Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Spiritual Significance of a Traditional Church Wedding
The Atlantic ^ | 7/25/14 | Emma Green

Posted on 07/29/2014 6:22:34 AM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: old and tired
Ouch! But I guess, maybe that gets rid of the people who just think it would be nice to get married in a church because of the way it looks as opposed to belonging to the parish.

My parish was not the prettiest in the area, but it was home. I never thought about getting married else where. My sister wanted me to get married at her parish. But they were booked up. I was secretly glad. I left that parish because they were losey goosey and there was this Unitarian sister there. She thought she was Catholic. Took ten long years to get rid of her.

I lived an equal distance to either parish. The one I went to was built, because the other one got to big. So I did not break any rules about parishes.

41 posted on 07/29/2014 10:10:01 AM PDT by defconw (Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

Not surprised at the high costs of weddings at the churches. With so many churches struggling in the financial area, costs will go up when it comes to special ceromonies.


42 posted on 07/29/2014 10:39:39 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lsucat; Teófilo; NYer; Salvation; Nihil Obstat; mileschristi; bornacatholic; Mrs. Don-o; narses; ..

Faith of Our Fathers ping


43 posted on 07/29/2014 11:44:53 AM PDT by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
The #1 "denomination" is Catholics.

If counted as a separate denomination, the #2 denomination would be ex-Catholics.

That is literally true. One tenth of the population of the USA as a whole, is ex-Catholics.

44 posted on 07/29/2014 11:48:57 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

How is it they “could not” have a Mass? My husband was a baptized Baptist and we had a nuptial Mass. I don’t remember it being an issue at all. We even had my husband’s Baptist pastor brother-in-law do the First Reading.


45 posted on 07/29/2014 11:52:04 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Now that one's a surprise to me. It was 25 years ago, but the Catholic pastor didn't charge us anything for the wedding. And it wasn't even my parish: it was my mother's parish. We made a small donation (which was not even hinted at) to the pastor, and didn't spend a dime on flowers, either, because it was right after Christmas and the church was glorious with poinsettias.

Same thing with my father's funeral. There was no question of money. Again, I made a token offering to the pastor and additionally gave the organist/choir director $25 and she was actually shocked that I had made an offer of money.

46 posted on 07/29/2014 11:59:06 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Back when I was married, my better half was not Catholic but got a dispensation and we had a Mass. That was in 1975.

Maybe the regulations have changed. My son and now daughter-in-law were told that since she was not Catholic they could have a ceremony but not a Mass.

Whatever it is it worked out for all of us involved. My daughter-in-law wanted to have a Mass and did what she needed to do to get it.

47 posted on 07/29/2014 1:02:24 PM PDT by Slyfox (Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Ping!


48 posted on 07/29/2014 1:30:09 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Good for her! Blessings all around!


49 posted on 07/29/2014 2:09:35 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (May the Lord bless you and keep you, may He turn to you His countenance and give you peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: manc

I think that was a slam on your grammar.


50 posted on 07/29/2014 3:24:31 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo (Slavery, genocide, and imperialism aren't exclusively white institutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: defconw

same.

I was older, I though God told me marry this man

Now looking back maybe I was deluded....I don’t know


51 posted on 07/29/2014 3:43:11 PM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

it goes into the pastor’s slush fund


52 posted on 07/29/2014 3:48:59 PM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
<>I>St. Monica might bring him to the Church for you.

She helped get me back into the Church.

53 posted on 07/29/2014 3:49:42 PM PDT by verga (Conservative, leaning libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Even if you belong to the Parish? WOW! The Church was free, we paid the music director and the altar server, made a donation to the church for Father’s time and that was it.< /I>

Same here. The priest that married us refused to accept a cent. So I made a chalice and paten for him.

54 posted on 07/29/2014 3:53:17 PM PDT by verga (Conservative, leaning libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: verga

I tried to pay him, he said no. But we made a donation to one of the funds at the parish in his name.


55 posted on 07/29/2014 5:56:21 PM PDT by defconw (Both parties have clearly lost their minds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

yep, that used to be the norm.

now they charge as much (or more) for the church as they do they reception venue. So many couples simply opt to do the ceromony at the reception venue or elsewhere to save money.


56 posted on 07/30/2014 5:06:30 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Catholic church? Really? It is a violation of Canon Law to charge money for a Sacrament. The Sacrament costs nothing.

Any extras (essentially, rental and decoration of the site, services of choir, etc.) are extras. My own parents were married by the priest in the rectory (of course this is years ago) at no cost.

Even the priest's stipend can be waived. But it's as reasonable to pay the officiant for his time as it is to pay a caterer or a florist.

57 posted on 07/30/2014 5:15:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
It is a violation of Canon Law to charge money for a Sacrament. The Sacrament costs nothing.

You know, it's all semantics. The fact is Catholic churches in Philadelphia have been charging for the sacrament of matrimony for at least two decades. Is the charge for the use of the church or the priest's time or a combination of both those things? Is it an actual fee or is it a donation? In the words of Hillary Clinton: What difference does it make? If you can't be sacramentally married without forking over some money to your parish, then there's a fee for the sacrament.

Can the cost be waived? Absolutely! But the truth is most young people in Philadelphia who are hardpressed to come up wtih $500 unfortunately aren't considering a sacramental marriage in the first place. As I said in a previous post, having a Catholic wedding a) locally and b) announced six months in advance raises the price of the reception. We have to hope and pray the couples who avoid sacramental weddings because of the associated costs will ultimately return to the Church and have their marriages blessed. I've seen it happen several times so there is hope.

58 posted on 07/30/2014 3:25:25 PM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Come to think of it, there’s a charge for First Communions too. My daughter was in the hospital so I brought one of my grandchildren to the first Communion practice (at a parish other than my own) and when we signed in I was told we hadn’t yet paid the fee. A lot of folks hadn’t paid yet and they made a point of saying if it was a hardship to see the DRE. I’m sure it was a hardship for some folks - the fee was a $100!


59 posted on 07/30/2014 3:35:37 PM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson