions as determined by “socio-cultural, religious and political” contexts. According to the episcopal conferences, one example includes those places where “repressive and punitive measures,” are taken against “homosexuality in all its aspects,” and public manifestation of homosexuality “is prohibited by civil law.”
In such contexts, according to the document, “the Church provides different forms of spiritual care for single, homosexual people who seek the Church's assistance.” Other circumstances include places where homosexuality is tolerated so long as it remains hidden, as well as states which recognize civil unions and – in some cases – so-called “marriages” between same-sex couples.
Every bishops' conference opposes the redefinition of marriage, according to the document. At the same time, they express a desire to find “a balance between the Church's teaching on the family and respectful, non-judgemental attitude towards people living in such unions.”
“On the whole,” the document states, “the extreme reactions to these unions, whether compromising or uncompromising, do not seem to have facilitated the development of an effective pastoral program which is consistent with the Magisterium and compassionate towards the persons concerned.”
An additional factor complicating the Church's pastoral care for those with same-sex attraction pertains to the promotion of “gender ideology” – a point highlighted by Cardinal Erdo during his intervention Monday morning.
Although aimed at eliminating homophobia, the introduction of this gender ideology (in some places at the elementary level) leads to the spreading of a mentality which “proposes, in fact, to undermine sexual identity.”
Finally, the Instrumentum Laboris addresses the concern surrounding the pastoral care of children of same-sex couples. The responses to the questionnaire, according to the document, indicate clear opposition “to legislation which would allow the adoption of children by persons in a same-sex union,” due to the “risk to the integral good of the child, who has the right to have a mother and father.”
Pastoral concerns arise, however, in cases where same-sex couples request baptism for the children in their care. The majority consensus from Catholics around the world is that children in these cases “must be received with the same care, tenderness and concern which is given to other children.” That being said, the document stressed the need to ensure children raised by same-sex couples would be properly instructed in the faith.
The Instrumentum Laboris also highlights some general pastoral guidelines with regard to persons with SSA, and the various issues which depend on whether or not have chosen to pursue a homosexual life style.
Many episcopal conferences have addressed the need for pastoral programs. Others expressed unease at the prospect of welcoming those with same-sex attraction in a spirit that is at once merciful and true to Catholic teaching, “all the while attempting to provide appropriate pastoral care which takes every aspect of the person into consideration.” Still others stress the importance of terminology, with some recommending against the use of terms such as “gay,” “lesbian” or “homosexual” as a way of defining a person's identity.
On the whole, however, “the great challenge will be to develop a ministry which can maintain the proper balance between accepting persons in a spirit of compassion,” the working document said, “gradually guiding them to authentic human and Christian maturity.”
Ignorance of the populace vs naivete of the episcopate. Generalizing same-sex attracted individuals as a group can never work, as it contains other nuanced aspects like trans-gendered and cross dressers. Ping!
“Although aimed at eliminating homophobia, the introduction of this gender ideology (in some places at the elementary level) leads to the spreading of a mentality which proposes, in fact, to undermine sexual identity.
HUH???
You can’t deny them entry to the church. But you don’t have to condone it just because our government calls you a homophobe. Has “0” to do with hate. The government just made that up.
Yes, and they need to remain celibate and never act on their impulses.
When will Webster’s update the meaning of ‘phobia’ to something like...
Phobia - “to disagree because of moral or logical reasons”
There’s a huge difference between same sex attraction and acting on those temptations. In our evangelical church, we teach that acting on homosexual feelings is clearly sinful. We also have groups, counseling and mentoring available for those who are struggling with same sex attraction, but want repent.
This at least opens the door to help these people learn about Christ. In many cases they accept Christ and find their identity in Him, instead of in their sexuality. Some have found complete healing from their homosexual feelings. Others have submitted to Christ and abstained from any sexual relations out of obedience to the Lord.
We often find out that homosexuals are simple messed up people, and Christ’s power works in them as it does with other habitual sinners.
As long as we're aiming for the non-judgmental thing.
You probably need to post the Caucus rules.
That’s how our church handles it.
I think doing otherwise risks scandalizing the rest of the parish.
The Catholic Church places the exact same restrictions on all persons, Sexual relations outside of marriage is forbidden.
I think you have defined the only solution that remains Christian. Compassion, love, acceptance. But not license and willful blindness. You do no one a service when you ease the pathway to Hell.
Tell them it’s a SIN, just like if they were thieves!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.