Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Time could have chosen a much less offensive photo to accompany its cover story but chose not to. Shame on them.
1 posted on 05/13/2012 5:26:54 PM PDT by CHRISTIAN DIARIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

It was all about shock value.

Nothing wrong with breast feeding unless you turn it into kiddie porn


2 posted on 05/13/2012 5:29:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

The woman is an idiot.

Unfortunately her son is going to have to live with her stupidity for the rest of his life since the photo will be on every social media site forever!


3 posted on 05/13/2012 5:29:56 PM PDT by JimVT (Oh, the days of the Kerry dancing, Oh, the ring of the piper's tune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

This woman is a pedophiles dream, and it seems her so-called husband is getting his wish. They are trying to make kiddie porn acceptable, and there is a special place below for subhumans like this.

This truly makes me ill.


5 posted on 05/13/2012 5:33:53 PM PDT by mardi59 (THE REBELLION IS ON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

How can she produce enough milk for her 4 year old child and her husband? She has to be getting a thrill up her leg like Chris Matthews.


6 posted on 05/13/2012 5:38:04 PM PDT by YukonGreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

How can she produce enough milk for her 4 year old child and her husband? She has to be getting a thrill up her leg like Chris Matthews.


7 posted on 05/13/2012 5:38:27 PM PDT by YukonGreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
“Our family is a little different than the average family,” she laughed.
9 posted on 05/13/2012 5:39:49 PM PDT by tumblindice (Our new, happy lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Without getting into the right or wrong of it all, the author completely misrepresents the American Academy of Pediatrics. I wouldn't be surprised if it does not force her to print a retraction or clarification on it's stance.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that babies be exclusively breastfed for about the first 6 months of life. This means your baby needs no additional foods (except Vitamin D) or fluids unless medically indicated. Babies should continue to breastfeed for a year and for as long as is mutually desired by the mother and baby.

12 posted on 05/13/2012 5:47:58 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
While our daughters were not breast fed they did have the occasional bottle till they were a little over three years of age.

As I understand it breast feeding past two years, and sometimes well into the third year, used to be fairly common.

As a side effect, while the mother is still breast feeding she is much less likely to become pregnant again.

15 posted on 05/13/2012 6:19:43 PM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

The human breast is primarily an instrument of nutrition for the young and only secondarily sexual. In a healthy society, that is.

Those who see kiddie porn in this photo are importing something from their own mind that isn’t actually in it.

The editors, of course, also saw sexuality in the image, which is why they chose to use it.

Hannah in the Bible, the mother of the prophet Samuel, sent him off to serve in the temple as soon as he was weaned, which certainly doesn’t imply he was a six-month or year-old infant.

In the book of Maccabees a woman reminds her son she nursed him for three years, which was probably the approximate standard for Middle Eastern cultures of the time.


16 posted on 05/13/2012 6:24:32 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

This poor kid is going to suffer the tortures of the damned throughout his school years and will make some psychiatrist very wealthy some day. This has to be some kind of record-setter for self-absorbed, clueless parenting.


18 posted on 05/13/2012 6:28:22 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Here’s the American Academy of Family Physicians position on how long a child should be breast-fed. Seems perfectly logical to me.

“As recommended by the WHO, breastfeeding should ideally continue beyond infancy, but this is not the cultural norm in the United States and requires ongoing support and encouragement.69 It has been estimated that a natural weaning age for humans is between two and seven years.70 Family physicians should be knowledgeable regarding the ongoing benefits to the child of extended breastfeeding, including continued immune protection,71 better social adjustment,72 and having a sustainable food source in times of emergency. The longer women breastfeed, the greater the decrease in their risk of breast cancer.73”

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/b/breastfeedingpositionpaper.html


19 posted on 05/13/2012 6:31:43 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

While I’d never pose with my kids like this, I’m quite disturbed at FReepers commenting on her personal pleasure. As a nursing mommy, I can assure everyone that there is NO sexual pleasure from nursing. More power to her for her choice, I’d love the fortitude to pump and then pour into a cup milk for my kids; however, 18 months is all each of them gets from me! Mommy can only take so much!


21 posted on 05/13/2012 6:39:35 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

TIME Magazine is, frankly, over.

Like USN&WR and Newsweek, no one will attend its funeral.


22 posted on 05/13/2012 6:43:32 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

As my cousin very wisely observed, “He’s gonna go to high school with kids who saw that.” And mercy they will show him none.


27 posted on 05/13/2012 7:22:18 PM PDT by Category Four (Joy, Fun, the Joke Proper, and Flippancy ... Flippancy is the best of all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Time’s ungodly cover is kiddie porn dressed up as journalism.

This is not kiddie porn. There is no sex act here. Feeding a babe-in-arms from the mother's breast must have no prurient sexual connotation in a mature culture.

The real depravity here is that it it child abuse! No child should be forced to carry memories into adulthood of suckling at his mother's breast. There is no way to predict or imagine the psychological basket-case this child or another child of similar circumstances will become due to this pernicious act.

Couple that with the understanding that this mother was willing to prostitute her parental duty and violate the trust of the boy for notoriety or some other petty gain reveals her truly aberrant crime.

29 posted on 05/13/2012 7:42:01 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

What kind of sicko equates breastfeeding with sex?


30 posted on 05/13/2012 7:54:14 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (Islam: a transnational fascist government that demands worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I guess i don’t care what other people do as long as they don’t try and push it on the rest of us...which these nazi breast feeders do.

To me its just common sense. Breastfeeding is for babies. not toddlers. If they have teeth and can eat food then they should be door sucking on the tit.

I suppose if this were a third world country it might be a different story...but it isn’t. we have nutritous food in abundance and don’t need to breast feed for years.

My children were all breastfed for about six months. all are happy, well rounded, non-obese, straight A students. And since all are in their teens and none have had more than a common cold or the flu i would say extremely healthy. So seriously i can’t see what breastfeeding for decades would have given them that they don’t already have.

I resent the implication that if you don’t nurse for eons that your kids will be unhealthy, fat little retards.


31 posted on 05/13/2012 8:02:59 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

Using common sense is a rare commodity; and whatever sells is what they’re selling. Breast feeding a baby, covered with a little modesty is beautiful . . a baby being the operative word; but their aim is to ultimately present the extreme as something the bitter clingers out here do. In reality, the normal person is modest and reasonable about it.


33 posted on 05/13/2012 8:12:09 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

I think it’s a personal decision for and by the family. If someone wants to breast feed their child that long be my guest. I’m inclined to think it benefits the Mother more than the child though. Maybe she gets lots of attention, even it some of it is bad. Maybe she can’t let go.
Also it was definitely shock value on Time’s part, and for selling magazines. I wouldn’t have a problem if the picture were of the Mother seated with the child facing her with his back to the camera. But standing on a chair? and looking into the camera like he’s saying, “see, there’s nothing wrong with it right?” and the Mother looks like she’s ready to leave for yoga class or something. It just doesn’t look right.


35 posted on 05/13/2012 8:18:31 PM PDT by happilymarriedmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST

There is definitely nothing wrong with breast feeding, but it should and can be done modestly.


36 posted on 05/13/2012 8:37:07 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson