**resulting in damnation and more errors**
According to whose authority and judgment?
I will also ask of you one question, and answer me. By whose authority and judgment did common folk follow an itinerant preacher in the desert who was rejected by the magisterium, and on why basis did another itinerant preacher who invoked him when asked of His authority establish his Truth claims? Was it the premise of assured personal infallibility, or Scriptural substantiation? . Answer me.
Is your RC argument is that an assuredly (if conditionally) infallible magisterium is essential for determination and assurance of Truth (including writings and men being of God) and to fulfill promises of Divine presence, providence of Truth, and preservation of faith, and authority.
And that being the historical instruments and stewards of Divine revelation (oral and written) means that Rome is that assuredly infallible magisterium. Thus those who dissent from the latter are in rebellion to God?