Posted on 09/11/2014 7:48:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
Cardinal Francis George, head of the Catholic archdiocese of Chicago, said the levers of power in government, education, entertainment, and media are enforcing a “public creed,” a “fake church” that requires all citizens to approve of gay marriage and related sexual anomalies or be punished by the State, just “as Christians and Jews are fined for their religion in countries governed by Sharia law.”
Cardinal George, who was president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in 2007-10, made his remarks in his Sept. 7 column for the archdiocesean newspaper. In his commentary, the cardinal explains that America, despite social frictions at certain times, had always strived to ensure religious freedom and respect for different religions.
The State, in the past, had “kept its promise to protect all religions and not become a rival to them, a fake church,” said the cardinal.
But that has now changed, he said. “In recent years, society has brought social and legislative approval to all types of sexual relationships that used to be considered ‘sinful,’” he continued. “Since the biblical vision of what it means to be human tells us that not every friendship or love can be expressed in sexual relations, the church’s teaching on these issues is now evidence of intolerance for what the civil law upholds and even imposes.”
“What was once a request to live and let live has now become a demand for approval,” said Cardinal George, whose archdiocese includes about 2.2 million Catholics. “The ‘ruling class,’ those who shape public opinion in politics, in education, in communications, in entertainment, is using the civil law to impose its own form of morality on everyone.”
“We are told that, even in marriage itself, there is no difference between men and women, although nature and our very bodies clearly evidence that men and women are not interchangeable at will in forming a family,” he said. “Nevertheless, those who do not conform to the official religion, we are warned, place their citizenship in danger.”
The cardinal then noted that Americans who objected on religious grounds to the Obamacare mandate on contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortion-inducing drugs, were chastised by many in the media, including the liberal Huffington Post, which claimed the opposition, and the six Catholic judges on the Supreme Court, raised “concerns about the compatibility between being a Catholic and being a good citizen.”
This was not the anti-Catholic voice of nativists, or the Know-Nothing Party, or the Ku Klux Klan, said the cardinal, but, “rather, the self-righteous voice of some members of the American establishment today who regard themselves as ‘progressive’ and ‘enlightened.’”
“The inevitable result is a crisis of belief for many Catholics,” said Cardinal George. “Throughout history, when Catholics and other believers in revealed religion have been forced to choose between being taught by God or instructed by politicians, professors, editors of major newspapers and entertainers, many have opted to go along with the powers that be.”
“This reduces a great tension in their lives, although it also brings with it the worship of a false god,” he said. “It takes no moral courage to conform to government and social pressure. It takes a deep faith to ‘swim against the tide,’ as Pope Francis recently encouraged young people to do at last summer’s World Youth Day.”
The cardinal continued, “Swimming against the tide means limiting one’s access to positions of prestige and power in society. It means that those who choose to live by the Catholic faith will not be welcomed as political candidates to national office, will not sit on editorial boards of major newspapers, will not be at home on most university faculties, will not have successful careers as actors and entertainers.”
“Nor will their children, who will also be suspect,” he said.
“Since all public institutions, no matter who owns or operates them, will be agents of the government and conform their activities to the demands of the official religion, the practice of medicine and law will become more difficult for faithful Catholics,” said Cardinal George. “It already means in some States that those who run businesses must conform their activities to the official religion or be fined, as Christians and Jews are fined for their religion in countries governed by Sharia law.”
Cardinal George went on to argue that U.S. civil law has done much to weaken and destroy the family, which in turn has forced the State to impose more and more restrictions on people and their activities that are unloosed from the “internal restraints that healthy family life teaches.”
He also says that many of the “tenets of the official State religion” are largely dictated by elements of a certain social class, noting that “’same-sex marriage,’ as a case in point, is not an issue for the poor or those on the margins of society.”
How the situation may end, said the cardinal, is unclear because there are many Americans, “even among the ruling class, who do not want their beloved country to transform itself into a fake church.”
Catholics and traditional Christians know by faith, said Cardinal George, that Christ will return to judge the living and the dead and the church “will be there to meet Him.”
However, “[t]here is no such divine guarantee for any country, culture or society of this age or any age,” concluded Cardinal George.
The archdiocese of Chicago, established in 1843, serves about 2.2 million Catholics through 356 parishes, and with more than 1,400 priests and 1,600 women religious. The archdiocese operates 44 schools and 5 colleges, the latter educating 49,000 students. The archdiocese also oversees 17 Catholic hospitals, assisting 2.6 million people a year, and helps another 1.2 million people through 150-plus different charities.
He's got it right.
Wonder if he and Cardinal Tim ("Chuckles") Dolan are on speaking terms?
The cardinal is raising a critical issue that will be troubling to Catholics and other decent people of conscience in the future. If indeed the constitution of the United States allows the wholesale killing of innocent human life (more than 50,000,000 since 1973), should people of conscience take an oath to uphold and defend such a document? Can a decent person sit on a jury in the courtroom of a black robed federal judge knowing what horrors have been sanctioned in that chamber? The early Christians as a matter of conscience refused to serve in the Roman army or participate in civil proceedings. Has America reached that point?
He’s right, and I reject this “creed”.
Dolan needs to be defrocked for his actions
Amen, brothah.
Other than his eschatology, this cardinal is 100% right. It’s wonderful that a Cardinal is saying these things.
“Now, since the family and human society at large spring from marriage, these men will on no account allow matrimony to be the subject of the jurisdiction of the Church. Nay, they endeavor to deprive it of all holiness, and so bring it within the contracted sphere of those rights which, having been instituted by man, are ruled and administered by the civil jurisprudence of the community. Wherefore it necessarily follows that they attribute all power over marriage to civil rulers, and allow none whatever to the Church; and, when the Church exercises any such power, they think that she acts either by favor of the civil authority or to its injury. Now is the time, they say, for the heads of the State to vindicate their rights unflinchingly, and to do their best to settle all that relates to marriage according as to them seems good.”
Pope Leo XIII, 1880
He warned about the civil authorities defining marriage 130+ years ago. To the state in the modern era, marriage can only be what judges, pols, or the voting majority think it can be at any one time, and that’s the bottom line.
Freegards
My own Catholic ancestors came to the USA from the Rheinpfalz Palatinate area of German in around 1871, fleeing from Bismarck's Kulturkampf. At that time, as I remember the history, the Popes condemned civil marriage (as was instituted by Bismarck) precisely because it was a radical redefiniton of marriage.
And considering the almost-universal acceptance of altered, contraceptive sex amongst the so-called heterosexuals, it seems as if nobody in prnciple or in practice actually rejects unnatural sex and unnatural marriage.
Only a very few "heteros" have marriages that are even natural, let alone sacramental. And grace builds on nature.
Cardinal George is absolutely right but you will not see hardly any replies from protestants on his words. You know why? He’s right and most protestant posters on FR can’t give a Catholic credit for anything.
That’s the problem, it could be a radical redefinition or it could be pretty close. A lot of benefits to good civil involvement, on the other hand ‘gay marriage’ and who knows what else and punishments if you disagree. What do you think about those who have suggested the Church may have to divorce itself from state involvement in marriage?
FReegards
I think it’s a viewpoint which deserves careful consideration.
It’s probably going to happen eventually, but I guess the debate is whether to do it now as a demonstration that what the state and Church mean by marriage have nothing to do with each other, or wait until the state does it as a punishment for not accepting their full definition of marriage.
Freegards
We will probably get slammed but I do believe it has.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.