Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church should be independent of Moscow.


8 posted on 07/05/2014 2:12:42 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998
In my opinion, yes. Ukraine should seek autocephaly under the Jerusalem Patriarchate. However, the picture is VERY complicated there. As Wikipedia tells us:

Ukrainian Orthodox Church may refer to:
Ukrainian Orthodox Church (disambiguation)

Note also that to the credit of Moscow Patriarchate, Patriarch Kirill did not go on the pseudo-patriotic neo-Soviet bandwagon. He never appeared to be endorsing the annexation of Crimea; his homilies on the Third Russian Civil War have been wise and moderate. The Orthodox tradition is that the local Church prays for the local authority regardless of the sympathies the flock or the clergy might have to the other side in the conflict. So, if Turkey gets itself in war as it has in the past, the Orthodox living in Turkey will be praying for the victory of the Turks. So the position of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (Kyiv), and that of Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church is closer to the tradition on the subject than Volodymyr's, who pushed for unity with the Moscow Patriarchate and now sees the Ukrainians leaving his church considering it collaborationist. But generally, the three large Ukrainian Orthodox Churches have behaved well in this conflict, in my opinion.

12 posted on 07/05/2014 2:59:34 PM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson