They can always join the black student alliance, en masse.
Is there Muslim Student Organization?
That policy is not “anti” discrimination
Join the LGBT group, elect yourself as leaders and pray for all of them.
IMO, this could all be avoided by the University if all groups had to be self-funded and not use any university or government funds or meet on university property.
OTOH, I’m sure that the NAACP and/or the Democrats have a group meeting on the campus. All the non-Blacks that are Conservative and/or Republicans should attend their meetings in a large enough block to elect “one of their kind” to be in a leadership position. We know how welcome whites are as NAACP members. Or perhaps a group of devout Bible readers could start attending the poetry club and insist on reading and discussing the Bible, perhaps beginning with the book of Psalms.
Never really understood why people would want to be part of a group with which they had little in common. Of course, most of these issues have little to do with common logic.
The lever here is a simple one, not a membership constraint, but a leadership constraint.
For example, a foreign language club would likely insist that because its meetings are conducted in a foreign language, its leaders must speak that language. Thus it is not discriminatory for that to be a requirement.
Likewise, in a Christian club, they could create a competency requirement for the subject matter, for all leaders. That this competency would exclude students who were not scholars of Christianity is not prejudicial.
The competency would likely require Christian explanations of the miraculous to the point where it would gag any atheist or non-Christian.
Hey, I went to school there in 1976 (the campus is actually in Rohnert Park). Didn’t stay, though. It was just one stop on a long journey of schools and majors in the days when I was a professional student. Had some fun times there, though.