“And, even if you DO come up with a couple of folks that believe that way, it doesn’t mean that the denial of salvation is the basis of creation science,”
Ok, so should I even bother proving that “fire-and-brimstone” Christians exist, or will you at least concede that point?
Shall we discuss why “Creation Science” exists at all then?
You were the one that was insisting that creation science is invalid because a limited subset (of which you haven’t provided example) claims damnation based on disbelief of Genesis.
All I’m telling you is that, IF those people exist, THAT PART of their assertion is in error.
I’m not even sure why you were trying to use that as a “disproval” of creation science.