Skip to comments.
How the King James Bible changed the world
baylor.edu ^
Posted on 09/09/2014 7:52:23 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 last
To: RoosterRedux
In all due respect, I am not sure I understand that reference.
No problem. Luke 3:8
Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of penance; and do not begin to say, We have Abraham for our father. For I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children to Abraham.
121
posted on
09/11/2014 5:27:54 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
To: RoosterRedux
I don't trust the Pope and I don't trust Martin Luther.
I'll add, Heck, I don't even trust myself!"
In the case of the Pope, his infallibility only extends to solemnly proclaimed teachings on Faith and morals intended to be binding on the whole Church. In other areas, he may have authority (Church legislation, laws of Vatican City), mere human expertise on a subject in which he is well-versed (Theology, Philosophy), or regular run of the mill human opinion. The infallibility part is only part of God's promise to St. Peter regarding the Gates of Hell.
The Church is a composite Institution, and is Holy in as much as it is Instituted by Christ, but still full of sinners, often sinning in the name of the Church. Through a continuous line of Bishops going back the Apostles, God Himself has touched every one of them. In part because of my Faith in the Gospel of St. John (chapter 6), I believe God meant for mere men to provide us with His Body and Blood under the form of bread.
Your instinct to test everything is a good one. And while God IS completely accessible, he has decided to place a veil so that we can live by Faith, and the risk is to use accessibility to God to justify ourselves. It is a risk for every man.
122
posted on
09/11/2014 5:44:01 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
To: Dr. Sivana
Ditto to what you said and double dittos to the “Heck, I don’t even trust myself.”
To: RoosterRedux
You are confused. The Word of God spreading around the world changed the world. Things printed...literature, etc...that's nice. But it is the Word of God that changed the world. Not to interfere but you need to let go of the Catholic thing and put your focus on the Lord. seeing that the Catholic church was the ONLY source for Christian information to be spread throughout the world, it was, of course, the reason that so many people became educated in what Christianity really was. Since the written word was not, until the 16th century, a very effective means of spreading anything. The people attended Mass, heard the entire bible preached over a three year period, experienced pictures, statues, decorated stained glass windows, and were members of the only Christian family in the world.....That's how the word of God was spread.....not by a mega-preacher on TV.
To: terycarl; RoosterRedux
“heard the entire bible preached over a three year period”
No, they did not.
Pre-Vatican II, only about 1% of the Old Testament was covered, and about 16% of the New Testament.
The current one, read on Sundays and major feast days, covers about 40% of the NT and 4% of the Old.
http://catholic-resources.org/Lectionary/Statistics.htm
Re: The King James Bible. Here’s a wonderful video I found, unfortunately unavailable on DVD. Terrific stuff. Benson Bobrick: “In the English speaking world, it would become the Vulgate of the Protestant faith.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yalVKnNMbKM
126
posted on
03/19/2015 7:05:28 PM PDT
by
donaldo
To: redgolum
The NRSV is in the tradition of the King James - tries to preserve its style and flow but in modern English instead of the dated 17th Century Jacobean English used in the KJV.
Its literally accurate, which is why all the academic study Bibles - Access, New Intepreter’s, HarperCollins and New Oxford Annotated rely upon it.
The version strikes a nice balance between gender inclusiveness and customary English usage. If you’re looking for a literal readable translation, its a good one because its also ecumenical in intent and appeal.
127
posted on
03/29/2015 9:25:27 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson