Oh, relax. If what I brought didn't include the quote you were referencing, then WHAT QUOTE are you talking about?
As far as I could tell, the "Trent" reference/quote made by Persevero included;
That was made in #38, which you later seemed to attribute to #31, which would be an impossibility, since #31 was a post made by...wait for it....yourself.
Now the above [in teal color] is found within what I posted to you. If there be some OTHER quote attributed to the Council of Trent, brought here by Persevero, then I'll confess to having missed it. Could you point it out to me?
I have searched this thread, and saw no other thing from Persevero presented as a quote from "Trent". You called it a lie. I PROVED OTHERWISE. Should I re-post and highlight that one sentence from the larger context portion, so that you may see it?
I'm not lying at all. I do wish you would stop with the ceaseless accusations.
What EXACTLY was the Persevero statement which he himself attributed to "Trent"?With yourself having referenced post #31, I went there looking for a Trent reference, found it was one of your own comments, went looking at adjacent posts, found #38.
This may take some time on your own part, but at least I gave you the post #'s to begin your own search with.
otherwise, re-tracing the conversation you had with Persevero, leads nowhere else but to his quote in #38.
Don't you remember it? You replied to it with a lengthy post quite difficult to read due to lack of paragraphs. In that post you apparently quoted a priest but failed to give a source reference or link.
You earlier post #60, from the same source (those meddlesome Jesuits, hehheh...) listed part III.
In post # 157 I brought the next, part IV where the quote can honestly be found, if not exactly word-for-word sourced.
As to the slight differences in wording, I can only guess it may be due to differing translations from what I assume was originally written up in Italian, and possibly French, at the same time.
Now our lovable little buddy vladi, posted in response to your #60 which contained part III;
Looking at part IV, what do we see, but the 'quote' apparently in question is not 'bogus' in the least?
from part IV;
Iscool, was there any other quote you were trying to assist someone here on this thread with, other than what Persevero brought, and is above?
You wrote:
“Oh, relax. If what I brought didn’t include the quote you were referencing, then WHAT QUOTE are you talking about?”
The one that was posted. If you don’t even know what quote was in question, then why would you think even for a second that you were ready for this discussion. Go back and read the thread. Find the false, phony, made-up quote which was falsely ascribed to Trent.
“I have searched this thread, and saw no other thing from Persevero presented as a quote from “Trent”. You called it a lie. I PROVED OTHERWISE. Should I re-post and highlight that one sentence from the larger context portion, so that you may see it?”
False. It was a lie. There is no such quote from Trent. What you posted was not the quote originally passed off as being from Trent. I realize facts don’t matter to some people, but they do matter to me. The simple fact is that a phony, made up quote was falsely ascribed to Trent. Nothing you can post or highlight will change that fact. The original quote ascribed to Trent was a lie. Plain and simple.